Leam Richardson - the worst manager in Stanley's history?

DAV007 · 16-02-2013, 21:17

Worst in our league history or worst in our all time history?

DAV007 · 16-02-2013, 21:31

To clarify, by worst I am refering to his points total to games ratio.

Alvin the chipmunk · 16-02-2013, 21:34

Regardless of points ratios I believe a certain Welsh lollipop man would probably contest that honour.

lancsdave · 16-02-2013, 21:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alvin the chipmunk

Regardless of points ratios I believe a certain Welsh lollipop man would probably contest that honour.

That was a strange way of wishing him Happy 60th birthday today

Haggis316 · 16-02-2013, 22:30

How did you know it was his birthday?

Redraine · 16-02-2013, 23:39

Bottom of the form!

The Football League | Stats | Current Form

Revived Red · 17-02-2013, 00:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007

Worst in our league history or worst in our all time history?

It's quite sad that there are some people who must waken up each morning and say to themselves "I wonder how negative I can be today?"

DAV007 · 17-02-2013, 08:03

Quote:

Originally Posted by Revived Red

It's quite sad that there are some people who must waken up each morning and say to themselves "I wonder how negative I can be today?"

Its not negative, I am being realistic.
We are sleep walking into relegation under the excuse of 'loyalty' to a manager who is not delivering.
Leam has bee a good servant to the club, but the FACTS show his reign as manager to be a disaster.

This is not about being anti Leam, no Stanley fan could be anti Leam, he is a nice bloke who has worked hard for the club.
But we are in a race to the bottom, and the only thing we are able to change to see an improvement is the manager.

Coleman and Bell would keep us up, but the longer we leave it, the games are ticking away, the points are not being collected and our rivals are making gains.

You may not like the FACTS, but they speak alot louder than any words on a forum.

ddevil2006 · 17-02-2013, 08:34

nah it has to be Alty/Styring's effort in the early 90's

rude-dog · 17-02-2013, 09:07

It's ok saying Coleman and bell wud keep us up but does any1 know if they wud be actually interested in taking over. It wud be a huge gamble for them in my opinion. Coming into a very grave situation with no funds to bring in fresh talent. If they where to oversee a relegation there reputation wud suffer a lot. Whilst I agree that something has to give soon to keep on harping on about Coleman and bell just smells like some1 with an agenda

DAV007 · 17-02-2013, 09:11

Yes,
I have an agenda.
An agenda of keeping stanley in the football league.

accybeme · 17-02-2013, 09:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007

To clarify, by worst I am refering to his points total to games ratio.

Yep strictly on points to ratio of games played I think you may be correct in saying Leam has the worst record, but that does not make him automatically the worst manage in Stanley’s history, there are a lot more statistics to take into account for the run of bad form, the obvious fact is the balance of payments that restrict the acquirement of quality players, the only circumstances for criticising the manager can be on No. 1 tactics No. 2 team choice No. 3 motivation of the players, on tactics and motivation, I have trust in the manager if he holds his job then the board must have confidence in him, on team choice is think fans always tend to disagree, personally I think Beattie I an albatross around the team neck

mab · 17-02-2013, 09:17

Ok so were do stanley get the money from to pay off Leam's remaining 2yr contract and then pay the wages of a new manager!! jc wont come cheap nor will anyone else for that matter.

accybeme · 17-02-2013, 09:25

Quote:

Originally Posted by mab

Ok so were do stanley get the money from to pay off Leam's remaining 2yr contract and then pay the wages of a new manager!! jc wont come cheap nor will anyone else for that matter.

well said mab! it's the board decision to make anyway

jaysay · 17-02-2013, 09:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007

Its not negative, I am being realistic.
We are sleep walking into relegation under the excuse of 'loyalty' to a manager who is not delivering.
Liam has bee a good servant to the club, but the FACTS show his reign as manager to be a disaster.

This is not about being anti Leam, no Stanley fan could be anti Leam, he is a nice bloke who has worked hard for the club.
But we are in a race to the bottom, and the only thing we are able to change to see an improvement is the manager.

Coleman and Bell would keep us up, but the longer we leave it, the games are ticking away, the points are not being collected and our rivals are making gains.

You may not like the FACTS, but they speak a lot louder than any words on a forum.

Um another guy with a crystal ball, A, I doubt very much that Coleman and Bell would return, and if they did why are you so sure they would keep Stanley up, maybe if people like you got off Richardsons back everybody would be singing off the same hymn sheet.