Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric
"Learned" ... mmm, don't know about that ... but I have devoted (wasted?) a great deal of time and effort in the study of bibliography. So, I think I do know what I'm talking about.
Let's leave "Literature" for the moment. Say a particular thread were devoted to the "Pals", local war memorials, or the First World War in general. It would, no doubt, attract the attentions of, and comments from Retlaw. He would bring to the debate his compendious knowledge of the subject, the result of years of hard work and study. Would you suggest that he is "far too serious" to participate in the debate? Would you "tug forelock and [walk] away shaking [your] head"? I doubt it.
|
Just because you have 'wasted' a great deal of time in the study of bibliography we are supposed to believe that your opinion on what seem to me, to be academic tomes....(you know, the kind of thing you would
have to read if you were doing perhaps a University degree in Classical Literature)....Obviously, I have not read any of those titles you have quoted, so feel unable to comment adequately in an informed way......but you give the impression that your opinion is superior......When the thread was about a fictional childrens classic written in the late 19th century
(that is where the obfuscation came in, you quote stuff you know that most of us who post on here will have no knowledge of, so you can say pretty much what you like.......and because of your
self professed knowledge we must believe you).
As for the bit about Retlaw......no, I wouldn't say that he is 'far to serious'........this is mainly because he gives his information in a matter of fact, down to earth way....with no attempt to 'hang his knowledge out to dry'.......or to make other contributors to the thread feel that their opinion/education is lacking in gravity. I respect and trust what Retlaw says because he doesn't always tell us he is an expert....you can tell that he is purely on his answers.(no side to him)