|
Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
|
09-04-2011, 08:50
|
#181
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pie eating country again
Posts: 4,659
Liked: 442 times
Rep Power: 63678
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by smudgie
Now what to do this afternoon????
|
Support every home team in League two that is playing a play off or near play off rival or even the clubs in the auto promotion slots
__________________
Piston broke owd geezer, Stanley supporter and shareholder, Retired and loving it Addendum, the views I express on here are my own, if you don't like them: TOUGH!
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 08:57
|
#182
|
Junior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 16
Liked: 0 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Frustrating result last night - a couple of mins away from victory. I'm still confident we can catch third place
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 08:59
|
#183
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Great to see Kipax's pics on the fishy, welcome back.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 09:14
|
#184
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,307
Liked: 498 times
Rep Power: 6448
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
I agree Cashman, Tony's pics are superb.
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 09:49
|
#185
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Nationwide
Posts: 1,197
Liked: 0 times
Rep Power: 163
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Let down by the lack of subs. I feel our midfield was tired in 80+. The sending off made us play the long ball more trying to make use of an extra man. But really when we was playing the ball along the floor we was looking dangerous. Ah well win at home and draw away and we will be thereabouts come end of the season.
If we win at Shrews then auto is possible I feel if results go our way.
We need to beat Burton away no matter what IMHO.
Last edited by Nickelson; 09-04-2011 at 09:52.
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 09:55
|
#186
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickelson
Let down by the lack of subs.
|
those 6 words say it all.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 10:28
|
#187
|
God Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 6,522
Liked: 367 times
Rep Power: 3484
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Subs wouldn't have made a jot of a difference as tactically, we were clueless.
Full respect and credit to Macclesfield for doing their homework on us and stopping us play our game because once they did that (which didn't take long) it became evident that we had absolutely no plan B. We were forced to launch the ball forward unsuccessfully due to their excellent closing down. There was no movement amongst our forward players in order to receive the ball; our 'back six' as I call them (defence & holding mid) had nothing to pass to. How often did we see Joycey win the ball well, then have nothing in front of him?
Sure, the liner was a joke. McConville's goal looked well onside and their equaliser looked exactly the opposite. However on the balance of play we did not deserve to win that game one bit. But it is still a kick in the teeth to only get a point in that fashion.
The one positive for me was Proccy's goal... what a brilliant strike. After that it looked like we just might have been able to step up our game and edge it. Sadly the lack of concentration allowed Macclesfield to get that cross into the box ...and the liner did the rest.
Just glad we have two home games to allow our players to remember how to play football!
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 10:33
|
#188
|
Full Member+
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 817
Liked: 210 times
Rep Power: 6827
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
I know this is the best chance ever for playoffs, but at the end of the day a few weeks ago we thought we were going into admin ,Eric Whalley was dragging his feet , all this has now gone. Let us be grateful for what we have got. We are safe , we will be here next season whether it be league one or two. I do hope the lads can keep it up and do get the promotion they well deserve , but I will settle for what we have got.
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 10:39
|
#189
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,307
Liked: 498 times
Rep Power: 6448
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Id have to agree.
Im just thankful we still have a bloody football league club, never mind a team that is challenging for promotion.
The short-sightness of some people is absolutely staggering.
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 10:43
|
#190
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker
Subs wouldn't have made a jot of a difference as tactically, we were clueless.
Full respect and credit to Macclesfield for doing their homework on us and stopping us play our game because once they did that (which didn't take long) it became evident that we had absolutely no plan B. We were forced to launch the ball forward unsuccessfully due to their excellent closing down. There was no movement amongst our forward players in order to receive the ball; our 'back six' as I call them (defence & holding mid) had nothing to pass to. How often did we see Joycey win the ball well, then have nothing in front of him?
Sure, the liner was a joke. McConville's goal looked well onside and their equaliser looked exactly the opposite. However on the balance of play we did not deserve to win that game one bit. But it is still a kick in the teeth to only get a point in that fashion.
The one positive for me was Proccy's goal... what a brilliant strike. After that it looked like we just might have been able to step up our game and edge it. Sadly the lack of concentration allowed Macclesfield to get that cross into the box ...and the liner did the rest.
Just glad we have two home games to allow our players to remember how to play football!
|
Disagree shaker, subs could have made a difference, yes tactically clueless in first half, just punting ball in air in the main,1-0 down,was worth replacing a couple with instructions to play on ground. Jimmy Ryan who i love to bits was terrible last night, maybe tiredness or just a bad day in the office, if yer losing n looking bad, then fresh faces can't do any worse simples. by the way coley said apart from 25 mins we were the best side, is he on acid?
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 11:22
|
#191
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 10,549
Liked: 2654 times
Rep Power: 3024041
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by cashman
Disagree shaker, subs could have made a difference, yes tactically clueless in first half, just punting ball in air in the main,1-0 down,was worth replacing a couple with instructions to play on ground. Jimmy Ryan who i love to bits was terrible last night, maybe tiredness or just a bad day in the office, if yer losing n looking bad, then fresh faces can't do any worse simples. by the way coley said apart from 25 mins we were the best side, is he on acid?
|
I am with you on this one Cashy, when we got in front and they went down to 10, Razor would have terrorised them and Jimmy has not played well for weeks!!!!!
It is all about opinion
__________________
JCFG
19 Years in the Football League
308
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 11:30
|
#192
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,307
Liked: 498 times
Rep Power: 6448
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Jimmy not played well for weeks?!?!!!?
Sorry mate, you must be on a different planet to every other stanley fan.
I agree he was poor last night, but he has been magnificent !!
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 11:33
|
#193
|
God Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 6,522
Liked: 367 times
Rep Power: 3484
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Jimmy had a bad spell after he picked up a knock but for the five games prior to last night he has been magnificent.
With regards to subs, I don't think any attacking subs by us would've made a difference as Macclesfield were defending so well from front to back. Like for like subs (eg Razor for Ryan) wouldn't have had any effect in my opinion.
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 11:34
|
#194
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,307
Liked: 498 times
Rep Power: 6448
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Sod it, ill wade in to the argument"
John Miles is the greatest player to ever pull on a stanley shirt
|
|
|
09-04-2011, 11:48
|
#195
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: Macclesfield Thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by shakermaker
With regards to subs, I don't think any attacking subs by us would've made a difference as Macclesfield were defending so well from front to back. Like for like subs (eg Razor for Ryan) wouldn't have had any effect in my opinion.
|
In my opinion thats nonsense, "Long John Silver" could have improved things Jimmy was that poor last night.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
Other sites of interest.. |
More town sites.. |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 20:07.
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com
|
|