|
Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
|
07-08-2008, 08:55
|
#1
|
God Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Up Bash
Posts: 7,827
Liked: 44 times
Rep Power: 4388
|
Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
BBC SPORT | Football | My Club | Rotherham | Rotherham set to lose 17 points
Basically, Rotherham and Bournemouth to get 17 point penalties for financial issues
So with Luton on -30 and 2 other clubs on -17 it surely must be harder to get relegated than to stop up in League 2 this year.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 10:42
|
#2
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pompey
Posts: 3,217
Liked: 1342 times
Rep Power: 107482
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by entwisi
It surely must be harder to get relegated than to stop up in League 2 this year.
|
This is Stanley, we can do anything
__________________
Zero Tolerance of Intolerance
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 10:52
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,784
Liked: 192 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
We're always up for a challenge
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 12:46
|
#4
|
Resting In Peace
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,084
Liked: 1 times
Rep Power: 2023
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by entwisi
|
Last season Rotherham had ten points deducted and still finished 9th on 64 points (eight places and thirteen points above Stanley)
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 14:26
|
#5
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
also leeds had -30 last season n finished in play offs.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 14:35
|
#6
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Down 'Amnesia Alley !'
Posts: 2,913
Liked: 1559 times
Rep Power: 115701
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman
also leeds had -30 last season n finished in play offs.
|
So then this is no time for us all to go on a 'chicken-counting' Safari Cashy is it ?...I've got my Rose-tinted ones on again, but the vista which is Season 2008/9 still fills me with trepidation!!...
'It's by watching that we observe things'..... Alfred.E.Neumann.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 15:05
|
#7
|
Full Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 554
Liked: 3 times
Rep Power: 56
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
No, Cashy. Leeds started on -15. Still proves that deductions can be overcome though.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 17:13
|
#8
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pompey
Posts: 3,217
Liked: 1342 times
Rep Power: 107482
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
Last season, 8 teams (top 7 plus Rotherham) would have survived a 30 point deduction (20 more in Rotherham's case) and 14 would have got away with losing 17 points. But in 05/06, the numbers would have been 3 and 7 respectively, as there was much less of a points spread in the final table - the relegated teams getting 45 and 49 points that year, compared with 40 and 42 last year.
So it looks like Luton, at least, will have to be close to promotion standard to have much of a chance to survive. And that will obviously depend on what sort of money the new owners make available.
__________________
Zero Tolerance of Intolerance
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 17:40
|
#9
|
Accy Red
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimer
the relegated teams getting 45 and 49 points that year,
|
Does that mean we need only 33 pts to be in with a chance of not being relegated?
__________________
"At a football club, there's a holy trinity - the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don't come into it. They're only there to sign cheques." - Bill Shankly
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 18:31
|
#10
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pie eating country again
Posts: 4,659
Liked: 442 times
Rep Power: 63677
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagpuss
Does that mean we need only 33 pts to be in with a chance of not being relegated?
|
No it means we must cater for an extra 800 seats to stay in the division regardles of how many points we have
__________________
Piston broke owd geezer, Stanley supporter and shareholder, Retired and loving it Addendum, the views I express on here are my own, if you don't like them: TOUGH!
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 21:07
|
#11
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldgobbin
No, Cashy. Leeds started on -15. Still proves that deductions can be overcome though.
|
ya know i said that,but the guy i was talking too insisted it was -30, the moral here is never listen to a DINGLE.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 21:18
|
#12
|
God Member
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman
ya know i said that,but the guy i was talking too insisted it was -30, the moral here is never listen to a DINGLE.
|
Think leeds got deducted 15 pt the season before when they got relegated with 15 pts deducted for the start of last season
__________________
ACCRINGTON STANLEY FC We few, we happy few, we band of brothers
Last edited by mab; 07-08-2008 at 21:21.
|
|
|
07-08-2008, 21:56
|
#13
|
Full Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Barnoldswick
Posts: 453
Liked: 0 times
Rep Power: 41
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
In reality, we should not go down, like already mentioned 33 pts would keep us up, as 50 was the target last season when all teams started equal, so if 2 teams are starting -17 then i really can`t see us being in a relegation battle, if for some reason we are then the season will be really bad, but i think that things are looking better this season than last so i`m looking forward to a better season, keep the faith.
__________________
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 16:19
|
#14
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pompey
Posts: 3,217
Liked: 1342 times
Rep Power: 107482
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
It's fair to say Luton's survival target is 80 points won, and Bournemouth's and Rotherham's is 67, but you can't turn that around and say 33 will be enough to keep us up - that's only true if two of the penalised teams are amongst the worst teams. If they all get, say, 60 points which is about average, the trapdoor will be at 43....
__________________
Zero Tolerance of Intolerance
Last edited by Chimer; 08-08-2008 at 16:25.
|
|
|
08-08-2008, 17:16
|
#15
|
God Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Red and White Fortnight
Posts: 9,110
Liked: 1555 times
Rep Power: 12675
|
Re: Harder to be relegated than to stay up?
I think that a few other teams will struggle to put points on the board without the 'pressure' of another couple of teams around them.
It will be six weeks before Rotherham or Bournemouth can start to put any actual points on the board. And it is not inconceivable that a team or two can go six weeks without registering a win. I personally would forget all about Lton, if they get anywhere near 80 points then they fully deserve to stay up, but Rotherham and Bournemouth are a different story altogether. Both of those teams should expect to finish in the sixties so both pose us a problem.
|
|
|
Other sites of interest.. |
More town sites.. |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:35.
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com
|
|