We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
There has been a lot of talk within the media over the last few weeks that people such as footballers are taking out injunctions to cover up affairs. Andrew Marr, the BBC political reporter is the first to admit that he used an injunction to hide an affair with a fellow journalist. The fact is these people are only able to take out these gaging orders because they are well off, do you think its right to use the law in this way. form my point of view I don't give a monkeys what other people do in the bedroom it has no affect on my life what-so-ever so I don't actually care less, but I do think its a bit much using the law to cover up your indiscretions, to me the answer lies in peoples own hands just "Don't Do It" if you don't want to get caught, end of story
totally agree with you John, what has anyones sex lives got to do with anyone else? newspapers are a bit like certain accywebbers 'gossips are us' you'd be amazed at what i have been told about the majority of accywebbers by a certain member, so what if a couple of members on here enjoy doing things on webcam, so what if someones house is an absolute state, so what if someone likes younger men, so what if people put on an illness just to claim benefits
what other people do in their private lives has nothing at all to do with anyone else, people who listen and believe everything gossips say are no better themselves
as for Andrew Marr, he's just a pratt
__________________
When people walk away from you, let them go... It doesn't mean they are bad people, it just means their part in your story is over
He is a hypocrite with a capital H......he would not think twice(as a journalist) to reporting if some other person had been found to have a sleazy background, yet he expects to apply different rules to his own indiscretions.
And Shaz and Gary.....ooh, you are so right about the woman being the one to take out the injunction.......I wouldn't ever want anyone to know that I had been 'intimate' with Andrew Marr......he's as 'fow' as a summons.
__________________ The world will not be destroyed by evil people... It will be destroyed by those who stand by and do Nothing. (a paraphrase on a quote by Albert Einstein)
so what if a couple of members on here enjoy doing things on webcam,
Hang on ! Let's not be too hasty here ! Of course there's evidence to back these insidious claims ? Surely ! (Please ) I mean we'd need to see the terrible depravity of course to make a balanced opinion ! Please PM immediately, websites, chat lines etc, so we can judge & re-judge, then maybe a final deliberation viewing before coming to any rash decisions in this matter, but if it's Jay in his Shreddies ! I could happily forgo viewing.
Seriously though it seems it's only the rich & famous who can circumvent their lack of standards & morals by waving wads of cash at the problem, justice should apply equally across the board to everyone, rich or poor & we should all be held accountable by our peers but that doesn't appear to be the case. As people say "Money talks".
Hang on ! Let's not be too hasty here ! Of course there's evidence to back these insidious claims ? Surely ! (Please ) I mean we'd need to see the terrible depravity of course to make a balanced opinion ! Please PM immediately, websites, chat lines etc, so we can judge & re-judge, then maybe a final deliberation viewing before coming to any rash decisions in this matter, but if it's Jay in his Shreddies ! I could happily forgo viewing.
Seriously though it seems it's only the rich & famous who can circumvent their lack of standards & morals by waving wads of cash at the problem, justice should apply equally across the board to everyone, rich or poor & we should all be held accountable by our peers but that doesn't appear to be the case. As people say "Money talks".
I regularly appear naked on the webcam.
I crochet for world peace.
I've received state funding to make a lovely wooly scarf, which will be big enough to go right around the world, and keep us all snuggly.
AAAAAAARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHH !!!!!! I had kinda hoped for more along the lines of Wanton Wives, Nympho Nannas or Awesome Aunties, with the occasional novelty rather rude fruit ! You know, your usual third rate sort of titillation (can I use that word in this context ? ) but thanks for the link I may well take a peek (when drunk)
Seems to me that if you can afford the massive cost of taking out these injunctions then fair enough...and this government are in the proccess of denying legal aid for the vast majority who may be wrongly accused ... one law for the rich, a different law for the less well off.. typical stuff!