sack the incompetant - Page 5

Margaret Pilkington · 28-04-2006, 15:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by fireman

The trouble is when these sleeze bags do get the bullet or be forced to resign afew months later they re appear in a senior position with thir fantastic pension untouched. BLUNKET FOR INSTANCE.

The thing about Blunkett was, at least he had a very nice dog!

fireman · 28-04-2006, 15:37

I'll get him if he punches you pendy

SPUGGIE J · 28-04-2006, 15:39

If the level of incompitence continues like an infection throughout govenment how long before the warm brown smelly stuff is coating most Secetaries of State and ministers? If the gvnmnt had any commen sense they would drop the bad uns and try and get on with things that matter instead of fighting of scandels and sleaze. We need them to start thinking about the country not "were is the next gaff or sleaze shot coming from."

lettie · 28-04-2006, 16:25

If there are to be any resignations or sackings. Do you think that they can also get rid of Patricia (the NHS has never had it so good) Hewitt too?

Neil · 28-04-2006, 16:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

When the Charles Clarke fiasco hit the fan i wondered what item of news would be leaked to take the heat out of the situation...now I know!
However this woman could cavort(for want of a better term) with this chap beats me...even if you were blind, you wouldn't...would you?

What makes you think they really did do 'it'? The whole thing might just be a diversion away from Charles Clarke.

SPUGGIE J · 28-04-2006, 17:35

Well Clarkey is in the poo poo 5 of his "missing" deportee's have reofended what a suprise. Add to that Labour losing a by election up here (MSP) with a 9% reduction what will happen now? Will he keep his job?

Margaret Pilkington · 28-04-2006, 20:53

I am not really sure what you mean in your post Neil....but the point I was trying to make, was that the revelations about John Prescott seemed just a bit too pat......and I suspected that the news may have been released to take some of the heat out of the Charles Clarke fiasco......and it is a fiasco!

Margaret Pilkington · 28-04-2006, 20:56

Charles Clarke wants to clear up the 'mess' he has made of the situation...but if it hadn't been for an Audit Commission report he would still be sat on his hands. It is reported that he knew about the situation some 10 months ago and has only acted in the last two weeks.
Why should we believe that this man is capable of sorting out the situation?

cashman · 28-04-2006, 23:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by SPUGGIE J

Well Clarkey is in the poo poo 5 of his "missing" deportee's have reofended what a suprise. Add to that Labour losing a by election up here (MSP) with a 9% reduction what will happen now? Will he keep his job?

think accyweb bookies should take bets on this issue,(hint

) my moneys on the clown not seeing the bank holiday out.

SPUGGIE J · 29-04-2006, 09:22

Staying, going, fall on his sword, forced out sacked???

fireman · 02-05-2006, 17:18

Well they both, Clarke and Prescott, seem to be facing it out. The offenders are re offending and hopefully laying this pretence of a government open to a large law suit . Prescott is probably enjoying a cheap night out on his lover , with the proceeds from the tabliod press. Blair is in a corner developing a rather bad stammer. And we are out here paying all the idiots a bloody good salary for their wrong doings. Lifes a bitch.

SPUGGIE J · 02-05-2006, 23:02

Lets see if a set of bad results at the local elections might be the final push thats needed.