General Election

[g jones]

Originally Posted by Tealeaf

It appears it was not the only thing that went wrong, Councillor Jones - so has your post.

Your right and I apologise. Typing off a mobile with small screen.

I admire Andrew for putting a robust case for the defence.

However despite that the body language was awful edited or not and not prime ministerial. Gordon cops the flack and I think Cam the Sam has to be scrutinised too.

[andrewb]

Graham, who proof read your literature?

[Ken Moss]

Originally Posted by andrewb

Graham, who proof read your literature?

Is this going to degenerate into a debate about typing errors?

I would advise you, of all people, to avoid going down that route.

[andrewb]

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

Is this going to degenerate into a debate about typing errors?

I would advise you, of all people, to avoid going down that route.

I've never made an error in any literature produced.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by andrewb

Graham, who proof read your literature?

Thread wandering, and rudely criticizing another member's writing ability.

Tut, tut.

[Ken Moss]

Originally Posted by andrewb

I've never made an error in any literature produced.

Has any literature even been produced for Karen Buckley?

Maybe they're too scared of typos and looking foolish and disorganised.

[andrewb]

Originally Posted by Ken Moss

Has any literature even been produced for Karen Buckley?

Maybe they're too scared of typos and looking foolish and disorganised.

I haven't received any nope. What's that got to do with me though?

[andrewb]

Originally Posted by andrewb

Graham, who proof read your literature?

Should have added that it's not a major issue. The actual content is far more important than missing grammar or additional words. It just seems a bit sloppy for something that probably cost a good £500-£600 to print. Just need to double check stuff in future.

[Wynonie Harris]

Originally Posted by andrewb

Graham, who proof read your literature?

I don't know who proofreads your literature, Andrew (whatever your "literature" might be), but I do hope that, unlike you, they realise that "proofread" is one word.

[andrewb]

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

I don't know who proofreads your literature, Andrew (whatever your "literature" might be), but I do hope that, unlike you, they realise that "proofread" is one word.

This is Accringtonweb, I'd put a little more effort into proofreading if it cost me £600 a post.

[Wynonie Harris]

Originally Posted by andrewb

This is Accringtonweb, I'd put a little more effort into proofreading if it cost me £600 a post.

Very good! You've got it right this time! No, no, don't thank me and definitely no chocolates!

[garinda]

The Devil's in the detail.

That's the trouble, if you're going to be hypercritical of others' abilities.

You can't afford to make even the slightest mistake.

[g jones]

I think you are being picky Andrew. Good english is helpful but we are in danger of going back to Gordon Browns one eye'd, black marker pen issue.

I always make errors when typing from my mobile and half of those are the automated error correction.

[accyman]

Originally Posted by g jones

I have said before I like Cameron, one of the very few who does

any more outbursts like that and im gonna spoil my vote on the lib dems

[andrewb]

Originally Posted by g jones

I think you are being picky Andrew. Good english is helpful but we are in danger of going back to Gordon Browns one eye'd, black marker pen issue.

I always make errors when typing from my mobile and half of those are the automated error correction.

I make tons of errors on Accyweb too. I'm terrible at spelling. I just think candidates should make more of an effort to double check things. The leaflet I got read "If you have any issues or wish to contact to me, my details are:". Yes it's a small error and you still get the main point, your contact details, but just seemed a bit careless for something that's going to 43,000 homes.