Cuts and yet more Cuts.. for who?

[Mancie]

Originally Posted by jaysay

Because they won't get of their backsides to do it, especially if they'll go to prison instead of doing community serves

Originally Posted by jaysay

Bit early for the booze Mancie, obviously you only read what you think will fit in with your rose tinted glasses. My references was about a lad who preferred to go to prison rather than do community service, he was convicted

Hang on...you quoted my post about the unemployed being forced to work 30 hours a week for £64...and somewhere in your tiny brain this equated to a criminals and community service.
I'd have thought in those years of making tea for council leaders you might have picked up some political savvy..seems not.

[Barrie Yates]

Originally Posted by walkinman221

They probably wont hit the twenty odd millionares out of forty or so members of the cabinet as hard as the rest of us!!

Or the multi millionaires who previously formed the Cabinet -Blair (& his hanger on), Brown etc.

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by Mancie

Hang on...you quoted my post about the unemployed being forced to work 30 hours a week for £64...and somewhere in your tiny brain this equated to a criminals and community service.
I'd have thought in those years of making tea for council leaders you might have picked up some political savvy..seems not.

Never made a cup of tea for anybody, ask cashy, although I once tempted to make one for a Labour prospective candidate, and when I worked with Peter he wasn't the council leader, when he attained that status I retired, job done

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by Barrie Yates

Or the multi millionaires who previously formed the Cabinet -Blair (& his hanger on), Brown etc.

He lets it slip now and then Barrie, that there are loads of millionaires who support the Labour Party, well they did

[DaveinGermany]

Originally Posted by Mancie

Hang on...you quoted my post about the unemployed being forced to work 30 hours a week for £64...and somewhere in your tiny brain this equated to a criminals and community service.

What he actually meant but didn't put it across quite so concisely, is his reference to this news article in this thread Does this help ? Or am I ruining your Jay baiting ?

This what we are up against

[Mancie]

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

What he actually meant but didn't put it across quite so concisely, is his reference to this news article in this thread Does this help ? Or am I ruining your Jay baiting ?

This what we are up against

Well thanks for letting me know what Jaysay meant.. are you his body guard or brian guard?.. I still don't see how we get from people who have been convicted of a crime to people who have no job... tell me

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by Mancie

Well thanks for letting me know what Jaysay meant.. are you his body guard or brian guard?.. I still don't see how we get from people who have been convicted of a crime to people who have no job... tell me

Mancie I give up, I merely mentioned that a young lad said in court that he preferred to go to jail rather than do community service, which is entirely different than getting people, who have been on the dole for over 12 months, to do work around the towns where they live.

[DaveinGermany]

Originally Posted by Mancie

Well thanks for letting me know what Jaysay meant.. are you his body guard or brian guard?.

Neither, but as mentioned elsewhere I enjoy the role of Devil's advocate.

[cashman]

Originally Posted by jaysay

and when I worked with Peter he wasn't the council leader, when he attained that status I retired, job done

so yer owning up to be responsible fer that?.

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by cashman

so yer owning up to be responsible fer that?.

Well I put him on the right road, but not responsible for any detours along the way since