Expenses, expenses... - Page 19

SPUGGIE J · 28-02-2009, 20:12

Ok did the quiz and now as confused and befuddled as a lost canadian goose. I am a centerist but sit at the corner junction with Libertarien and Right Concervative.

SPUGGIE J · 28-02-2009, 20:19

So we have an Andrew B fanclub here.

If all others on here have a group of like minded pals why cant he? He takes a stance speaks his mind and stands by it. Whether this be right or wrong he has the right to.

By the way Mr B how much have you bunged your pals?

claytonender · 28-02-2009, 20:20

I have a confession - well they do say confession is good for the soul-to make about the allowances I am receiving this year from HBC - thought I should let everyone know before Andrew claims I have misled the public when the expenses of all councillors are published after the end of the municipal year.

(I do so hate that there is no spell checker on Internet Explorer - reminder to myself to use Safari instead).

Well sorry I digressed but back to the sublect of my post - My member's allowances for 2008 to 2009 also include £20.83 per month (which is £250 per year), which is an allowance for not having a Hyndburn Council laptop and printer but using my own PC, laptop and printer. I also pay my own broadband subscription and for all the ink cartridges and paper for my home printer. There are a several councillors from all parties who use their own PC etc and some who have a laptop and printer provided by HBC.

claytonender · 28-02-2009, 20:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J

Ok did the quiz and now as confused and befuddled as a lost canadian goose. I am a centerist but sit at the corner junction with Libertarien and Right Concervative.

We all have our crosses to bare

SPUGGIE J · 28-02-2009, 20:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by claytonender

We all have our crosses to bare

Mines gettin too frikin heavy!!! Know a good chiropractor?

claytonender · 28-02-2009, 20:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR

I thought it was against the rules for a phone number to be shown here without consent.
Another moderator once edited my post and PMd me for doing just that.

I was just thinking the same Margaret - but maybe rules change when you are a moderator.

Caz · 28-02-2009, 20:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by claytonender

I was just thinking the same Margaret - but maybe rules change when you are a moderator.

Aye, and the mod on line at the time still hasn't removed it has he?

One rule for us then...

claytonender · 28-02-2009, 20:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Caz

Aye, and the mod on line at the time still hasn't removed it has he?

One rule for us then...

It was the same mod who was on the night Boris posted the completely unacceptable post.

Caz · 28-02-2009, 20:43

It was, yes, funnily enough.

Mancie · 28-02-2009, 20:46

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR

I thought it was against the rules for a phone number to be shown here without consent.
Another moderator once edited my post and PMd me for doing just that.

I expect Andrew does have consent

yerself · 28-02-2009, 21:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR

I thought it was against the rules for a phone number to be shown here without consent.
Another moderator once edited my post and PMd me for doing just that.

He's only copying what's publicly available here:Councillors - View by name

Royboy39 · 28-02-2009, 22:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by claytonender

I was just thinking the same Margaret - but maybe rules change when you are a moderator.

Moderator maybe, but when you are an administrator as Andrew is, you can say what you bloody well like and I think he has taken the insults very well up to now.

claytonender · 28-02-2009, 22:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by yerself

He's only copying what's publicly available here:Councillors - View by name

I apprecaite that he was - but it would probably have been better to post the think.

claytonender · 28-02-2009, 22:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Royboy39

Moderator maybe, but when you are an administrator as Andrew is, you can say what you bloody well like and I think he has taken the insults very well up to now.

It was not an insult to Andrew just an agreeing that if Margaret was censured for posting a tel number the same rules should apply to everyone.

turkishdelight · 28-02-2009, 22:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by claytonender

It was not an insult to Andrew just an agreeing that if Margaret was censured for posting a tel number the same rules should apply to everyone.

I dont think Royboy was refering to yourself Claytonender but to the many insults on these threads that i have picked up on also. As for myself their have indeed been insults which i find offensive and would never speak of a person in that manner, pathetic really. I feel the guilty ones not all i may add should reflect on their behaviour and the way they conduct themselves. Shame on them.