Accrington Web
   

Home Gallery Arcade Blogs Members List Today's Posts
Go Back   Accrington Web > Hobbies and Accy Sport > Accrington Stanley
Donate! Join Today

Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum.


Welcome to Accrington Web!

We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info.
You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-05-2005, 12:36   #16
Senior Member+
 
Tin Monkey's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

Adam stated that in his opinion, Stanley stood no chance of being promoted next season, as there are much better teams in the Conference. I may have paraphrased slightly, but that's pretty much the gist of it.

You can not defend such a statement in my opinion, whether you are paid for your work or not. Deleting the statement does not atone for making it and as an aspiring journalist you should know better. When you work for the media (paid or otherwise), your views are always taken seriously and in this case it's no different. If I posted something like you did, then so what? Who cares what I think? However, for you it's different. You are the official Stanley voice of Radio Lancashire and it is not acceptable for someone in your position to make such feelings known. Not only is it plainly wrong, but it is also extremely unprofessional! OK, so maybe you aren't paid for your radio work, but do you want to be seen as unprofessional in your aspiring future career?

You state that you do care about the club? So why make such a potentially damaging statement on an internet messageboard? You need to think very carefully before posting such things on a public internet forum.
__________________
T.M.
Tin Monkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Accrington Web
Old 09-05-2005, 13:48   #17
Full Member
 
Adam Cottier's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Monkey
Adam stated that in his opinion, Stanley stood no chance of being promoted next season, as there are much better teams in the Conference. I may have paraphrased slightly, but that's pretty much the gist of it.
what I meant was that the league title is beyond Stanley. not promotion. This is so OTT
__________________
Adam Cottier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 16:53   #18
Full Member
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tin Monkey
However, this raises a serious point. Why are Stanley constantly fobbed off with journalists who couldn't care less about the club? In my opinion I don't think we've had a 100% pro-Stanley journalist covering the club since the days of Chris Llloyd on the Observer. Surely we deserve better than what we've got? Discuss.
Tin Monkey, I don't know how you can say that Dany and Suzanne couldn't care less about the Stanley. Apart from which, their individual styles of writing are much better than what I remember of Chris Lloyd.

Stanleybabe
__________________
Life's a game, FOOTBALL is serious!!!
stanleybabe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2005, 16:53   #19
Full Member
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

Some one posted elsewhere complaining too much was on the forum concerning Barrow. He should have said it about this resident nonentity.
qualtrough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 06:36   #20
Senior Member
 
DanTheMonkey's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

Stanley DO Get Good Press , But Only In The Observer , Nothing Much In The Telegraph
DanTheMonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 06:57   #21
Senior Member+
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanTheMonkey
Stanley DO Get Good Press , But Only In The Observer
They've just upgraded their Stanley pages . Have a look at http://www.accringtonobserver.co.uk/sport/stanley/. You may have to change it in your favourites.

Downside:it looks like all the links in the fishy site match reports will need changing!

Last edited by MikeA; 11-05-2005 at 07:05.
MikeA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 07:21   #22
God Member
 
KIPAX's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeA
They've just upgraded their Stanley pages
excellent stuff.. looks good... not too keen on the pop up adverts though.. or the following..


Quote:
www.accringtonstanley.co.uk - Stanley's superb official website - many thanks to webmaster Rob Heys for permission to use some of the site's content
I feel an email of complaint coming along..............
__________________
Photographer : www.kipax.com
KIPAX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 07:25   #23
God Member
 
KIPAX's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

Actually the more I read.. the less impressed I am... Kit colours wrong.... Club honours out of date... club records out of date.... oooer this email to the observer is geting bigger and bigger
__________________
Photographer : www.kipax.com
KIPAX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 10:36   #24
Senior Member+
 
sparkie's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

I have to say the most worrying thing for me on this particular site is in the squad section where it states that we have two goalkeepers at the club, Danny Alcock and Paul Crichton.

I was under the impression that as the season had ended so had The almighty shyt-one's obligation to the club!!!

Please tell me he's not coming back, I don't think i could take another season or even half a season of his blunders.

Last edited by sparkie; 11-05-2005 at 10:37.
sparkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 12:37   #25
God Member
 
harwood red's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

I can almost see the steam coming out of your ears at the thought of Rob being the webmaster kippax. As for the crichton blunder if he comes back I'll go and support Morecambe!!!! Would that be a strong enough protest??
__________________



I know this may come as a shock but believe it or not all views I may air on here are my own work!!!!!
harwood red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 12:54   #26
God Member
 
KIPAX's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

nearly as annoying as people using two Ps in KIPAX ........................
__________________
Photographer : www.kipax.com
KIPAX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 14:08   #27
Senior Member+
 
Bazf's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

The second P is silent,as in Bath
__________________

Bazf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 14:09   #28
Senior Member+
 
Willie Miller's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

What about 3 KiPPPax!
__________________



The Voice of the Terrace

www.stanleyultras.co.uk



Willie Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 14:54   #29
rob
Full Member
 
rob's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

chill out tonny...
rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2005, 15:16   #30
God Member
 
KIPAX's Avatar
 

Re: Are we being fair to Management

sorry webmaster
__________________
Photographer : www.kipax.com
KIPAX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply




Other sites of interest.. More town sites..




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:40.


© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.1