Marsden Stands Down - Page 4

Bagpuss · 05-10-2009, 13:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey

Interesting to hear that O'Neil wasn't at the meeting, but yet the decision was made in his absence.

Eric Whalley was though.

JEFF · 05-10-2009, 13:59

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss

Eric Whalley was though.

Don't think so.

simon · 05-10-2009, 14:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss

Eric Whalley was though.

Hope that is just a joke....

Posted via Mobile Device

Bagpuss · 05-10-2009, 15:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by simon

Hope that is just a joke....

Of course it was.

Doug · 05-10-2009, 15:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bagpuss

Of course it was.

Behave you sod.....

lancsdave · 05-10-2009, 18:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tin Monkey

Interesting to hear that O'Neil wasn't at the meeting, but yet the decision was made in his absence.

What decision ? If the majority shareholder isn't there, the rest of the board don't have any decision to make do they ?

Redraine · 05-10-2009, 18:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave

What decision ? If the majority shareholder isn't there, the rest of the board don't have any decision to make do they ?

You don't expect that lot to understand procedure, do you?

maccawozzagod · 06-10-2009, 00:38

board meeting = one member one vote

should a belligerent majority shareholder be outvoted at a directors meeting (assuming he is a director/chairman/secretary) then he can call for a shareholders meeting to overrule being overruled. And as a 50% or over shareholder can't be outvoted at that meeting ......