Official club statement - Page 6

cashman · 16-09-2010, 22:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by yonmon

And don't you think that this exhortation from the 'Fishy' proclamation was a tad patronising, if not a device to deflect everyone from equally important factors in the life of Accrington Stanley ?.

"The club asks all of our supporters to remain focussed on events on the field and continue to give the fabulous support to John Coleman and his team on what is our best start to date to a new season."

As if we wouldn't !!!..

very patronising imho, support fer the lads is compulsory, its the ******* that get none.

bdc · 16-09-2010, 23:24

I think that this battle for the club will end up depending on what written agreements exist for the repayment of debts to Ilyas and how this relates to conversion of this into equity. My main concern would be as to whether the increased shareholding would technically need the agreement of EW to issue new shares.

On another note the club is not self-sufficient and will not be for a number of years, so for DON to suggest otherwise smacks of arrogance and lack of business knowledge. Whilst it is admiral of Ilyas to want to include EW and DON in future agreements I think it is slightly naive to think that this would be workable alongside a fans ownership scheme. I think that the ownership issue is a monkey that we have needed off the back for sometime so if this ends up clearing up the mess then so be it. I just hope that it doesn't drag on and effect the players or manager. I think that if it is to become a fans owned club then action needs to be taken swiftly to prevent off the field actions becoming distractions.

maccawozzagod · 16-09-2010, 23:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdc

I think that this battle for the club will end up depending on what written agreements exist for the repayment of debts to Ilyas and how this relates to conversion of this into equity. My main concern would be as to whether the increased shareholding would technically need the agreement of EW to issue new shares.

I would imagine that the technicality there would be whether EW actually was the majority shareholder and that O'Neil hadn't acted in good faith when HE AGREED to the equity thingie. But if it could be proved that sufficient notice had been given for ALL shareholders to attend the meeting then it wouldn't matter a pop whether he was there or not. If any credence given to Cashy's claim that he was on the premises at the time then T.S.B

but to be honest it's not worth debating from our point of view, because what will be will be and the ball is rolling.

bdc · 16-09-2010, 23:40

Macca: Would you know what the accounts show as money that it is owing to Ilyas?

maccawozzagod · 17-09-2010, 06:09

ain't got a clue sorry. Probably about 50p

VALAIRIAN · 17-09-2010, 14:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdc

Macca: Would you know what the accounts show as money that it is owing to Ilyas?

On Tuesday night, Ilyas did say to somebody - in a replyish to a question - that if they were to think of a number, double it, then they might be somewhere near the amount, but it did not matter, as he would never be asking for the money back!!!!

yonmon · 19-09-2010, 09:58

Whilst researching some Limericks, I came across the following....

"A smiling young Man from Niger,
Once went for a ride on a tiger.
They returned from the ride,
With the young Man inside,
And a smile on the face of the tiger.".

Further research revealed the Traditional story upon which this Limerick is based, a paragraph of which reads ........

"......and each day as the Tiger slept in the heat of the noonday sun, two stupid boys from the nearby village would
creep up on him and tweak his tail until he stirred in his slumbers, then they would run away laughing at their daring exploits. But one day, as they were pulling on his tail, the Tiger became wide awake and, with one snap of his mighty jaws, he swallowed them both alive !...later as he chewed on the remnants of their bodies....there was a smile on the face of the Tiger !...

Which started me a-thinking !!.

cashman · 19-09-2010, 10:09

think that find may be very appropriate, certainly hope so.

DAV007 · 19-09-2010, 10:13

Agree with BDC

Iylas needs to get rid of Oneill and Whalley once and for all from the club, in any capacity.

With them hanging around we will never move on.

simon · 19-09-2010, 12:30

“Why go away from something that is working and do something that has failed at other clubs?
“If it is right for the club, I will consider stepping down. But I need to see it in black and white.”

Can you believe this has come out of the mouth of a man that went to court with nothing to save ASFC........ About a man that turned up to save ASFC ??

BE GONE YOU FOOL...

Tealeaf · 30-09-2010, 16:24

It is now over two weeks that a statement was placed on the club website that it was their intention to call an AGM in October. Given that under company law, 21 days notification has to be made prior to that AGM and given that many signed up to the share package a year ago, has anyone yet received formal word of an AGM?

VALAIRIAN · 30-09-2010, 16:31

Tealeaf · 30-09-2010, 16:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN

No.

OK...here's something else to ponder over:

Companies Act 2006

How many of you think O'Neil is fulfilling this part of his directors duties?

especially 172(1)d

shillelagh · 30-09-2010, 17:28

its £82 million on the euromillions tomorrow nite ..

Home | The National Lottery - home of Lotto, EuroMillions and Instant Wins

SPUGGIE J · 30-09-2010, 17:57

Quote:

Originally Posted by shillelagh

its £82 million on the euromillions tomorrow nite ..

Home | The National Lottery - home of Lotto, EuroMillions and Instant Wins

So if any one wins enough they buy the club and put all info that has avoided the shreader to the fans then I take it.

There is something going on and you can bet your last breath it aint good. I dont think it is a case of no news is good news here.