Official club statement - Page 2

cashman · 01-09-2010, 09:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

Maybe so, but I don't think that it was part of the deal that he is allowed to travel on the team coach and sit in the Directors' box at away games. He was at Tranmere last night. The opposition probably think he is still a Director when in fact he is only a shareholder. Are all shareholders allowed to travel on the team coach and sit in the away Directors' box ? I don't think so, so why should he ?

Is it any wonder there is mistrust amongst folk of these people? this statement will NOT be released until there is no choice.IMHO.

yerself · 01-09-2010, 10:30

Aren't we still waiting for a statement regarding the internal investigation into the Scouse betting ring?

Exile on Spencer St · 01-09-2010, 11:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

Are all shareholders allowed to travel on the team coach and sit in the away Directors' box ? I don't think so, so why should he ?

I must be his charm.

BedsRed · 01-09-2010, 16:30

To be fair to the cardboard millionaire, he probably isn't acting a if he owns the place, as far as he's concerned, he probably still does.

Which is why, I'm afraid, despite Ilyas' fine words and good intentions, the issue of EW's shareholding is crucial. As long as he's still involved in any way, the club won't be able to get the community and business support that is crucial for te grand plan to come to fruition.

Thanks for the good times, Eric, but you've long since outstayed your welcome.

Bagpuss · 01-09-2010, 16:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by BedsRed

Which is why, I'm afraid, despite Ilyas' fine words and good intentions, the issue of EW's shareholding is crucial. As long as he's still involved in any way, the club won't be able to get the community and business support that is crucial for te grand plan to come to fruition.

You've got it in one, simple Whalley = No future.

Exile on Spencer St · 02-09-2010, 11:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by BedsRed

...As long as he's still involved in any way, the club won't be able to get the community and business support that is crucial ...Thanks for the good times, Eric, but you've long since outstayed your welcome.

Amen to that, Beds.
Stanley's only chance of business support is from a barge pole manufacturer so long as the cardboard millionaire remains.

JEFF · 02-09-2010, 14:44

I don't know how he has the cheek to show his face at Stanley, after all, he was the one sitting around waiting for the winding up order and doing nothing, and now, when Stanley appear to be on a sound footing he wants a piece of the action again. He is the one who should have a BANNING ORDER against him and not the SU2.

cashman · 02-09-2010, 14:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

I don't know how he has the cheek to show his face at Stanley, after all, he was the one sitting around waiting for the winding up order and doing nothing, and now, when Stanley appear to be on a sound footing he wants a piece of the action again. He is the one who should have a BANNING ORDER against him and not the SU2.

Yeh aint alone in those sentiments Jeff.

Exile on Spencer St · 02-09-2010, 16:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF

I don't know how he has the cheek to show his face at Stanley, after all, he was the one sitting around waiting for the winding up order and doing nothing... .

It's probably because he doesn't have the cheek to show his face in Chester that we remain blessed with his presence.

Tealeaf · 02-09-2010, 16:57

Maybe we should get Lord Saville to make the statement. Afterall, it only took him 12 years to produce the bloody sunday report, which is a hell of a lot quicker than 'owt we can expect from the current regime.

BedsRed · 02-09-2010, 17:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by Exile on Spencer St

It's probably because he doesn't have the cheek to show his face in Chester that we remain blessed with his presence.

I'd almost forgotten that. Damn near killed two clubs last season and still I suspect he'd pass a fit and proper person test. Perhaps it's a care in the community thing were doing - save him doing the hat-trick (although part of me would love MK Dons to be the third club to benefit from his "talents").

Jeg Red · 02-09-2010, 17:25

The so called new broom that swept in nearly two weeks ago have missed a great opportunity to start as they mean to go on. You only get one chance to make a first impression and Rob and co. in my view have lost it with the way this has been handled this.

I'm afraid there's no wind of change blowing around the people it really needs to

maccawozzagod · 02-09-2010, 18:09

the wind of changed hasn't been allowed to happen though has it? or has it?

cashman · 02-09-2010, 18:50

Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod

the wind of changed hasn't been allowed to happen though has it? or has it?

Well if it has, its better n owt David Nixon ever produced.

harwood red · 03-09-2010, 12:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by HarwoodRed

The so called new broom that swept in nearly two weeks ago have missed a great opportunity to start as they mean to go on. You only get one chance to make a first impression and Rob and co. in my view have lost it with the way this has been handled this.

I'm afraid there's no wind of change blowing around the people it really needs to

omg who is this???

Do I have a clone?