How many points/position. - Page 2

kerrie l · 06-07-2006, 21:22

:engsmil: 5th and 96 points ................if watford can do it and northampton town, why not stanley :engsmil:

norwich stanley · 06-07-2006, 21:48

if stanley get 96 points they wont finish 5th.

maccawozzagod · 06-07-2006, 21:58

53 points 16th place. Hereford will be deducted points for fielding a player with no international clearance and will finish bottom. They will go down with the Dons.

Quakerz · 08-07-2006, 12:12

17th, 54 points.

Tracker · 09-07-2006, 08:47

Hereford will be deducted points for fielding a player with no international clearance and will finish bottom.
can't see that happening we havn't bought any players off you.

zayno14 · 09-07-2006, 09:16

Hmm thats funny, i don't remember anybody BUY anyone of us and then go on to be found out that he has no international clearance...

sparkie · 09-07-2006, 13:26

1 point more than the team in 18th would do me just fine.

Urban Spaceman · 10-07-2006, 18:02

Very difficult to predict at this stage of the game, not knowing all our signings nor the relative strength of the opposition.I would be very happy with a top half position (I think we have to be realistic in our first season in this division), so I would say 12th with 60 points.

As long as we don't get relegated (and I don't for one moment think that we will), I will be very happy !

Tracker · 11-07-2006, 16:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by zayno14

Hmm thats funny, i don't remember anybody BUY anyone of us and then go on to be found out that he has no international clearance...

the Altringham affair ring any bells.

to be fair its not entirely the same thing but you see what i mean?

shakermaker · 11-07-2006, 16:21

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tracker

the Altringham affair ring any bells.

to be fair its not entirely the same thing but you see what i mean?

That player was not bought off us smart arse.
We released him & he was signed by Alty.

NOT our problem.

sparkie · 11-07-2006, 17:02

we didn't even release him as such, he was only a trialist, never signed forms and he was ****e so was told to sling his hook!!!

Tracker · 11-07-2006, 21:18

do i detect a little bit of a bite here folks.

ossyclogger · 11-07-2006, 22:43

No, Just the truth, we never signed him so we couldn't pass him on to anyone.

Tracker · 12-07-2006, 04:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by ossyclogger

No, Just the truth, we never signed him so we couldn't pass him on to anyone.

ok conceded but you were close ,just a bit ,perhaps,maybe?

Kiwi John · 15-07-2006, 18:21

Here's the estimates so far...

Kiwi John... 59 12
Shakermaker... 111 1
Waltergalbraith... 67 10
Claytonender ... 56 14
K.S.H. ... 61 10
norwichstanley... 72 7
Outback Ozzy... 82 5
kerrie... 96 5
maccawozagod... 53 16
Quakerz... 54 17
Urban Spaceman... 60 12

KIPAX,bigal,glosterred,Tracker,AccyMad,Ukcowboy,ja ytee & Sparkie have yet to decide on a 'difinative estimate'(??-sounds strange).Still plenty of time....