Did Graham Jones do the right thing? - Page 33

Eric · 14-05-2012, 18:56

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

I have a really witty retort for his veiled threat to we, the innocent members, unfortunately my Solicitor is still checking it for me and I can't ask my M.P.'s advice he's just not answering his 'phone, perhaps someone has upset him?

"Solicitor" ... love that term. Most Kingston solicitors hang out at the corner of Queen and Montreal ... our wonderful ladies of negotiable virtue.

All of them probably have more morals than your average politician, who has the morals of a vacuum cleaner. And that's the average.

Less · 14-05-2012, 19:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric

"Solicitor" ... love that term. Most Kingston solicitors hang out at the corner of Queen and Montreal ... our wonderful ladies of negotiable virtue.

All of them probably have more morals than your average politician, who has the morals of a vacuum cleaner. And that's the average.

Well, the ladies of the night are the 'solicitor's' I was referring to (most trustworthy) always ready to give advice. They only screw you once

The legal sort I can't afford, they continue to screw you from the moment you give them your name, until you die and their performance is never as satisfying.

Eric · 14-05-2012, 23:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

Well, the ladies of the night are the 'solicitor's' I was referring to (most trustworthy) always ready to give advice. They only screw you once

The legal sort I can't afford, they continue to screw you from the moment you give them your name, until you die and their performance is never as satisfying.

When I consider how much my two divorces have cost

, including legal costs, I think that I should have used the services of professionals earlier than I did. The young lady comes to your home or hotel room, drops her laundry etc ... and then you can go out and have fun with your friends.

And, unlike politicians, they never renege on a deal. That gets us back on topic.

accyman · 15-05-2012, 01:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric

"Solicitor" ... love that term. Most Kingston solicitors hang out at the corner of Queen and Montreal ... our wonderful ladies of negotiable virtue.

All of them probably have more morals than your average politician, who has the morals of a vacuum cleaner. And that's the average.

if you saw either type of solicitor you would end up geting screwed for money although i dont think your kind of solicitor accepts legal aid unless theres a cheri blair equivalent that does hard luck jobs.Hopefully beter looking mind

Eric · 15-05-2012, 03:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman

if you saw either type of solicitor you would end up geting screwed for money although i dont think your kind of solicitor accepts legal aid unless theres a cheri blair equivalent that does hard luck jobs.Hopefully beter looking mind

For honesty and value for money, I'll take a whore before a politician anytime. If a working girl tells you it's going to cost a buck and a half ... that's what it costs. And Cheri ... I don't be thinking so ... she has a face that would stop a whole bunch of clocks ... Big Ben even

Here's an example: our tories told us in the last election campaign, that our new F-35 fighters would cost $10 billion. After the election, the Auditor General released documents showing that the cost is $15 billion ... a difference of $5 billion

Now that's a hunk of change for the taxpayer to fork over. I think that politcians, when they go door to door, should hand out condoms ... if they are going to screw you anyway, you might as well be safe. No balloon, no party, eh

accyman · 15-05-2012, 05:46

they probably got the extra £5 billion from weighing in the navy's ships.Its ok changing back to teh plan of having jump jet type planes but what are they supposed to jump from?

DaveinGermany · 15-05-2012, 10:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman

they probably got the extra £5 billion from weighing in the navy's ships.Its ok changing back to teh plan of having jump jet type planes but what are they supposed to jump from?

Of no concern mate, because the way things are going we won't need to defend anything as UK won't exist. We'll be a satellite of some major word conglomerate or other.

Mind you it'll also mean no politicos so not all bad, just some jobsworths to ensure our compliance with the directives, hang on a minute ......................

jaysay · 15-05-2012, 10:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

Of no concern mate, because the way things are going we won't need to defend anything as UK won't exist. We'll be a satellite of some major word conglomerate or other.

Mind you it'll also mean no politicos so not all bad, just some jobsworths to ensure our compliance with the directives, hang on a minute ......................

Come back Winston Smith all is forgiven

DaveinGermany · 15-05-2012, 11:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman

Its ok changing back to teh plan of having jump jet type planes but what are they supposed to jump from?

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

Of no concern mate, because the way things are going we won't need to defend anything as UK won't exist. We'll be a satellite of some major word conglomerate or other.

Either someones been rather foolish & not been concise enough with their wording or its started already "The European Union's naval force"

EU naval force carries out strikes on Somali pirates - World Politics - World - The Independent

accyman · 15-05-2012, 13:12

maybe cameron is taking tips from canada on how to build a navy ?

Eric · 15-05-2012, 14:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

Of no concern mate, because the way things are going we won't need to defend anything as UK won't exist. We'll be a satellite of some major word conglomerate or other.

Mind you it'll also mean no politicos so not all bad, just some jobsworths to ensure our compliance with the directives, hang on a minute ......................

Mmmm ... a "word conglomerate" ... under Jaysay's leadership

... my mind is boggling

DaveinGermany · 15-05-2012, 15:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric

Mmmm ... a "word conglomerate" ... under Jaysay's leadership

... my mind is boggling

Yeeas, how old Jay will chuckle when he sees this.

jaysay · 15-05-2012, 17:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

Yes, how old Jay will chuckle when he sees this.

I would apart from the language, which ain't allowed on this site

garinda · 16-05-2012, 16:53

I think the answer to this question remains the same.

A big, fat NO!

Less · 16-05-2012, 16:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

I think the answer to this question remains the same.

A big, fat NO!

But, are you allowed to say that without a veiled threat of litigation coming your way?

(Even though he uses this thread, he who shall not be named hasn't answered your original question has he?).