So all the Remoaners are now putting their hopes on another EU referendum and they tell us we need one because (second time around) we stupid, old, racists didn't know what Leave meant. Now, apparently we all do.
We only had a referendum because the political parties couldn't agree on anything about the EU. And the last two years has shown that they still can't. It seems Parliament can only offer a so-called 'no deal' [i.e. clean break] or staying in.
So, if there was to be another referendum, my view is that it should ask exactly the same question as before - do you want to leave or remain in the EU? No political chicanery with smart-arse options, splitting one side two or three ways. We now all know everything there is to know, so why ask a different question?
However, if the Remoaning MPs in both the Labour and Tory parties think a different but equally narrow result will end their agony, they must be more naïve than they seem.
Think about this analysis:
https://fullfact.org/europe/did-majo...eu-referendum/
This is why Komrade Korbyn, especially, and Theresa Maybe are desperate to avoid having another referendum
before a general election.
If there was another referendum first, which narrowly decided to remain, I suspect that not every person who voted leave, and felt betrayed, would continue to give their votes unthinkingly in the next a general election to either Labour or Conservative.
All it would take, as happened in France under Macron in less than one year, would be for a new pro-Brexit party to form in time for a general election. And we all know that for a party to win an election doesn't require 52% of a 72% voter turnout.
Nigel Farage for PM, anyone?