Did Graham Jones do the right thing?

[Ken Moss]

Originally Posted by Less

But, are you allowed to say that without a veiled threat of litigation coming your way?

(Even though he uses this thread, he who shall not be named hasn't answered your original question has he?).

When has anyone been threatened with litigation?

[garinda]

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

When has anyone been threatened with litigation?

What happened with the legal proceedings that were started against yourself?

When another local councillor claimed what you'd posted on here was lies.

Has that instance now been settled?

[Less]

Originally Posted by Less

But, are you allowed to say that without a veiled threat of litigation coming your way?

(Even though he uses this thread, he who shall not be named hasn't answered your original question has he?).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Moss
When has anyone been threatened with litigation?



I mentioned a veiled threat, wish you could get, 'he who must not be named' to answer this thread as quick as you jumped on me.

No wonder I think a great deal less of you as each day passes.

Don't bother getting in touch with Lawyers, It isn't libel, it isn't slander, that is what I think, I take it even in your world I'm allowed to think?

[Ken Moss]

Originally Posted by garinda

What happened with the legal proceedings that were started against yourself, when another local councillor claimed what you'd posted on here was lies?

Has the matter now been settled?

Yes, he got his money.

Then he got voted off the council.

Swings and roundabouts.

[Ken Moss]

Originally Posted by Less

I mentioned a veiled threat, wish you could get, 'he who must not be named' to answer this thread as quick as you jumped on me.

No wonder I think a great deal less of you as each day passes.

Don't bother getting in touch with Lawyers, It isn't libel, it isn't slander, that is what I think, I take it even in your world I'm allowed to think?

Unlike certain Conservative councillors, I have no intention of suing anyone for expressing an opinion.

I wish I could get my head around what it is you're actually trying to say, any chance of a reply in plain English?

[garinda]

I'm suprised I wasn't sued, when I posted that the Tory candidate at the last General Election only learned how to get out of a sports car at her posh Lytham school, without showing her knickers.



'Why you nasty little Labour activist, I always show my knickers when getting out of a car!'

'I'll see you in court'.



Happy days.

The like of which we'll never see again.

Sadly.

For Labour.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

Yes, he got his money.

Then he got voted off the council.

Swings and roundabouts.

He won the case?

You did post something which wasn't true on here, a public forum?

You live...and learn.

Swings, and roundabouts.

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

When has anyone been threatened with litigation?

Well the MP sent me a PM about repeating hearsay on this website, I think he did the same to another member too, but that's what he does, besides stabbing his constituents in the back that is, and kissing Mr Eds feet

[garinda]

Originally Posted by jaysay

Well the MP sent me a PM about repeating hearsay on this website, I think he did the same to another member too, but that's what he does, besides stabbing his constituents in the back that is, and kissing Mr Eds feet

Luckily for some you can't be sued for saying one thing....and doing another.

There are no laws againsy hypocrisy.

Graham must be relieved.

For now.

[Ken Moss]

Originally Posted by garinda

You did post something which wasn't true on here, a public forum?

Apparently so. I just found it interesting that all references to the point which triggered my 'factual mishap' were seemingly absent from council minutes after that.

It was a hugely defamatory statement...which failed to ignite much interest in the local press.

I made two public apologies, the Labour group paid up the money, smiles happy day.

Apologies once again for my error.

[Less]

Originally Posted by Less

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken Moss
When has anyone been threatened with litigation?



I mentioned a veiled threat, wish you could get, 'he who must not be mentioned' to answer this thread as quick as you jumped on me.

No wonder I think a great deal less of you as each day passes.

Don't bother getting in touch with Lawyers, It isn't libel, it isn't slander, that is what I think, I take it even in your world I'm allowed to think?

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

Unlike certain Conservative councillors, I have no intention of suing anyone for expressing an opinion.

I wish I could get my head around what it is you're actually trying to say, any chance of a reply in plain English?

Ah, attack being the best form of defence, you attempt to make me seem as simple as thee.

Allow me to assist, if you are conceited enough to think YOU, are, 'he that must not be mentioned', then you are wrong, your jump, your own wrong conclusion.

Read back to some advice in this thread from the one named in the title.

Now, allow me one last sentence, I thought you might be good for the Borough, you got voted in, now actually get on and do something and stop disappointing me.
.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

Apparently so. I just found it interesting that all references to the point which triggered my 'factual mishap' were seemingly absent from council minutes after that.

Perhaps they just got lost.

In Kashmir.

[Ken Moss]

Originally Posted by Less

Ah, attack being the best form of defence, you attempt to make me seem as simple as thee.

Allow me to assist, if you are conceited enough to think YOU, are, 'he that must not be mentioned', then you are wrong, your jump, your own wrong conclusion.

Read back to some advice in this thread from the one named in the title.

Now, allow me one last sentence, I thought you might be good for the Borough, you got voted in, now actually get on and do something and stop disappointing me.
.

I'm not as conceiting as you would seemingly love to think but if you see friendly advice not to repeat something potentially libellous as a veiled threat then you must be very easily offended. Carry on regardless, just don't say you haven't been warned if one day you repeat something which may not be true and someone somewhere decides to sue you.

Solicitors have endless patience.

And costs.

[Ken Moss]

Originally Posted by jaysay

Well the MP sent me a PM about repeating hearsay on this website, I think he did the same to another member too, but that's what he does, besides stabbing his constituents in the back that is, and kissing Mr Eds feet

For your own benefit, I daresay.

Take off the blue blinkers, John. They don't suit you anymore.

[Less]

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

Apparently so. I just found it interesting that all references to the point which triggered my 'factual mishap' were seemingly absent from council minutes after that.

It was a hugely defamatory statement...which failed to ignite much interest in the local press.

I made two public apologies, the Labour group paid up the money, smiles happy day.

Apologies once again for my error.

Here, you must be wearing your first one out with all the random holes you dig.
Draper 10878 Solid Forged Tee Handled Trenching Shovel With Ash Shaft Part No: TSWTH/H - Draper available at Shovel Shop