|
General Chat General chat - common sense in here please. Decent serious discussions to be enjoyed by everyone! |
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
|
26-12-2011, 11:39
|
#1
|
God Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tragic Conn
Posts: 4,007
Liked: 3 times
Rep Power: 2471
|
Linguistic tic's and crutches
I was watching an interview on the box the other day (BBC1 News) and could not help feeling really riled by the laziness of both interviewer and interviewee who over-employed that linguistic crutch so common today; "y'know". Is it really asking too much of these overpaid and underempoyed simpletons to actually use the language, as opposed to abusing it at every available opportunity? Of course, what makes the matter worse, adding insult to injury, is the attempt to make a virtue out of their inability?
Thinking about it. It seems to me that the language is a fairly accurate mirror of society. Consider, prior to 1968 and the summer of love and protest. Society was a good deal more buttoned up than it subsequently has become. Recieved Pronunciation was the standard of spoken English in this country to which most attempted to aspire. Gorgeously rounded vowels and sounded aspirants and percussives were the hallmark of the upwardly socially mobile. Whereas, dropped aitches and glottal stops were the signs of a background of economic hardship and academic underachievement.
Since 1968 society has shifted to become more mid atlantic in its attitudes and sadly the language has followed suit. Of course, the trendy liberal/left equate this shift with the growth and development of a language that is living and culturally vibrant. Having little appreciation of, or liking for, the culture and heritage of our nation, they would, wouldn't they?
And so it is that we see the entry into the language of the abomination that is known as Estuarine English. At best a regional accent that, through the prominence of the South East as the driver of the economy, has come to dominate all that is produced by the broadcast media. I am sick to death of hearing the word 'drawing' mis-prononced as 'drawring'. I loathe the use of the word 'innit', particularly as it is used by the immigrant population as a sort of catch all 'Don't you agree/QED/see what I mean' expostulatory, exhortative and interrogatory, all rolled into one, speaking only of the lack and deficiency of the speakers vocabulary.
There are other words and phrases that excite similar distaste and ire, here are a few.
Feel free to add your own
'what it is, right' at the commencement of an explanation.
'it's doin my ead in' an expression of inchoate confusion and/or anger
'warrameanis' (trans) what I mean, is ...
'I was like...' / ' and I'm like...'
'I'm lovin this... that or the other' I hate Macdonalds!
And the next person to tell me that something insignificant and commonplace is 'Awesome' is just asking for a swift and none too gentle smack round the chops.
Also, while we are at it. can we regulars get our heads round the difference between
there and their
and
your and you're
it really isn't that difficult!
Anyway, rant over. Please add your own particular linguistic bettes noir below.
__________________
Enough is ENOUGH Get Britain out of Europe
Last edited by Acrylic-bob; 26-12-2011 at 11:47.
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 11:59
|
#2
|
Resting In Peace
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Morecambe
Posts: 4,208
Liked: 416 times
Rep Power: 36415
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob
I was watching an interview on the box the other day (BBC1 News) and could not help feeling really riled by the laziness of both interviewer and interviewee who over-employed that linguistic crutch so common today; "y'know". Is it really asking too much of these overpaid and underempoyed simpletons to actually use the language, as opposed to abusing it at every available opportunity? Of course, what makes the matter worse, adding insult to injury, is the attempt to make a virtue out of their inability?
Thinking about it. It seems to me that the language is a fairly accurate mirror of society. Consider, prior to 1968 and the summer of love and protest. Society was a good deal more buttoned up than it subsequently has become. Recieved Pronunciation was the standard of spoken English in this country to which most attempted to aspire. Gorgeously rounded vowels and sounded aspirants and percussives were the hallmark of the upwardly socially mobile. Whereas, dropped aitches and glottal stops were the signs of a background of economic hardship and academic underachievement.
Since 1968 society has shifted to become more mid atlantic in its attitudes and sadly the language has followed suit. Of course, the trendy liberal/left equate this shift with the growth and development of a language that is living and culturally vibrant. Having little appreciation of, or liking for, the culture and heritage of our nation, they would, wouldn't they?
And so it is that we see the entry into the language of the abomination that is known as Estuarine English. At best a regional accent that, through the prominence of the South East as the driver of the economy, has come to dominate all that is produced by the broadcast media. I am sick to death of hearing the word 'drawing' mis-prononced as 'drawring'. I loathe the use of the word 'innit', particularly as it is used by the immigrant population as a sort of catch all 'Don't you agree/QED/see what I mean' expostulatory, exhortative and interrogatory, all rolled into one, speaking only of the lack and deficiency of the speakers vocabulary.
There are other words and phrases that excite similar distaste and ire, here are a few.
Feel free to add your own
'what it is, right' at the commencement of an explanation.
'it's doin my ead in' an expression of inchoate confusion and/or anger
'warrameanis' (trans) what I mean, is ...
'I was like...' / ' and I'm like...'
'I'm lovin this... that or the other' I hate Macdonalds!
And the next person to tell me that something insignificant and commonplace is 'Awesome' is just asking for a swift and none too gentle smack round the chops.
Also, while we are at it. can we regulars get our heads round the difference between
there and their
and
your and you're
it really isn't that difficult!
Anyway, rant over. Please add your own particular linguistic bettes noir below.
|
Know what I mean.
Should of, would of, instead of should have, would have etc
And, sorry A-B but you are guilty (see title of this thread), the greengrocer's apostrophe as in your tic's above. Pear's 70p/pound, avocado's 50p each etc etc.
And it should be betes noir not bettes noir plus a circumflew but I don't know how to do one on this computer.
I used to be a proofreader/editor.
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:07
|
#3
|
God Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tragic Conn
Posts: 4,007
Liked: 3 times
Rep Power: 2471
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Quote:
Originally Posted by susie123
And it should be betes noir not bettes noir plus a circumflew but I don't know how to do one on this computer.
I used to be a proofreader/editor.
|
I'm a baker I do typo's, mea culpa.
You used to be a proofreader, it is circumflex not circumflew. Touche (e accute) I think. 'circumflew' sounds like something from a Harry Potter novel
__________________
Enough is ENOUGH Get Britain out of Europe
Last edited by Acrylic-bob; 26-12-2011 at 12:10.
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:08
|
#4
|
Full Member+
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Accrington
Posts: 685
Liked: 50 times
Rep Power: 38811
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Circumflex!!
Bęte noire....just cut & paste it from Google, like I do....
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:11
|
#5
|
God Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tragic Conn
Posts: 4,007
Liked: 3 times
Rep Power: 2471
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve2qec
Circumflex!!
Bęte noire....just cut & paste it from Google, like I do....
|
This man is a hidden genius. Happy New Year!
__________________
Enough is ENOUGH Get Britain out of Europe
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:16
|
#6
|
Beacon of light
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
I hate it when the young people say 'yeah' to check if you understand the meaning of what they have said.
I was once in PC World getting a computer fixed(yes, that is a joke) and a young asian man was explaining something to me, after each point he said 'yeah, right'....I nodded, but afterwards was happy to tell my daughter that all his explaining had been as worthless as the 'yeah, rights' in the conversation.
'Ok, yeah' is another one of my hates too......Miss BD has recently started using this phrase. Needless to say, I have told her that if I hear her use this phrase, then there will be no pocket money for the week.....so far so good.
__________________
The world will not be destroyed by evil people...
It will be destroyed by those who stand by and do Nothing.
(a paraphrase on a quote by Albert Einstein)
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:20
|
#7
|
Full Member+
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Accrington
Posts: 685
Liked: 50 times
Rep Power: 38811
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
People saying "innit" after every sentence.
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:24
|
#8
|
God Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tragic Conn
Posts: 4,007
Liked: 3 times
Rep Power: 2471
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob
I'm a baker I do typo's, mea culpa.
You used to be a proofreader, it is circumflex not circumflew. Touche (e accute) I think. 'circumflew' sounds like something from a Harry Potter novel
|
'Accute' should be 'acute'. I do check, sometimes.
__________________
Enough is ENOUGH Get Britain out of Europe
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:26
|
#9
|
Beacon of light
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve2qec
People saying "innit" after every sentence.
|
Oh, yes...that as well...hate it!
__________________
The world will not be destroyed by evil people...
It will be destroyed by those who stand by and do Nothing.
(a paraphrase on a quote by Albert Einstein)
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:29
|
#10
|
Resting In Peace
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Morecambe
Posts: 4,208
Liked: 416 times
Rep Power: 36415
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob
I'm a baker I do typo's, mea culpa.
You used to be a proofreader, it is circumflex not circumflew. Touche (e accute) I think. 'circumflew' sounds like something from a Harry Potter novel
|
Oops! set myself up for that... hoist with my own petard - or something like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by steve2qec
Circumflex!!
Bęte noire....just cut & paste it from Google, like I do....
|
I know Steve, just can't be a**ed. By the time I've finished putting in all the spaces and caps that the dodgy space bar and shift key on this computer leave out I've had enough!
Perhaps this is how new words arise:
circumflew = round the world airline trip ticket
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:33
|
#11
|
Resting In Peace
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Morecambe
Posts: 4,208
Liked: 416 times
Rep Power: 36415
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Gonna instead of going to.
Finally has crept in everywhere as in The day has finally arrived instead of just The day has come. Makes everything sound so apocalyptic.
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 12:37
|
#12
|
God Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tragic Conn
Posts: 4,007
Liked: 3 times
Rep Power: 2471
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
[quote=susie123;958223]Oops! set myself up for that... hoist with my own petard - or something like that.
A sort of 'Bombe Surprise' so to speak.
__________________
Enough is ENOUGH Get Britain out of Europe
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 15:27
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Great Harwood
Posts: 1,143
Liked: 226 times
Rep Power: 91933
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Quote:
Originally Posted by susie123
Oops! set myself up for that... hoist with my own petard - or something like that.
I know Steve, just can't be a**ed. By the time I've finished putting in all the spaces and caps that the dodgy space bar and shift key on this computer leave out I've had enough!
Perhaps this is how new words arise:
circumflew = round the world airline trip ticket
|
My pet hate: "Can't be arsed." Sorry, Susie.
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 15:37
|
#14
|
I am Banned
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Accrington.
Posts: 4,627
Liked: 601 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael1954
My pet hate: "Can't be arsed." Sorry, Susie.
|
A wish yu lot ud lurn tu tawk reigt, wods appund tut propur English like wod eye touwt.
Retlaw.
|
|
|
26-12-2011, 16:02
|
#15
|
God Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: c l m
Posts: 12,362
Liked: 518 times
Rep Power: 68670
|
Re: Linguistic tic's and crutches
Far more irritating than what they say, is how they say it.
Too many women programme presenters are chosen for their looks.
Screeching giggling high pitched girls are the result.
They should take instruction from velvet voiced Moira Stewart.
__________________
|
|
|
Other sites of interest.. |
More town sites.. |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58.
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com
|
|