Paedophiles and Chemical castration.

[blazey]

And if you want something to discuss, paedophiles make up a very low number in britains prisons but there is a significant rise in children sexually assaulted and raping others recently. by children I am referring to high school under 16's...

Do we kill those too?

[Margaret Pilkington]

Well at least no-one can say this thread is boring.

[***Mr D***]

You will never stop the dirty scum paedos, there are to many in high places.

Big crack down will drive them more under ground apparantly, like they arnt anyhow.

They should build a detention centre for just paedos, where life is hell, and they arnt treated much better than the rats what also live there, this is then a deterrant.

Branding also comes to mind. or some sort of tatoo. again a deterrant.

Obviously there are different levels of crime/paedos, Im after the hardcore, dangeress ones first get rid of them with STRONG punishment, not the pittance they get at the moment. in some cases I would approve the death sentence.

As for the Chemical castration, NOT GOOD ENOUGH for me as there will probably be a way round it by taking a different drug or in 5-10 years time they can all sue the goverment for millions due to side effects.

[piltymon]

Originally Posted by blazey

And if you want something to discuss, paedophiles make up a very low number in britains prisons but there is a significant rise in children sexually assaulted and raping others recently. by children I am referring to high school under 16's...

Do we kill those too?

I wonder if the rise in the statistics is because more are doing it or detection methods are improving! Just a thought.

[blazey]

Originally Posted by piltymon

I wonder if the rise in the statistics is because more are doing it or detection methods are improving! Just a thought.

I was actually rushing and made a typo though, it was meant to say a rise in childing sexually assaulting others children. Do we just kill those paedophiles aswell.

Paedophiles make up around 3% of those in prison, prison are mainly filled with people who have commited crimes such as theft, robbery, fraud etc.

[Less]

Originally Posted by blazey

Paedophiles make up around 3% of those in prison, prison are mainly filled with people who have commited crimes such as theft, robbery, fraud etc.

Yes, and your point is????? I think prisons should have 0% Paedophiles, string them up outside London Tower let them rot as an example to others that might be tempted! LEAVE INNOCENT CHILDREN ALONE!

[blazey]

Originally Posted by Less

Yes, and your point is????? I think prisons should have 0% Paedophiles, string them up outside London Tower let them rot as an example to others that might be tempted! LEAVE INNOCENT CHILDREN ALONE!

The point is adult paedophiles arent rising but the number of children who sexually abuse others is rising.

Do we kill those children aswell because they aren't 'innocent'

I have a really interesting article which also asks why we limit a childs sexual exploration and have even criminalised it but there are words and a picture that are part of the article that arent suitable for here and it takes intelligent open minded people to read it and actually take something from it.

Anyway why kill people when we have a medical solution? They arent going to be killed now with that available. That is unless the NHS fails society. Might as well kill the government whilst we're at it. You could be in charge if it makes you feel better. Put 21st century british history on the map as being medically capable of 'curing' paedofilic urges but resorting to acting like neanderthals (sp).

[Less]

Originally Posted by blazey

The point is adult paedophiles arent rising but the number of children who sexually abuse others is rising.

Do we kill those children aswell because they aren't 'innocent'

Typical idiot, moving the goal posts, whats up? do you feel this is a discussion you can't win? Take a look at the title of this thread, we aren't discussing children and children, we are talking about adults that should have no excuse and should know better, please grow up.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by Less

string them up outside London Tower

That's a stupid idea!

The ravens might peck and eat them, then die, and if the ravens ever leave the Tower of London we're all doomed, doomed I tell you.

[blazey]

Originally Posted by Less

Typical idiot, moving the goal posts, whats up? do you feel this is a discussion you can't win? Take a look at the title of this thread, we aren't discussing children and children, we are talking about adults that should have no excuse and should know better, please grow up.

A child is criminally liable from the age of ten, therefore is capable of sexually assaulting another child, the same as an adult can assault another adult or can assault a child.

I asked u a simple question about an issue within society which should concern u if u dont like the people who commit sexual offences.

Children ARE capable of making judgements over the age of 10, they arent stupid. The only reason we believe they arent capable is that our society suppresses them from making such judgements.

Children can have very dangerous criminal minds when they wish to act upon them, look at mary bell or thomson and venebles, are they not guilty just because theyre children?

[cashman]

if you want to discuss that,start another thread about it, typical lawyer mentality.

[piltymon]

Originally Posted by cashman

if you want to discuss that,start another thread about it, typical lawyer mentality.

Why? Why not let them run with it?

[cashman]

Originally Posted by piltymon

Why? Why not let them run with it?

you cant read either?

[piltymon]

Originally Posted by cashman

you cant read either?

Seems to me like Blazey made a good argument. I wouldn't argue with her but, then again, I'm smart!

[Tombraider]

Im all for the branding with a big P on their foreheads. Being a parent I know if one of my children got attacked the only time i would get a decents nights sleep would be when the offender is dead and buried.