facebook bans saucy pics - Page 2

emzy · 19-02-2009, 14:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

If it says nude photographs are not allowed it doesn't matter if they were taken by David Bailey or Ben Dover.

I cant see the realy problem if their "bits" are covered. an arm or whatever can often cover more than a bra or bikini

jem · 19-02-2009, 14:29

i agree wiv garinda if it say not allowed then they sould respect the site n dont put anything like that up

emamum · 19-02-2009, 14:29

you are not allowed to put pics of a mum breastfeeding on facebook either.

garinda · 19-02-2009, 14:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by emzy

If tastefully done though, arnt they classed as art and not nudity / pornography?

Quote:

Originally Posted by emzy

I cant see the realy problem if their "bits" are covered. an arm or whatever can often cover more than a bra or bikini

We don't know what her 'nude' photographs showed.

If you decide to join something, you have to accept their rules, or face the consequences...just like on this forum.

As I said there are plenty of adult social networking sites where her nude photographs, tasteful or not, would be welcomed.

emzy · 19-02-2009, 14:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

We don't know what her 'nude' photographs showed.

If you decide to join something, you have to accept their rules, or face the consequences...just like on this forum.

As I said there are plenty of adult social networking sites where her nude photographs, tasteful or not, would be welcomed.

That is true, although I have no issues with things like that, I know that others will and if its against the rules then its against the rules. Have seen many pics on there that I think are inapropriate, but its just a case of whether someone reports them or not.

SamF · 19-02-2009, 14:59

Better keep the kids away from the tabloids as well then...

If anyone wants to see the pics she posted a thread in the stanley section which links to them

K-P · 19-02-2009, 15:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by emamum

hey Kipax, just seen your facebook status... did you take those pics then

I wish

No I dont, yes i do., nagh no i dont. course I do.. maybe one day

garinda · 19-02-2009, 15:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by SamF

Better keep the kids away from the tabloids as well then...

If anyone wants to see the pics she posted a thread in the stanley section which links to them

If you had a younger thirteen year old sister, would you be happy for her to have access to photographs a similarly nude man?

I'm certainly no prude, but understand rules have to be followed.

There are even rules about what is acceptable to be posted on adult only sites.

K-P · 19-02-2009, 15:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

We don't know what her 'nude' photographs showed.

I do and technically they didnt break the rules.. you absoloutly 100% could not see anything more than you would see with a small bikini thingy.. there where no parts showing...

however stood stark naked in a star position and stars photoshopped over the good (eeerm i mean naughty) got her in hot water..

the fact that they have let her start again would show they might have been a bit quick on the buzzer...

garinda · 19-02-2009, 15:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by K-P

I do and technically they didnt break the rules.. you absoloutly 100% could not see anything more than you would see with a small bikini thingy.. there where no parts showing...

however stood stark naked in a star position and stars photoshopped over the good (eeerm i mean naughty) got her in hot water..

the fact that they have let her start again would show they might have been a bit quick on the buzzer...

But if the rules state no nude photographs, but then allows some, where do they draw the line? Artily taken open crotch shots, and tastefully draped erections?

As said earlier some do slip through the net, if no one reports them.

I saw one recently, since removed, where someone had their winky in someone else's pint, taken in the Black Dog. Funny, but technically against Facebook's rules.

jem · 19-02-2009, 15:20

rules r rules some do get broken but they have to concider what is acceptable for something kids use too

K-P · 19-02-2009, 15:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

But if the rules state no nude photographs, but then allows some,

But how where these nude?

Every photograph is a nude person with stuff covered up.. the difference was that hers was covered with photoshop and mines covered with pants and god only know what you cover yours with garinda

garinda · 19-02-2009, 15:26

I wonder how much support to allow nude photographs on Facebook, if the person found to have broken the rules had been a male nude Burnley supporter...in the buff.

garinda · 19-02-2009, 15:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

I wonder how much support to allow nude photographs on Facebook, if the person found to have broken the rules had been a male nude Burnley supporter...in the buff.

That should read 'I wonder how much support there'd be to allow to nude photographs if they'd featued a similarly nude male Burnley supporter?'

(Makes not not to post whilst someone's at the door.)

lancsdave · 19-02-2009, 16:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

That should read 'I wonder how much support there'd be to allow to nude photographs if they'd featued a similarly nude male Burnley supporter?'

(Makes not not to post whilst someone's at the door.)

Vote for me. I pledge to donate to the club when I make loads of money.