Legalise "Illegal" Drugs? - Page 91

kestrelx · 30-01-2013, 17:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guinness

Which 'partly' was the joke, leisure centres, (safe) drugs, assistants or 'medics'?

And which was 'partly' not a joke, leisure centres, (safe) drugs, assistants or medics?

Well "joke" perhaps is the wrong word - I dropped it in the mix because I knew it was controversial and would get some hackles up. The issue is who finances it and so on. How many people are dieing taking new designer "legal highs"? Why do people take "legal highs"? New drugs created because they are not currently illegal. What I'm saying if their were centres then there would be less deaths?

But that's if they do legalise some drugs then maybe?

Restless · 01-02-2013, 15:54

There is a place where they can go where they can still get drugs, its generally safer, get fed and get to have their own room with TV's....its called prison

jaysay · 01-02-2013, 18:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Restless

There is a place where they can go where they can still get drugs, its generally safer, get fed and get to have their own room with TV's....its called prison

Ya seems about right that

Guinness · 01-02-2013, 18:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx

Well "joke" perhaps is the wrong word - I dropped it in the mix because I knew it was controversial and would get some hackles up. The issue is who finances it and so on. How many people are dieing taking new designer "legal highs"? Why do people take "legal highs"? New drugs created because they are not currently illegal. What I'm saying if their were centres then there would be less deaths?

But that's if they do legalise some drugs then maybe?

Which is controversial? The word 'joke' or the ill thought out paragraph you posted about leisure centres, medics and assistants.

I'm confused, because I found neither controversial, inane maybe, but definitely not controversial.

It's also a well known ploy, that when someone says something really stupid and find that they cannot back it up, they claim they were 'only joking'

jaysay · 01-02-2013, 18:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guinness

Which is controversial? The word 'joke' or the ill thought out paragraph you posted about leisure centres, medics and assistants.

I'm confused, because I found neither controversial, inane maybe, but definitely not controversial.

It's also a well known ploy, that when someone says something really stupid and find that they cannot back it up, they claim they were 'only joking'

A ploy this guy often uses Guinness

kestrelx · 02-02-2013, 16:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guinness

Which is controversial? The word 'joke' or the ill thought out paragraph you posted about leisure centres, medics and assistants.

I'm confused, because I found neither controversial, inane maybe, but definitely not controversial.

It's also a well known ploy, that when someone says something really stupid and find that they cannot back it up, they claim they were 'only joking'

No it's not that stupid I actually believe we should have the responsiblity to take drugs in a safe environment. Like we can buy a car and speed up the motorway - that's our choice. Some do buy cars and speed up the motorway - some get caught, some kill people. Ultimately there is no difference.

For example taking some magic mushrooms for the first time and walking round a zoo or some amazing gardens or a mix of both - would be an amazing experience.

churchfcrules · 02-02-2013, 16:37

a zoo, on shrooms, u on drugs!!!!!

kestrelx · 02-02-2013, 16:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by churchfcrules

a zoo, on shrooms, u on drugs!!!!!

I had some good laughs on them - drove through the lake district once in a van and it looked like "hobbit" land - why not share the good vibes!

churchfcrules · 02-02-2013, 16:42

just thinkin of the dangerous animals that are at a zoo, when yer trippin, not a good mix

DaveinGermany · 02-02-2013, 17:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx

Like we can buy a car and speed up the motorway - that's our choice.

Yes, you're quite right, but it doesn't make it any less illegal does it ?

Guinness · 02-02-2013, 18:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx

No it's not that stupid I actually believe we should have the responsiblity to take drugs in a safe environment.

Quote:

Originally Posted by kestrelx

drove through the lake district once in a van and it looked like "hobbit" land - why not share the good vibes!

So you driving a van under the influence of drugs round the lake district is your version of being responsible and in a safe environment?

jaysay · 03-02-2013, 09:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guinness

So you driving a van under the influence of drugs round the lake district is your version of being responsible and in a safe environment?

I'm just wondering Guinness, when is this drug addled lunatic going to be banned from a family site or does nobody care anymore.

Restless · 03-02-2013, 12:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

drug addled lunatic

Just for prosperity. KesX said does not take drugs anymore.

I think comments he has made should be reserved for the 18+ area of the site. Self moderation is very much required on KesX' part. We have a least one young person on the site that surely doesn't need to be reading about "joys" of driving whilst under the influence of mind altering drugs -- Young Master ConClubBoy has enough danger in his life.

Restless · 03-02-2013, 12:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaysay

Ya seems about right that

Apparently true. I was talking to somebody once that said there is more drugs available in prisons than there is on the streets. Perhaps an over-exaggeration?

DaveinGermany · 03-02-2013, 13:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Restless

We have a least one young person on the site that surely doesn't need to be reading about "joys" of driving whilst under the influence of mind altering drugs -- Young Master ConClubBoy has enough danger in his life.

It's been mentioned elsewhere, but the tenets of Darwinism seems to be ever more appealing.