|
Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
|
12-10-2008, 11:39
|
#46
|
God Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 6,522
Liked: 367 times
Rep Power: 3484
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCR ADIM
but if you dont make mistakes how do you learn?
|
We must be learning like a mothabitch.
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 11:41
|
#47
|
God Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 6,522
Liked: 367 times
Rep Power: 3484
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
Quote:
Originally Posted by accybantam
Well said - I was impressed with Accy Stanley today and agreed with Staurt McCalls after match comments where he felt for Accy and agreed City were fortunate to say the least.
What surprises me, reading this forum, is the focus being put on the substitution as the area of blame. Firstly Andy Procter - I thought he was your best player by some way when you beat us at Valley Parade last year and had heard there were other clubs quite interested in him ? If the lads coming back from injury it seems a pretty sensible substitution at 2-0 up with 10 minutes to go to get him back on the park. There weren't howls of derision at the time and infact i recall pretty rapturous applause. Easy to be the 9 o'clock jury. So I'm not convinced that slating Procter and/or the Manager is justified. If we played 100 10 minute games against you giving you a 2 goal start chances are that was the one in a hundred where that would happen.
Good luck rest of the season.
|
The grumbles over the substitution are because of who was taken off rather than who was brought on.
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 12:00
|
#48
|
Full Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: burnley
Posts: 356
Liked: 1 times
Rep Power: 100
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
your quote,if you don,t make mistakes ,how do you learn.how many do you want before we fall back into non league ?
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 15:39
|
#49
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pie eating country again
Posts: 4,659
Liked: 442 times
Rep Power: 63677
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
I cannot believe how many have said we played well for 80 minutes and lost it in the last 10!! The game of football is played over 90 minutes and if we cannot do that then we have no chance of staying in the league. Yes we murdered Bradford yesterday and I must say that is the best football I have seen at the FES in a long time, but it is no good blaming the manager or the substitute for the loss. Even after Proccy came on we looked like we could score again and I said to a mate at 2-0 I think we need another to kill the game and put it to bed. It was not to be and believe me I hate it. If we can play like we did today against Bradford for the full 90 minutes plus any added on time, we should do OK against Luton next week. As for the Morecambe game, we will pick it up as we always do against them, local rivalry and all that. I think it is time for the likes of Captain Cav and Rocky to say goodbye to the club, and I agree with others that Griffiths would be a useful acquisition, but he needs to show more team fight i.e. pass to other attackers not try to take on 3 or 4 defenders at a time. He is young and will learn though. Cav and Rocky have given the club sterling service over the years but in both cases, they have come back from injury and they are not the players they used to be, unfortunate I know, but that's how it is. Nice to see a decent crowd and no, Bradford did not outnumber us - figures are 1505 for Bradford and 1507 for Stanley. Lets keep the faith with the management unless someone else is available who could do the job with little or no money. If we are to change the management, it would have to be with someone who knows the loan market inside out, because unless a sugar daddy comes and takes over from Eric and bankrolls the club, it aint going to happen.
__________________
Piston broke owd geezer, Stanley supporter and shareholder, Retired and loving it Addendum, the views I express on here are my own, if you don't like them: TOUGH!
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 16:41
|
#50
|
Junior Member+
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 12
Liked: 0 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
I was at the game and can't believe we lost it. I thought we were playing great until Ryan went off. I thought Cav was at fault once again. He is getting booked too many times and giving away pointless free kicks and one that cost us on Saturday.
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 18:40
|
#51
|
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 35
Liked: 9 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
I totally am amazed at the Coleman substitution....the maxim is if it don't need fixing.....etc...Ryan was playing exceptionally well and causing a lot of problems for their defence....Proctor came on ..not up to speed got caught in possession near their corner flag...ball went down the other end Boulding scores and ALL that HARD WORK the team had put in evaporated....Someone said to me that the mini training session at half time was stupid..Coleman said it was to keep them focused ...well...THAT mini 10 minute session could have caused the LACK of focus for the last 10 mins....same person also wondered whether another bet had been placed...What odds that.....such a good game was thrown away..
Bradford fans all went home laughing all the way to the Bradford and Bingley bank:-)
Whilst I went home gutted and devastated..............
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 18:47
|
#52
|
Accy Red
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevo
Coleman said it was to keep them focused ...well...THAT mini 10 minute session could have caused the LACK of focus for the last 10 mins....same person also wondered whether another bet had been placed...What odds that.....
|
FFS now this is getting totally stupid, I'm not a massive Coleman fan but this post is beyond me. The half time kickabout maybe did work because we scored a 2nd goal while Bradford looked still cold and as for the betting comment have some neg karma you idiot.
Then again you might be a troll !!!
__________________
"At a football club, there's a holy trinity - the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don't come into it. They're only there to sign cheques." - Bill Shankly
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 19:02
|
#53
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10,477
Liked: 2633 times
Rep Power: 2924595
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 19:07
|
#54
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,421
Liked: 177 times
Rep Power: 14540
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
Quote:
Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN
|
I'd say Clayton End mate, not just Ultras, anyone who joined in were immense too
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 19:13
|
#55
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10,477
Liked: 2633 times
Rep Power: 2924595
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
My Apologies Willie You Are Quite Correct Almost All Of The Clayton End Were To Be Proud Of As Were The Stanley!
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 19:13
|
#56
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,281
Liked: 995 times
Rep Power: 11935
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
Does anyone have a spare caps lock key that isn't sticking ?
|
|
|
12-10-2008, 19:38
|
#57
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: On another planet.
Posts: 11,865
Liked: 1217 times
Rep Power: 144709
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Willie Miller
I'd say Clayton End mate, not just Ultras, anyone who joined in were immense too
|
Quite right...proud to be a Clayton Ender yesterday!
__________________
|
|
|
13-10-2008, 09:10
|
#58
|
Resting In Peace
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,084
Liked: 1 times
Rep Power: 2023
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
10 mins to go, 2-0 up and coasting. Why change it. Why take off Jimy Ryan and bring on Procky and put him on the right wing. Any sensible manager would either have left it as it was or if determined to make a substitution, take off a striker and bring on a defender, or even bring on a midfielder (Procky) and play five across the middle. I cannot understand bringing on Procky and playing him on the wing. As for Cav, he was posted missing from his full back spot for most of the game (as usual). Bradford attacked us down their left with ease, this was made easier by taking off Ryan and bringing on Procky. Last week at Barnet, Coley takes off Murdock and brings on Rocky, about ten minutes later Rocky had conceded a penalty and been sent off (another brilliant substitution by the football genius). I blame Coley for the defeat by Bradford and if we are relegated by three points I will blame him for Stanley losing their Football League status. Jobs for the boys- Rocky, Procky and Cav. Procky probably got his appearance bonus for coming on for the last ten minutes. Rocky probably got his appearance bonus at Barnet for giving away a penalty and getting sent off. Why change the team just for the sake of it. Come on Coley admit it YOU MADE A MISTAKE, don't blame the ref, don't blame the players - IT WAS YOUR FAULT. Oh by the way, I hope you enjoyed your birthday after you spoiled my week-end.
|
|
|
13-10-2008, 10:32
|
#59
|
God Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Great Harwood
Posts: 2,087
Liked: 8 times
Rep Power: 531
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
one substitution changed the game and that was theirs, they chucked barry conlon on and that changed the balance of the game, they threw everything at us and our defence switched off for 10 minutes...and for anyone who thinks that coleman does not care for this club.... KIP_2795.jpg :: Accy v Bradford City
Play like that every week and we would win more games than we will lose
__________________
The Voice of the Terrace
|
|
|
13-10-2008, 11:12
|
#60
|
Resting In Peace
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,084
Liked: 1 times
Rep Power: 2023
|
Re: Clueless substitution?
Quote:
Originally Posted by John_Timmins
one substitution changed the game and that was theirs, they chucked barry conlon on and that changed the balance of the game, they threw everything at us and our defence switched off for 10 minutes...and for anyone who thinks that coleman does not care for this club.... KIP_2795.jpg :: Accy v Bradford City
Play like that every week and we would win more games than we will lose
|
Conlon came on after 60 minutes. How did that change the game, please explain. The game changed with ten minutes to go. Stanley made their substitution with ten minutes to go, what a coincidence. What I am saying is why make a substitution when everything is going right. If Coley was determined to make a substitution why not take off a striker and bring on a defender. You say you noticed that Conlon changed the game, if so, why did Coley not bring on a defender to stop the game changing or did he not notice that the game had changed since Conlon came on, if he didn't then according to you he wasn't doing his job right. Nobody says that Coley does not care for the club, but caring for a club and managing a club are two different things. All the Stanley fans care for the club but they would not make good managers. Two games in succession Coley has made substitutions that have cost us the game and anybody who says different isn't watching the same games as I am. Three times last season we lost games after leading 2-0, any other team would have put up the defence and held on to their lead, but not Coley, he wants to score three or four, we need a change of tactics to hold on to a lead. Four times this season we have scored first and finished up losing, it can't continue. I will say it again there is only one person responsible COLEY, his team, his tactics, his substitutions, his football genius. I clicked on your link to the picture of Coley, can you not read his lips? I am sure he is saying "Why did I make that substitution"
Last edited by lindsay ormerod; 13-10-2008 at 19:17.
Reason: asterisked swearing
|
|
|
Other sites of interest.. |
More town sites.. |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:03.
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com
|
|