 |
|
|
|
||||||||
| Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
Welcome to Accrington Web! We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today! |
3Likes |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
11-02-2025, 19:26
|
#1 |
|
Full Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Liked: 148 times
Rep Power: 2504
|
At Bantams
No Whalley?
And no Coyle either. |
|
|
| Accrington Web | |
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 19:34
|
#2 | |
|
God Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Accrington
Posts: 9,751
Liked: 4034 times
Rep Power: 701718
|
Re: At Bantams
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 19:45
|
#3 |
|
God Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 7,071
Liked: 918 times
Rep Power: 1125978
|
Re: At Bantams
..Brave man Greger...
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 20:05
|
#4 |
|
God Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 7,071
Liked: 918 times
Rep Power: 1125978
|
Re: At Bantams
*&%^^&$%#*&*^(&*%^$^$%o(p*)o*i&^
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 20:08
|
#5 |
|
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Liked: 148 times
Rep Power: 2504
|
Re: At Bantams
I was not at fault, but Crellin might have been. Good strike, but straight at him.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 20:17
|
#6 |
|
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Liked: 148 times
Rep Power: 2504
|
Re: At Bantams
Rawson injured. Off.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 20:47
|
#7 |
|
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Liked: 148 times
Rep Power: 2504
|
Re: At Bantams
We are fighting as always, but are uncomfortable going forward. Ben Woods had a good strike early, otherwise pretty grey. Bradford are better of course, but have also created very little.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 20:54
|
#8 | ||
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10,676
Liked: 2688 times
Rep Power: 3248623
|
Re: At Bantams
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
JCFG 19 Years in the Football League 308
|
||
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 20:55
|
#9 |
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10,676
Liked: 2688 times
Rep Power: 3248623
|
Re: At Bantams
Batty - just about - limped off........
__________________
JCFG 19 Years in the Football League 308
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 21:16
|
#10 |
|
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Liked: 148 times
Rep Power: 2504
|
Re: At Bantams
Think we have pickup up. Henderson and Grant doing well since they came on. Henderson even hit the bar.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 21:46
|
#11 |
|
God Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 7,071
Liked: 918 times
Rep Power: 1125978
|
Re: At Bantams
Dam. Going to golf course to take out frustration on a little white ball.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 22:11
|
#12 |
|
Full Member+
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Ramsbottom, Bury
Posts: 950
Liked: 332 times
Rep Power: 107936
|
Re: At Bantams
We were the better side second half and deserved a draw at the very least.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 22:21
|
#13 |
|
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Liked: 148 times
Rep Power: 2504
|
Re: At Bantams
At the very least? On one shot?
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 22:32
|
#14 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Huncoat
Posts: 1,227
Liked: 504 times
Rep Power: 1514
|
Re: At Bantams
what Bull**** Greger ...Stanley 6 shots Bradford 5 both teams 1 on target Stanley 52% - 49%.Why not try getting behind the team?
Last edited by Chubbyman; 11-02-2025 at 22:35. |
|
|
|
|
11-02-2025, 22:59
|
#15 |
|
Full Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 315
Liked: 148 times
Rep Power: 2504
|
Re: At Bantams
I've been behind this team for 50 years!
But that does NOT mean I have to like defeats. We improved in the second half but to say that we deserved to WIN is absolute nonsense. Nil (0) shots on goal in the second half is what the stats say, I say one (1) because Henderson's shot was close. I liked what I saw of Grant and Henderson in the second half, and we were a lot more positive in the second half than we have been for some time. O'Brien did OK, too. An improvement, yes. But great we were not. Last edited by Greger; 11-02-2025 at 23:03. |
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:05.
