Gun Control - Page 16

Neil · 17-12-2012, 14:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guinness

and here's a chilling picture from this years show

Machine Gun Expo Is Down-Home Americana Gone Ballistic | Raw File | Wired.com

I agree, its terrible that boy was allowed to shoot that gun without his ear plugs in.

Neil · 17-12-2012, 14:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

The problem wi News Coverage these days is sensationalist overkill, instead of just reporting whats actually happened, which it could be argued gives more attention etc etc, to the nutters in society than any video game influence imho.that is not saying video games etc don't carry influence, but i reckon loonballs will require the maximum attention.

I don't think the news should be censored like it is. Show the death and destruction happening in places like Afghanistan and then maybe people can make a real informed decision about if we should be out there or not.

cashman · 17-12-2012, 15:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by Neil

I don't think the news should be censored like it is. Show the death and destruction happening in places like Afghanistan and then maybe people can make a real informed decision about if we should be out there or not.

Have nothing against that, but that aint overkill,But thats a joke neil- people can make informed decisions about if we should be out yon, that will not make the remotest difference, its what the politicos say simple as.

jaysay · 17-12-2012, 19:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth

So, MargaretR, to sum up the benefits of your research-
This twenty year old veteran(which war? Vietnam?) with a brain implant which turned him into a robot like assassin was drugged up on scopolamine( wasn't the implant working?) and was instructed to kill twenty children and six teachers by the CIA for reasons you haven't uncovered yet.
Can I suggest it was because the CIA didn't have a drone handy?
He killed himself on instruction so he wouldn't be a witness and the CIA thought all this would help in the Libor case his father is involved in.
I can't decide if you're trolling or I should speak to my contact in SMERSH and warn them you're out of control. But I do look forward to your next revelations.
Either way-wrong place, wrong time.

Gordon SMERSH is the only answer I'm afraid, I hear Rosa Klebb's daughter is following in her mothers footsteps

Gordon Booth · 17-12-2012, 19:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by MargaretR

I am saddened by your anger.
It is such a negative emotion which harms you.

I have you on ignore but read your posts.
The 'ignore' prevents you from sending another 'apology PM'.

You need to stop doing things that need apologies.

Please don't be sad, MargaretR, I promise you you haven't made me angry.
Your silly conspiracy posts can be irritating, like a fly buzzing around, they can even raise a smile but angry-no, it would take a lot more than that.
I am, I must say, sometimes rather worried about you but I promise you not a lot, so please don't feel saddened because you worry me.
If I'm on your ignore list why do you read my posts and address a post to me?
Admit it, you can't resist, you enjoy it!
As for the 'apology PM'- I thought PM meant Private Message and quoting them was against the site rules(also rather bad form)- now you've made me sad(not angry).

You need to stop posting conspiracy rubbish which irritates people.

jaysay · 17-12-2012, 19:32

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth

Please don't be sad, MargaretR, I promise you you haven't made me angry.
Your silly conspiracy posts can be irritating, like a fly buzzing around, they can even raise a smile but angry-no, it would take a lot more than that.
I am, I must say, sometimes rather worried about you but I promise you not a lot, so please don't feel saddened because you worry me.
If I'm on your ignore list why do you read my posts and address a post to me?
Admit it, you can't resist, you enjoy it!
As for the 'apology PM'- I thought PM meant Private Message and quoting them was against the site rules(also rather bad form)- now you've made me sad(not angry).

You need to stop posting conspiracy rubbish which irritates people.

Amen to that Gordon, amen to that

cashman · 17-12-2012, 19:44

Disagree people can post owt they want slong as its not slanderous etc,The conspiracy crap don't irritate everyone, in fact it amuses some.

Gordon Booth · 17-12-2012, 19:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

Disagree people can post owt they want slong as its not slanderous etc,The conspiracy crap don't irritate everyone, in fact it amuses some.

Agreed, cashman, I sometimes smile( but not a lot).And I do post 'owt',rubbish sometimes.
I was trying to match MargaretRs final line with my final line.
Quoting someones old PM isn't slanderous but it is a bit naughty, isn't it?

cashman · 17-12-2012, 19:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gordon Booth

Agreed, cashman, I sometimes smile( but not a lot).And I do post 'owt',rubbish sometimes.
I was trying to match MargaretRs final line with my final line.
Quoting someones old PM isn't slanderous but it is a bit naughty, isn't it?

Have yeh not learned yet gordon? women yeh cannot beat.