Tory Tory Tory

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by West Ender

I'm mystified how a discussion of the nutritional properties of milk fits into this thread.

You and me neither West Ender, but its fun init

[garinda]

When the issues from 1971 has been fully discussed, perhaps the next item for topical debate could be the Suez Crisis?

[blazey]

Originally Posted by garinda

When the issues from 1971 has been fully discussed, perhaps the next item for topical debate could be the Suez Crisis?

\

I'm studying that for tomorrows exam.

I love EU law but hate it at the same time why why why lol .

[blazey]

Originally Posted by West Ender

I'm mystified how a discussion of the nutritional properties of milk fits into this thread.

Because people are discussing how taking it away would have caused many children to suffer with bone problems, when in reality, we know today that milk wouldn't have even made much of a difference, so it isn't really something that needs to be debated at all in my opinion.

[Royboy39]

Originally Posted by blazey

\
I love EU law but hate it at the same time why why why lol .

Probably i'ts because it is enacted with very little imput from this side of the water?

[blazey]

Originally Posted by Royboy39

Probably i'ts because it is enacted with very little imput from this side of the water?

What are you answering? My ambiguous 'why'?

I'm just saying why o I have to have an exam in it tomorrow though EU law is so very interesting. I'm pro-europe remember, so I love it

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by garinda

When the issues from 1971 has been fully discussed, perhaps the next item for topical debate could be the Suez Crisis?

Na the Boar War would be better

[cmonstanley]

Originally Posted by blazey

Because people are discussing how taking it away would have caused many children to suffer with bone problems, when in reality, we know today that milk wouldn't have even made much of a difference, so it isn't really something that needs to be debated at all in my opinion.

so why do we feed and why do mothers have milk to feed babies, does that mean the whole concept of the human body is wrong

[West Ender]

Originally Posted by garinda

When the issues from 1971 has been fully discussed, perhaps the next item for topical debate could be the Suez Crisis?

I'm one of the few on here who can, actually, remember it.

[West Ender]

Originally Posted by blazey

Because people are discussing how taking it away would have caused many children to suffer with bone problems, when in reality, we know today that milk wouldn't have even made much of a difference, so it isn't really something that needs to be debated at all in my opinion.

So, in essence, it doesn't fit at all. We all know that Margaret Thatcher was instrumental in stopping free milk to school children but that doesn't impinge on whether or not our resident Conservatives should propound their views here - or does it?

[cmonstanley]

typical when they are losing the arguement they try and change the subject..

[Royboy39]

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

typical when they are losing the arguement they try and change the subject..

Who...........

[Benipete]

Thats right, bring back unwanted memories.I was the unlucky one of triplets.Yes i was the one on the bottle.Maid up for it since mind.No i didn't spell maid rong.

[jaysay]

Originally Posted by Benipete

Thats right, bring back unwanted memories.I was the unlucky one of triplets.Yes i was the one on the bottle.Maid up for it since mind.No i didn't spell maid rong.

Thats nearly as old as the Suez Crisis Benipete

[blazey]

Originally Posted by cmonstanley

so why do we feed and why do mothers have milk to feed babies, does that mean the whole concept of the human body is wrong

Please read the information before commenting, it explains fully.