Potential Labour Candidate for Hyndburn

[garinda]

Originally Posted by Less

Yes, he may have a hissy fit, perhaps because his user name doesn't have a capital 'G'!

Don't pick on the little lamb.

He's only just taken his 'victim' hat and mittens off.

[Less]

Originally Posted by garinda

Don't pick on the little lamb.

He's only just taken his 'victim' hat and mittens off.

Sorry Garry, oop's I mean rindy, erm Garinda, doh garinda.

[turkishdelight]

Originally Posted by garinda

...and besides, as you once foolishly tried to recruit a close relative of mine into joining a pyramid selling scheme, promising riches beyond one's wildest dreams, your ability to judge the true facts of a situation, I don't hold very much store by.

Unless of course you're posting on Accy Web from a mansion on a private island somewhere.

Then l may have to reconsider your gullibilty, and not hold your opinion in such low esteem.

This has no relevance in this forum. My ability to judge the facts worked very well for me at that time. Your entitled to your opinion of me. However your so wrong.I wonder why you always try to make it personal, what do you get from it. I would try never to offend or have a dig at you personally.
In my opinion this is stooping so low.

[Less]

Originally Posted by turkishdelight

In my opinion this is stooping so low.

I quite agree, but it begs the question...

garinda, how low can you get?

[shillelagh]

Originally Posted by andrewb

I think you should publish it now that the sender has given you permission. I'd like to know what it says that got you so excited.

Originally Posted by garinda

As a moderator on Accrington Web, do you really think you should be using your position to encourage other members to break clear forum rules?

Rules which seem fairly transparent, and make no mention of it being fine to publish, even with consent.

12: All posts on the forum to be made in English. If you wish to communicate in a foreign language, please do so on the PM system,also PM=PRIVATE MESSAGE and all pm's are just that Private and must not be posted on the forum no matter how old they are or who they are from.
http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...mer-29681.html

I'm sure you'd love my right to a democratic voice on here to be silenced, but I have no intention of aquiring a ban. So that isn't going to happen.

Originally Posted by andrewb

Garinda, that rule is in place to stop private conversations in PM from being spread from there, as one member may have sent a private message under the impression that it is indeed, private. As the sender has given his consent to that particular message being posted, there is no problem. As a moderator I can tell you now, you wont be banned.

Cashman, I haven't seen the PM. I've no idea if garinda sent it to others on request, but I didn't request it.

After numerous tellings off from mick ... i have been under the impression that pm's are private .. and not allowed on accyweb .. even if the sender gives his permission .. seeing as ive done that in the past and got a telling off about it as well.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by turkishdelight

This has no relevance in this forum. My ability to judge the facts worked very well for me at that time. Your entitled to your opinion of me. However your so wrong.I wonder why you always try to make it personal, what do you get from it. I would try never to offend or have a dig at you personally.
In my opinion this is stooping so low.

Make it personal?

After using my real name on here, without my consent?

Get real.

Any further evidence of your abilities, were formed in your first posts on here, when you said you didn't know who your councillors were, or how you could contact them.

So forgive me if I don't hold your opinion to judge this matter very highly.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by shillelagh

After numerous tellings off from mick ... i have been under the impression that pm's are private .. and not allowed on accyweb .. even if the sender gives his permission .. seeing as ive done that in the past and got a telling off about it as well.

Strange how rules can be 'bent' for some, but not for others, depending on who stands to benefit.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by Less

I quite agree, but it begs the question...

garinda, how low can you get?

When dealing with snakes, low.

Lower than a snake's belly low.

[Less]

Perhaps it's time the thread went back on track or am I going to have to invoke 'Godwin's Law'?

[garinda]

Originally Posted by turkishdelight

This has no relevance in this forum. My ability to judge the facts worked very well for me at that time. Your entitled to your opinion of me. However your so wrong.I wonder why you always try to make it personal, what do you get from it. I would try never to offend or have a dig at you personally.
In my opinion this is stooping so low.

No offence was intended.

I was merely giving factual evidence why I don't hold your judgement in particularly high esteem, since you've proffered your opinion on the matter of the pm, sent to me by mistake.

[andrewb]

Originally Posted by garinda

No they don't.

Rules are rules.

Such a flippant disregard for them is very telling.

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...-18823-36.html

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post777690

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post774125

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post774082

Need I go on? Stop being petty. It's not a 'flippant disregard'. All that is happening here is pettiness from you, using the rules when it suits you. Turkishdelight has called you by your name several times before, and you haven't batted an eyelid. It's just handy for you to use it now. As I say, report it if you feel you have a legitimate case. That is where rule breaks should be addressed.

[garinda]

Originally Posted by andrewb

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...-18823-36.html

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post777690

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post774125

http://www.accringtonweb.com/forum/f...tml#post774082

Need I go on? Stop being petty. It's not a 'flippant disregard'. All that is happening here is pettiness from you, using the rules when it suits you. Turkishdelight has called you by your name several times before, and you haven't batted an eyelid. It's just handy for you to use it now. As I say, report it if you feel you have a legitimate case. That is where rule breaks should be addressed.

They had my consent.

As Less posted, please can we now go back on thread.

Otherwise that is another rule broken.





Back on track...
I bet Graham Jones, plus all the other candidates, if they have any sense, are out canvassing right at this very minute.

[shillelagh]

By the way shouldnt this thread actually be closed now .. as its title is Potential Labour Candidate .. and as everyone knows Hyndburn & Haslingden Labour Party has decided on their candidate ..

[shillelagh]

Originally Posted by garinda

They had my consent.

As Less posted, please can we now go back on thread.

Otherwise that is another rule broken.





Back on track...
I bet Graham Jones, plus all the other candidates, if they have any sense, are out canvassing right at this very minute.

If they are they need their heads looking at .. as a someone who goes canvassing at regular intervals .. if you knock on anyones door after 7.30pm they normally give you what for!!!!

[andrewb]

Originally Posted by garinda

They had my consent.

As Less posted, please can we now go back on thread.

Otherwise that is another rule broken.

You gave Turkishdelight consent, and then removed it when it suited you? How petty and childish. If other people are using your name on Accyweb then you can't give and take consent depending on who might be writing it and whether they're agreeing with you at the time or not. The rule is in place to protect somebodies privacy. If your allowing some people to post your name on this public forum, then it is no less private if other people do the same. Do stop being so pathetic.