Quote:
Originally Posted by jaysay
Is there a rule on age Neil, I'm asking because I genuinely don't know
|
Indeed there is,
it is in place to protect both the innocent
and the site, after all what could be worse than finding that our site has caused harm to our youth?
When adults or people claiming to be adults sign up to the site they are treated as adults, however if someone of a delicate age tries to sign up they are flagged and are asked for adult permission in writing to
protect them.
In this particular case, we either have a child that lied or else an adult that started a membership, then passed it on to a child, (I honestly can't see this young man able to make up the profile he used).
The whole of this has been blamed on bullies and unfeeling people, why?
Well it's obvious to me, why,
a child managed with or without adult assistance, deliberatly or innocently to have access to the site, the fact that that child is supposedly 'afflicted' in some manner does not excuse the adults supposedly responsible for that child, they allowed this to happen.
I don't blame the Administrators or Moderators for this deliberate lie, but anyone that is responsible for this child that allowed him to be treated as an adult IS to blame.
It could have meant due to what a child thought as 'little white lies', the end of accyweb had something far more serious happened.
Who would be to blame?
The members? The Moderators? The Administrators? The owner?
Or
The adults that knew of this childs actions but did nothing about it?
That child was treated as he was by members that had looked at his profile and treated him as an adult, he was accepted as what he claimed to be, therefore treated as we have all seen.
Can I ask that in future any child in similar circumstances is protected not by accyweb, (it could have been a worse site he was a member of), but by the people that should protect him?
His parents and guardians?