Sharia Law..... - Page 5

Margaret Pilkington · 23-02-2006, 14:11

There are very many incidences of crimes where the punishment doesn't seem to reflect the damage done to the victim......and criminals come in all colours and races......this really isn't what this thread is about.

Margaret Pilkington · 23-02-2006, 14:16

I suppose in both cases Mani, they will get similar sentences to the chap in Burnley...because that is the law, as you pointed out in an earlier post.
Ethnicity will not come into it.....and rightly so!

Phylum · 23-02-2006, 16:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by mani

i have just ****ed my sides laughin at the stupid racism of some ppl

esp phylum sorry dude i have to say it

the fact he got 12 weeks was cuz he didnt stop at the accident thus by the cps cudnt charge him with anythign related to the actual incident even though he admitted it.

its british law *not shariah* that says that the most he can b charged with is 12 weeks as he failed to stop at the scene of an accident

moral of the story? if u kill someone whilst driving stop 1 mile down the road - u'll b let off with just a 12 week sentance...

man phylum u seriously need to get some education... livin in cambridge sure hasnt made u any cleverer

l have an education thanks, that's where I learned to spell correctly, well, most of the time. Unfortunately I did not study law, silly me!

There are other things that should have been considered here. He was driving a stolen car, which probably meant he stole it. He had no tax, no insurance and killed child.

Racism? I merely suggested that the law is swayed so as not to upset certain groups.

BLACKBURN RAVER · 23-02-2006, 16:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phylum

l have an education thanks, that's where I learned to spell correctly, well, most of the time. Unfortunately I did not study law, silly me!

There are other things that should have been considered here. He was driving a stolen car, which probably meant he stole it. He had no tax, no insurance and killed child.

Racism? I merely suggested that the law is swayed so as not to upset certain groups.

HERE HERE........

lets not upset the minority in OUR country.....wheather he stopped or not he killed someone and should be punished for it...

english law needs a severe kick up the jacksie

SPUGGIE J · 23-02-2006, 23:51

Dosnt matter what law it is it will always look like it has failed to someone.

mani · 24-02-2006, 03:12

its not even about studying law - its about readin the story in detail as to why the judge only gave him such a little sentace...

outrage is when a judge gave those two ppl sexually abused that baby and only got somethign like 2 months

last time i think the law was swayed to not upset a group was when the nick griffin case went to a retrial

mani · 24-02-2006, 04:08

it actually horrifies me to be totally honest the reaction of some ppl at some of the stories on accy web...

mani · 24-02-2006, 04:18

edited.................

Phylum · 24-02-2006, 06:54

Quote:

and then when some mid-age woman comes on a site like accy web and says what if he was white i wonder what wud've happened then it does make u stop and think just how much is the race of a person playing on a persons mind.

I suggest you are sexist and ageist.

I also suggest that double standards are rife in this country.

chav1 · 24-02-2006, 10:49

ime a bit confused by somthing posted in this thread and i feel i need to speak up on the matter..

am i to understand that if i hit somone with my car and kill them then drive off i will get in less trouble than if i actualy stop and phone an ambulance for them...?

12 weeks in prison with the usual 50% off for good behaviour would be worth it to get rid of somone you realy realy didnt like

mani · 24-02-2006, 14:00

chav

totally true

now... where's that peter britcliffe...

and that isnt ageist and sexist thats calling as u see it...

arent profiles wonderful?

and u r one to talk about double standards

grannyclaret · 24-02-2006, 14:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phylum

This story made national news this morning. We saw it here in Cambridgeshire. I just have to ask this question. What do you think would have happened if this had been a white guy?

exactly..thats what i thought too...there would have been a lot more of a stink....:engsmil:

jambutty · 24-02-2006, 17:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by PILKYBUSDRIVER

If The "Rivers Of Blood" speech doesn't mention Rivers of Blood then why is it misquoted?What a person said nearly 40 years ago has come true and you sad people have not got the balls to admit that these ppl are making a mockery of our country.I have been called a white B*stard on several occasions in my home town,they have no regard for OUR law.They can't even drive a car without having a phone stuck to their earhole.(and then they don't know how to use indicators).All of you do good'ers will say i'm a nasty person for speaking my mind.THEY BELIEVE THERE IS ONLY ONE RELIGION>>>ISLAM.We are all fools to them.So if they want sharia law i'd gladly stone them and chop their hands off if they misbehaved.

Because people often put their own interpretation on what they hear or read.

Bogey never said, “Play it again Sam” and Captain Kirk never said “Beam me up Scottie” yet people still make the quotes.

At last people are beginning to wake up the fact that, like a creeping cancer, Islam is slowly taking over and will continue to do so until we stand up against it. If we are going to wait until the government in office takes a stand it will be too late.

Phylum · 24-02-2006, 18:59

Quote:

and that isnt ageist and sexist thats calling as u see it...

You see, one rule for one, one for the other...........

rogue · 27-02-2006, 15:23

hmmm
i been reading up on this lately,and find it disturbing and barbaric
go here for info
http://www.knowislam.info/drupal/

its about those who left their faith and saw the light,

imagine,
you will be stoned to death for adultary,or even having sex while unmarried,

"wake UP,,this is a modern world " I SAY

make up your own mind but its worth a read