Internationalist approach at H.B.C. - Page 3

accyman · 13-11-2011, 19:07

another minority group to pander to.

jesus christ is anything going to be left for the so called majority group ?

garinda · 13-11-2011, 19:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by accyman

another minority group to pander to.

jesus christ is anything going to be left for the so called majority group ?

Don't be so negative, please.

At least wait until I've finished lobbying H.B.C., and they've announced their support for my campaign to have the nature reserve declared an official 'safe zone', for lesbian birds.

Thank you.

accyman · 13-11-2011, 19:25

your right garinda i should embrace this opportunity to get minority status for plastic garden gnomes and other garden ornaments in animal form.

forgive me

gynn · 13-11-2011, 20:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

lesbian birds.

Is it possible to have lesbians who aren't birds??

garinda · 13-11-2011, 20:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn

Is it possible to have lesbians who aren't birds??

Lesbianism can occur in any species.

Haven't you ever seen any lesbian pussies?

It's not just birds who need a haven.

But they are a priority at the moment at the nature reserve, as they can be vunerable to attack from cocks.

I'm just hoping H.B.C. will take their plight seriously.

Benipete · 13-11-2011, 20:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by gynn

Is it possible to have lesbians who aren't birds??

Yep If they don't fall into the Diving Bird categoric species they are exempt.

Wynonie Harris · 13-11-2011, 21:11

Good evening, Councillor Dawson. Nice to see you on here. Care to comment on this particular issue?

g jones · 13-11-2011, 21:25

Apparently it was brought by Allah Dad. I do agree the opposition could focus more on Hyndburn matters. It also runs contrary to the Governments policy of staying out of the issue.

Wynonie Harris · 13-11-2011, 21:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones

Apparently it was brought by Allah Dad. I do agree the opposition could focus more on Hyndburn matters. It also runs contrary to the Governments policy of staying out of the issue.

So why did the Labour councillors support the resolution? Why didn't they chuck it out and inform the opposition that they should indeed focus on Hyndburn issues?

Wynonie Harris · 13-11-2011, 21:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

Good evening, Councillor Dawson. Nice to see you on here. Care to comment on this particular issue?

Oo-err, he's gorn! Must've been something I said!

Retlaw · 13-11-2011, 21:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

Good to know the council are spending their valuable time, trying to sort out the problems we have here in Hyndburn.

UK City Council supports â€˜Kashmiris' Right to Self determinationâ€™ | GroundReport

Perhaps at the next full meeting of the council, we'll be declared a nuclear free zone, or it's decided that we're going to be sponsoring a Save The Whale programme in Nicaragua.

Nice to note we've been awarded city status though.

Still, as long as they have their priorities in order, that's all that matters.

How long will it be before they want self determination over here for all the different groups.
What will become of Bradford, Burnley, Birmingham, separate states etc, they've already got to much shout on councils up and down the country.
Retlaw.

garinda · 13-11-2011, 22:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones

Apparently it was brought by Allah Dad. I do agree the opposition could focus more on Hyndburn matters. It also runs contrary to the Governments policy of staying out of the issue.

The issue being international politics?

I'm sure there's few who'd disagree with you, on that one Graham.

Local council - local issues.

Though it does seem strange, that our now Labour controlled council invited Labour's Lancashire County Councillor Misfar Hassan, to come and lobby Hyndburn councillors into supporting the Kashmiri peoples' right to self-determination.

Still, nevermind, at least we know Labour politicans support the Kashmiri peoples' right to self-determination.

Even if they don't support ours'.

By them voting against us having the right to have a say in our fight for self-determination.

Eh...Graham?

Whilst you're here Graham, why did you do that?

Say you didn't have a problem with a referendum, even mentioning that it would settle the matter 'democratically', then voted against us being given that right...just two weeks later?

We'd all love to know that

Self-determination's good for Kashmir, but not Hyndburn?

Sounds more than a tad hypocritical to me.

Care to put us straight, as to why it isn't?

garinda · 13-11-2011, 22:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

Oo-err, he's gorn! Must've been something I said!

Probably gone to ask that 'EdM', whoever that is, what he should do next.

cashman · 13-11-2011, 22:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones

Apparently it was brought by Allah Dad. I do agree the opposition could focus more on Hyndburn matters. It also runs contrary to the Governments policy of staying out of the issue.

That is without question imho, it seems to me that the local council are pandering in the hopes of crosses in the election boxes.

garinda · 13-11-2011, 22:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by garinda

Probably gone to ask that 'EdM', whoever that is, what he should do next.

Sorry, didn't realise you meant Bernard.

Graham's popped off too.

Must be a party somewhere.

He'll be back.

So will I.

Asking the same question.

Either until he has the manners to answer, what's a very relevant question, to a lot of his constituents, or one of us drops down dead.

But even then, if I do pop my clogs first, which is doubtful, seeing as bad meat doesn't really go off, I'm sure I'd still be hanging about.

Hauntingly demanding that people deserve answers, as to why what he said, isn't what he actually did.