On Behalf of Gayle Night - Page 14

Bazf · 30-03-2005, 17:24

Soon everybody will be able to cop a view

A MONUMENT planned for the summit of Accrington's Coppice could open up parts of the landmark to disabled people.

Currently access to the Coppice, from Avenue Parade and Arden Hall is too steep and difficult for many elderly, infirm or disabled people to manage.

But if plans to build a `panopticon' on the top of the site get the green light, routes up the Coppice could be altered to make it easier, as part of related improvements to the site.

Today the plans -- which could include smoothing pathways and including disabled parking spaces -- were welcomed by a local disabled support group.

Gayle Knight, spokesman for Mid Pennine Arts, the group behind the panopticon project, said: "It will be one of the things that will be looked into if further funding is brought into the site."

In nearby Rossendale a statue known as Halo -- originally planned for the Coppice but turned down by the council -- is set to go ahead, and among the work to be carried out as part of £300,000 worth of changes to the area are disabled access improvements.

Groups including `Remade', an organisation which invests money in improving derelict areas, and development body Groundwork, are involved financially.

It is hoped that similar improvements and investment could be brought into Accrington if plans for the panopticon are approved by the council.

So far, conservation group English Heritage have indicated it may invest, and local group the Friends of Arden Hall is looking at funding improvements to access from the hall.

Today Susan Ripley, secretary of the Great Harwood and District Disabled Club, said: "Anything to help disabled people would be a benefit really. I am disabled so I know what it's like and you just don't get to go to those sort of places really.

"Sometimes they say disabled access and when it's put into place it isn't really that much good for disabled people. I think they would have to ask for disabled people to help them and make sure it's easy for disabled people at the end of the day."

Gayle added: "The Accrington and Rossendale sites are different. I wouldn't dare to say the Coppice was a derelict site, as people use it a lot.

"But it is in need of repair and it needs a little bit of tender loving care to get it to the glory that it once was.

Gayle · 30-03-2005, 18:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bazf

Soon everybody will be able to cop a view
.

I will once again stress that I did NOT instigate this piece in the LET.

Bazf · 30-03-2005, 18:16

I think its called investagative journalism or made up which ever fits, it was just a coincidence I was reading it on line and you posted.

lindsay ormerod · 30-03-2005, 18:16

Never trust the Press,eh Gayle?

park381 · 30-03-2005, 18:20

Not saying you did Gayle, but it's brought the point about disabled access out in to the open

jason · 30-03-2005, 18:27

Never believe anything the papers,they write what they want to write and dont care who they hurt in the process......i know all about that!!

Neil · 30-03-2005, 18:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bazf

Gayle Knight, spokesman for Mid Pennine Arts

Gayle is an unusual name for a man

park381 · 30-03-2005, 22:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by jason

Never believe anything the papers,they write what they want to write and dont care who they hurt in the process......i know all about that!!

I know where you are coming from, but people do read, and do believe, as they always do. In this case it may make one or two people sit up and take notice of whats going on around them.

Acrylic-bob · 31-03-2005, 11:30

According to the Telegraph 28/02/04) £1,000,000 was originally budgeted for the Panopticons Scheme. If all six projects cost £50,000 each, what happens to the remaining £700,000?

Tealeaf · 31-03-2005, 12:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob

According to the Telegraph 28/02/04) £1,000,000 was originally budgeted for the Panopticons Scheme. If all six projects cost £50,000 each, what happens to the remaining £700,000?

Just a quick thought.....if the Panopticons scheme, is in fact, a single scheme (although multi-site) then I would assume that under public sector tendering rules that this was advertised in the OJEC? (Offcial Journal of the European Community).

To those of you who are not aware, all government procurements wth a capital value just above 100,000pds have to be advertised in this weekly journal to allow for competitive tendering thoughout the EU. If this ain't been done, and the Panopticons combined are a single scheme, then to go ahead without abiding by EU rules would make it illegal.

Any comments?

park381 · 31-03-2005, 12:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf

If this ain't been done, and the Panopticons combined are a single scheme, then to go ahead without abiding by EU rules would make it illegal.
Any comments?

Total agreement with that one Tealeaf

park381 · 31-03-2005, 12:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob

According to the Telegraph 28/02/04) £1,000,000 was originally budgeted for the Panopticons Scheme. If all six projects cost £50,000 each, what happens to the remaining £700,000?

Could that not be spin off, or other "fees"

Acrylic-bob · 31-03-2005, 13:29

Even factoring in the designers fee of £10K each only brings the cost up to £360K. That still leaves an awful lot unaccounted for.
And you can hardly say that MPA have been lavish with the publicity material.

Margaret Pilkington · 31-03-2005, 14:26

On the subject of Access for the Disabled.........would you enlist the opinions and advice from people who understand the needs of the disabled ?..........especially wheelchair users.
My mum is a wheel chair user and I have been to some places that have advertised ease of access for wheelchairs and it has been a joke.........I need muscles in my spit to get the chair into some places that show the wheelchair icon

park381 · 31-03-2005, 14:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Acrylic-bob

Even factoring in the designers fee of £10K each only brings the cost up to £360K. That still leaves an awful lot unaccounted for.
And you can hardly say that MPA have been lavish with the publicity material.

May be that's a question Gayle could give us an answer to