At 3 minutes into the BBC programme -
"they stopped for petrol and one quibbled with the cashier over his change"
...hardly the thing to do if you are on your way to commit suicide
....neither would you throw aside your driving licence as you are about to die.
(discovered TWO DAYS later)
Only a brief mention (in a BBC newscast) was made of a power surge which ocurred as the bombs went off.
"Film made by a man with an arabic sounding name"
Paul Muad'Dib, is a fictional character in the Dune universe created by Frank Herbert;
For a person who is exposing a treachourous government, a pseudonym is an essential.
There was no mention whatsoever of the 24yr old woman who was in the medical building next to the bus bomb,
who said she heard TWO explosions.
This young woman died unexpectedly 2 weeks later.
This BBC documentary had the purpose of discrediting the credibility of the theorists.
They may well be eccentric and have strange opinions on other matters,
but this does not mean that the basis of their claims is untrue.
The BBC has been selective in what aspects of the 7/7 film it chooses to discredit,
and has neglected to mention
many other points raised in the 7/7 film.
It is sad that persons have recieved hate mail because they have been named.
That offensive would be better directed towards the alleged planners of the event - the government.
The government who have had to modify the original official explanation in the light of points made in the 7/7 film.
I choose to believe that we have not heard the full truth from either side, and maybe never will.
I examine motives - the government had good reason to benefit from it - an excuse for Irag war.
and history tells us that many have died to give government policy credibility.
eg - Pearl Harbour was allowed to happen - the japanese spy was being watched as he relayed ship movements.
eg - british soldiers were treated as guinea pigs at Christmas Island.
All in all we're just another brick in the wall - we all are 'expendable', and many of us are 'useless eaters'