1000 Shares Issue!!! - Page 15

Tickler · 30-10-2009, 14:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

It is not one share that is on sale for £250. IT IS A SHARE PACKAGE. Read the notice. The package consists of one share, one shirt, one frame for the share, 10 match tickets and discount off hospitality packages and discount off in the club shop. The share in itself is probably £10. Work that out.

it was quoted in the paper yet again that 10% of the club was up for this share issue cant remember they guys name who had quit but that was said in the paper 10% of the club would be up for grabs in this share issue 1000 @£250 to me that means someone probably that o'neil ****** or Rob (i could'nt run a chip shop) Hayes has valued the club at 2.5 million it is simple realy when you work it out

Revived Red · 30-10-2009, 14:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug

The first comment I was been Sarcastic….Mr. Khan give us the information and people still question the actions of Rob Hays. Did he/Didn’t he…

Apologies, Doug. Missed the sarcasm.

JEFF · 30-10-2009, 14:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tickler

it was quoted in the paper yet again that 10% of the club was up for this share issue cant remember they guys name who had quit but that was said in the paper 10% of the club would be up for grabs in this share issue 1000 @£250 to me that means someone probably that o'neil ****** or Rob (i could'nt run a chip shop) Hayes has valued the club at 2.5 million it is simple realy when you work it out

Tickler - Please read the thread from the beginning. The share is valued at £10, this makes the club valued at £100,000. The package costs £250. The package consists of ONE SHARE = £10, ONE FRAME = £10, ONE SHIRT = £40, TEN TICKETS TO GAMES = £150, 10% OFF HOSPITALITY AND CLUB SHOP = £40, THIS TOTALS £250. It is simple really when you work it out.

Tealeaf · 30-10-2009, 14:47

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

Tickler - Please read the thread from the beginning. The share is valued at £10, this makes the club valued at £100,000. The package costs £250. The package consists of ONE SHARE = £10, ONE FRAME = £10, ONE SHIRT = £40, TEN TICKETS TO GAMES = £150, 10% OFF HOSPITALITY AND CLUB SHOP = £40, THIS TOTALS £250. It is simple really when you work it out.

.....But only on the assumption that the B shares have the same nominal value as the A shares.

Anyway, irrespective of the pigs bum that is the ASFC balance sheet, the biggest asset that ASFC has is the intangible one - namely, the "Goodwill" generated by the brand name. Unfortunatly, under current accounting standards an accurate valuation cannot be made for this.

VALAIRIAN · 30-10-2009, 17:17

Well this is another idiot that has paid for one!!!!! Remember it is for A.S.F.C. Not EW/DON!!!

shakermaker · 30-10-2009, 17:48

If Mr O'Neill had the best interests of Accrington Stanley in any form of priority he would've (failing the acceptance of the ASSF offer) donated a percentage of his own shares to be sold on as parts of packages; not used donated money to buy shares from another shareholder. A nice certificate to have on the wall or a club for the future? I know which one I'd prefer for Christmas.

DAV007 · 30-10-2009, 20:49

anyone who has purchases one of these shares going forward needs to hand themsleves into the the nearest mental asylum.

Outback Ozzy · 01-11-2009, 00:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007

anyone who has purchases one of these shares going forward needs to hand themsleves into the the nearest mental asylum.

I shall book myself into one for even contemplating buying one, know any good ones

JEFF · 02-11-2009, 11:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakermaker

If Mr O'Neill had the best interests of Accrington Stanley in any form of priority he would've (failing the acceptance of the ASSF offer) donated a percentage of his own shares to be sold on as parts of packages; not used donated money to buy shares from another shareholder. A nice certificate to have on the wall or a club for the future? I know which one I'd prefer for Christmas.

O'Neill hasn't got any shares to donate. Where is the money raised from this share issue going to go? Remember O'Neill has already given Whalley £100k to save the Club in 2008 and he wants his money back.

Bagpuss · 02-11-2009, 11:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

O'Neill hasn't got any shares to donate. Where is the money raised from this share issue going to go? Remember O'Neill has already given Whalley £100k to save the Club in 2008 and he wants his money back.

So don't buy the shares until we know what the future holds.

cashman · 02-11-2009, 12:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

O'Neill hasn't got any shares to donate. Where is the money raised from this share issue going to go? Remember O'Neill has already given Whalley £100k to save the Club in 2008 and he wants his money back.

if that is true, it obviously didn't happen, so why has o'neill not made this public knowledge,

possibly even call in the law.

Tickler · 02-11-2009, 13:14

anyone can access the companies house information and see who are directors of accrington stanley and get share issue information for a small fee

according to the information i got from companies house last week (cost me a £1) is that there are 6 directors and 2 secretarys of accrington stanley ltd and oneil or hayes are not on the list as either and eric whalley has been removed as a director from the 3rd august 2009 frank martindale had his directorship erminated on the 5th june 2009 so if the powers that be are in control how come they are not directors ??? am i missing something

probably

cashman · 02-11-2009, 14:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tickler

anyone can access the companies house information and see who are directors of accrington stanley and get share issue information for a small fee

according to the information i got from companies house last week (cost me a £1) is that there are 6 directors and 2 secretarys of accrington stanley ltd and oneil or hayes are not on the list as either and eric whalley has been removed as a director from the 3rd august 2009 frank martindale had his directorship erminated on the 5th june 2009 so if the powers that be are in control how come they are not directors ??? am i missing something

probably

Dunno Tickler

Perhaps aint directors so they can't resign.

Redash · 02-11-2009, 14:12

As far as I know.
If the company goes bust, the directors will be banned from holding a directorship elsewhere, so they can't start up a new company.
Also shar holders will be chased for the debt of the company.

Fourth official · 02-11-2009, 14:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tickler

anyone can access the companies house information and see who are directors of accrington stanley and get share issue information for a small fee

according to the information i got from companies house last week (cost me a £1) is that there are 6 directors and 2 secretarys of accrington stanley ltd and oneil or hayes are not on the list as either and eric whalley has been removed as a director from the 3rd august 2009 frank martindale had his directorship erminated on the 5th june 2009 so if the powers that be are in control how come they are not directors ??? am i missing something

probably

Nice picture of Frank in with the other Directors at Grimsby??? Don't understand then,if he is no longer a Director.Think he sits with D'On etc at home games as well