Judging a book by it's cover.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by lancsdave

Oh good I can still think you're a plank

Thank you.

That's sweet.

It's nice when someone as thick as two short ones, can look up to a real plank.

[DaveinGermany]

Originally Posted by garinda

Don't worry.

I'll still be ready with a scathing, and cutting quip, for anyone I thinks deserves it, and I know that they're capable of giving as good as they get, in return.

That's just ........ so you !

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by DaveinGermany

That's just ........ so you !

Ya he's defo one of the sharpest in the knife box

[garinda]

Happily I'm no longer ashamed.

Though others should be.

Some people who decide to share their sometimes strongly worded views with us, deserve to be challenged. It's a discussion forum, after all.

Others, because people purely don't happen to share their enthusiasms, don't.

[derekgas]

Originally Posted by flashy

i trust not one person on this site to tell me the truth

I dont reckon I ever told you an untruth! But feel free to pm me if you disagree x

[Retlaw]

Originally Posted by flashy

Ah but if you are lead to believe by the person themselves that they are something they are not then you have every right to judge, the person has said a lot about their age, it has made me think other things that other people have said are a load of bull too, i trust not one person on this site to tell me the truth

Nay Flashy, when av I lied tu thee, ave crossed thee of mi xmas list, no orange fur thee.
Retlaw

[jaysay]

I always tell the truth Shaz always, Bee's a lovely chap

[garinda]

To all the conspiracy theorists, who think a certain member isn't genuine, but someone posting under a different username, you are wrong.

Fact.

100% wrong.

Turns out we have a mutual friend, from their primary school, which they left two years ago.

Time to accept people as they are, and stop the nasty digs.

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by garinda

To all the conspiracy theorists, who think a certain member isn't genuine, but someone posting under a different username, you are wrong.

Fact.

100% wrong.

Turns out we have a mutual friend, from their primary school, which they left two years ago.

Time to accept people as they are, and stop the nasty digs.

Who would that be then:confu sed:

[garinda]

Originally Posted by jaysay

Who would that be then:confu sed:

I'm not naming names, or betraying confidences.

The member on here people think is an older person, isn't.

As posted earlier, I was guilty of nasty teasing myself, after being told someone was posting under a different username.

This isn't the case.

The person who is still having digs aimed at them, left primary school two years ago.

I personally know this as fact.

It's time we all cut others a little bit of slack.

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by garinda

I'm not naming names, or betraying confidences.

The member on here people think is an older person, isn't.

As posted earlier, I was guilty of nasty teasing myself, after being told someone was posting under a different username.

This isn't the case.

The person who is still having digs aimed at them, left primary school two years ago.

I personally know this as fact.

It's time we all cut others a little bit of slack.

I've already said what the answer is, I never have believed in ear say, seeing is believing in my book, and as yet I've seen nothing to change my mind

[garinda]

Originally Posted by jaysay

seeing is believing in my book

I know you were brought up a Catholic, but do you not believe in God?

Even though you've seen no proof?

I've said my piece.

Anyone who knows me, knows that I'm not in the habit of posting things which aren't true.

The target of nasty sniping is twelve years old, and there's a reason they seem to have certain obsessions.

Carry on, if that's your wish.

Personally, now I know the truth, I think it's shameful.

[garinda]

If people find certain posts tiresome, there's one easy solution.

Don't read them.

Personally I get tired of clicking on a new post, only to read some banal comment added, for the umpteenth time, which adds nothing to further a thead's disussion, but which is usually some nonsensical chit-chat.

I stopped reading those sort of posts ages ago.

[Less]

Originally Posted by garinda

Anyone who knows me, knows that I'm not in the habit of posting things which aren't true.

The target of nasty sniping is twelve years old, and there's a reason they seem to have certain obsessions.

Carry on, if that's your wish.





Personally, now I know the truth, I think it's shameful.

Someone of 12 years of age should have applied for written permission from the Administrators before they are allowed to post on site and if it's who I suspect then their profile should not claim they are of an age almost 3 times what it is. (That leaves them open to far worse than a bit of teasing, or as you call it sniping).

Parental control is expected and called for in all aspects for someone of such a delicate age to post on the www.

I have no objection to his/her posting but surely the onus is on his/her parents/carers to ensure that we have a level and honest playing field?

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by Less

Someone of 12 years of age should have applied for written permission from the Administrators before they are allowed to post on site and if it's who I suspect then their profile should not claim they are of an age almost 3 times what it is. (That leaves them open to far worse than a bit of teasing, or as you call it sniping).

Parental control is expected and called for in all aspects for someone of such a delicate age to post on the www.

I have no objection to his/her posting but surely the onus is on his/her parents/carers to ensure that we have a level and honest playing field?

100% Spot on Less