Forced Vaccinations - Page 10

garinda · 04-09-2009, 12:10

See.

I knew some fourteen year old American nerd would have a rational explanation for this outrageous abuse.

BERNADETTE · 04-09-2009, 12:17

Surely the mods can't be held responsible for Life being in negative rep? Think it is this that gets the ban, maybe if he hadn't been so abusive to members he wouldn't have gone negative.

Less · 04-09-2009, 12:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D***

Didnt think I would get a answer.

Whats wrong can you not provide one? or was it a personal desission.

Funny how the regular members can take pops and insult other members, but hey thats OK. cause they are elite members, they know the mods with there mighty ban stick.

Yet another of your unsubstantiated 'Conspiracy Theories?', or do you have anything to back that up?

The person affected will have been informed of the reason for his ban, it is neither proper nor' polite for a mod' to broadcast to the world what the reasons are.

Or would you consider it to be o.k. to discuss the facts of this ban while the person is off line?

P.S. The Mod's & Admin have the final word on these decisions and do not need to be taken to account for it by any of 'we', the members.

***Mr D*** · 04-09-2009, 12:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

Yet another of your unsubstantiated 'Conspiracy Theories?', or do you have anything to back that up?

The person affected will have been informed of the reason for his ban, it is neither proper nor' polite for a mod' to broadcast to the world what the reasons are.

Or would you consider it to be o.k. to discuss the facts of this ban while the person is off line?

P.S. The Mod's & Admin have the final word on these decisions and do not need to be taken to account for it by any of 'we', the members.

Thats fine by me.

I wondered if it was automatic (based on negative rep) or whether it was for his behaviour (as he was a naughty boy).

Less · 04-09-2009, 12:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D***

Thats fine by me.

I wondered if it was automatic (based on negative rep) or whether it was for his behaviour (as he was a naughty boy).

Keep wondering or maybe you might find out, (Oooeer veiled threats? no tongue in cheek).

Margaret Pilkington · 04-09-2009, 12:31

I think he was offensive in his approach to members who had not abused him.....I consider myself broad minded and moderate, but I found his posts offensive.

cashman · 04-09-2009, 12:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by ***Mr D***

Didnt think I would get a answer.

Whats wrong can you not provide one? or was it a personal desission.

Funny how the regular members can take pops and insult other members, but hey thats OK. cause they are elite members, they know the mods with there mighty ban stick.

Pity "Brockhall" has closed.

***Mr D*** · 04-09-2009, 14:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Less

Keep wondering or maybe you might find out, (Oooeer veiled threats? no tongue in cheek).

???

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margaret Pilkington

I think he was offensive in his approach to members who had not abused him.....I consider myself broad minded and moderate, but I found his posts offensive.

I must agree his approach was not the best, but is this not what warnings are for?

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

Pity "Brockhall" has closed.

Missing friends?

Margaret Pilkington · 04-09-2009, 14:53

It is up to the moderators to decide what infringements deserve a warning/ban, and we have to respect their decision.....that is why they are moderators and we are not.

I have always felt that other peoples opinions were entitled to some respect...even though I might not subscribe to their version of the truth, but I feel that this person tried to insinuate that he was right and we were all imbeciles for not recognising that.

He can believe what he wants, it doesn't make it true.

andrewb · 04-09-2009, 16:55

It should really be blatantly obvious why he was banned. Could you imagine if all the posts on Accyweb were of the same format? I certainly wouldn't still be here.

garinda · 04-09-2009, 17:25

Gone, but not...

Damn.

Someone's snuffed out the candle of hope for whatsisname.

andrewb · 04-09-2009, 17:35

Rindi you missed a chance to beg for him back after what I just wrote

***Mr D*** · 04-09-2009, 17:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb

It should really be blatantly obvious why he was banned.

Not blatantly No, I was on the understanding that it may of been to having to much Negative Karma but I guess not.

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb

Could you imagine if all the posts on Accyweb were of the same format? I certainly wouldn't still be here.

Yes it would be terrible if all the subjects talked about where the same.

garinda · 04-09-2009, 17:51

Quote:

Originally Posted by andrewb

Rindi you missed a chance to beg for him back after what I just wrote

It's pointless.

I think he knew his time amongst us would be but a short time.

He knew it was ordained that the powers that be would silence his message.

It was all mapped out by the forces of darkness.

Mick · 04-09-2009, 18:13

Just to let you know i am not getting into this but "Life" has only a short ban not a full ban.
just how long that ban is well you will just have to wait and see