Paedophiles and Chemical castration.

[Mick]

If this thread turns into a slanging match it will be closed so please get back on topic and please watch the bad language it is a family site and there are children on here.

[blazey]

Originally Posted by Royboy39

What a sad young lady.

Its sad that there are so many people in accy willing to commit murder. Thats what is sad. And for what is worth there are enough members on accy web for statistically one to be a paedophile. One lived next door to me and was caught for it but I dont remember feeling any anger on the scale of wanting to commit murder.

[Margaret Pilkington]

Originally Posted by blazey

Oh i could talk all day on the topic of paedophiles but the point is that Im not going to stoop low and ignore my educationb and my religion and say i'd be stupid enough to stoop to a paedophiles level and commit murder.

None of this makes any sense at all.

[blazey]

Originally Posted by mick

If this thread turns into a slanging match it will be closed so please get back on topic and please watch the bad language it is a family site and there are children on here.

I wouldnt have thought a topic discussing children being raped by adults and their parents killing them wouldnt be a suitable topic anyway for a family forum.

[blazey]

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

None of this makes any sense at all.

THE POINT IS:

I WONT STOOP AS LOW AS A PAEDOPHILE AND BECOME A DANGEROUS CRIMINAL

I WONT IGNORE MY EDUCATION AND DO SOMETHING OF SUCH SORTS
I WONT IGNORE MY RELIGION AND KILL ANOTHER HUMAN BEING

IS THIS SIMPLE ENOUGH FOR YOU.

[piltymon]

Originally Posted by blazey

I discussed the issue in the thread, the thread consists of rational ideas of solving the problem and committing murder. I think its pretty pointless overall.

Please do me the honour of not being a sarcastic old bag and kiss my ass. I dont want to be a part of this stupid brown nosing group, I came here because I thought it was worthwhile and it turned out to be a load of absolute bollocks. People in accy are stupid and irrational. It makes me feel ashamed to be part of such a society.

Margaret has show you nothing but patience and coutesy on this thread and treating her this way is very unfair.

[Tombraider]

on the subject of chemical castration can i ask a question? If you knew a known paedophile who had received this treatment, would you feel it is now ok to let them be near your children?

[Margaret Pilkington]

I'm sorry Blazey, I was under the impression you had had enough of the people on Accyweb and that you were leaving.
Murder......I don't recall talking about murdering anyone.
The thread is about Chemical castration for paedophiles.

[Margaret Pilkington]

As for what is suitable for a family forum......that is the job of the moderators to decide.

[piltymon]

I think that we should realise that with all crimes there are different levels of intent(mens rea), different levels of criminal behaviour and often there are mitigating circumstances(reasons for the offence). The law is not as black and white as people tend to think, far from it. You cannot say that a father who swats his son on the butt to get him to move a little faster should be punished the same way that we would punish an abductor that molests and murders a strangers child. Chemical castration may remove all sexual urges and indeed be a good idea as long as we are sensible. Paedophillia abhors me like it does a large amount of society. You don't let murderers off scot free but you also don't jail innocent people. Enough innocent people have been sent to jail to show that the legal system is imperfect. There will never be a clear cut answer to this topic and, people opinions will always differ. May I respectfully suggest that we leave it to the experts to decide? After all that's why they are called experts!

[Margaret Pilkington]

I cannot think of any mitigating circumstances for what paedophiles inflict on children.
No-one suggests that a father who swats his childs butt to make him get a move on will be considered a paedophile....although it is a recognised fact that some paedophilc actions arise from family members.
An Expert is a drip under pressure...or that is what I was always lead to believe.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by blazey

educationb

Lol!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
God help us all.



Resorting to personal abuse, especially to someone as fair minded as Margaret Pilkington, has just lost your argument even the minutest bit of credibility.

[piltymon]

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

I cannot think of any mitigating circumstances for what paedophiles inflict on children.
No-one suggests that a father who swats his childs butt to make him get a move on will be considered a paedophile....although it is a recognised fact that some paedophilc actions arise from family members.
An Expert is a drip under pressure...or that is what I was always lead to believe.

The point that I am trying to get accross is that there are different circumstances in EVERY case. I would happily sentence a paedophile that had been convicted beyond a reasonable doubt of say rape to death but, there are differences in each case. Where do you draw the line is my question?

Don't get me wrong I have no time or patience for paedophiles either.

[garinda]

I should imagine the start of the healing process of anyone abused as a child, would be that people believed them, and that justice was seen to be done.

[Margaret Pilkington]

It is not for me to draw the line...it is for the judiciary. Yes, every case is individual and should be treated as such......but a paedophile is a paedophile and as far as I can see he could argue until the sea ran dry but I would doubt any mitigating circumstances...even the citing of child abuse in his own back ground could not excuse his actions....there was one paedophile who tried to tell the courts that the children 'enjoyed it'.