|
Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
|
103Likes
19-05-2016, 19:01
|
#76
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pompey
Posts: 3,218
Liked: 1343 times
Rep Power: 107482
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
I've not seen a centre-forward blown up that much since Paul Mullin left us, but I have to say I like the thought of having the Beast laying the ball off to Billy Kee once the Wombles release him 'cos he can't stay the pace in League 1 ....
Could be our next folk hero!!
Only joking - maybe!!
__________________
Zero Tolerance of Intolerance
|
|
|
19-05-2016, 19:05
|
#77
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
Hey he aint no mug thats fer sure the humungous get.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
19-05-2016, 19:11
|
#78
|
Full Member
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
I personally blame McConville for last night!!!
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 03:15
|
#79
|
Resting in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Clayton-le-Moors
Posts: 3,271
Liked: 713 times
Rep Power: 14169
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
What's happened to te Guess the gate thread? I thought I heard Tha gate announced as 4600 but have only seen 3600 published anywhere
What was it, Mab?
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 07:27
|
#80
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,281
Liked: 995 times
Rep Power: 11935
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redraine
What's happened to te Guess the gate thread? I thought I heard Tha gate announced as 4600 but have only seen 3600 published anywhere
What was it, Mab?
|
Accrington Stanley @ASFCofficial May 18
Attendance 3567 with 1067 from Wimbledon - thank you one and all!
I didn't hear the announcement but from what I gather they added the away fans to the total instead of including them in the total
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 08:05
|
#81
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
Liked: 16 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimer
I've not seen a centre-forward blown up that much since Paul Mullin left us, but I have to say I like the thought of having the Beast laying the ball off to Billy Kee once the Wombles release him 'cos he can't stay the pace in League 1 ....
Could be our next folk hero!!
Only joking - maybe!!
|
Claytons pies would be happy with that signing
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 08:44
|
#82
|
God Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Accrington
Posts: 9,663
Liked: 4007 times
Rep Power: 596136
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lancsdave
Accrington Stanley @ASFCofficial May 18
Attendance 3567 with 1067 from Wimbledon - thank you one and all!
I didn't hear the announcement but from what I gather they added the away fans to the total instead of including them in the total
|
Can understand the confusion - must've been difficult working in the dark . . . . . . . . too soon, ok I'll get my coat
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 18:11
|
#83
|
God Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Red and White Fortnight
Posts: 9,110
Liked: 1555 times
Rep Power: 12675
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
Thats a crap crowd, how on earth was it a sell out?
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 18:40
|
#84
|
Full Member+
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 538
Liked: 107 times
Rep Power: 8844
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
if thats the case the crown ground does not hold 5000 then, i had a struggle to get back from the loo, to my spot on the clayton end.
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 18:40
|
#85
|
Resting in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Clayton-le-Moors
Posts: 3,271
Liked: 713 times
Rep Power: 14169
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
It looked close to a sell out from where I was sitting. Where is Mab when you want him? Someone must have guessed near the true figure!
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 18:45
|
#86
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,281
Liked: 995 times
Rep Power: 11935
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
Wimbledons allocation was 1700 so thats 700 off capacity to start with
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 22:37
|
#87
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,877
Liked: 808 times
Rep Power: 6047
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
I thought Charles for Wimbledon was immense, he won everything.
He is way to good for league 2, Wimbledon did well getting him in on loan.
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 22:40
|
#88
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pie eating country again
Posts: 4,659
Liked: 442 times
Rep Power: 63677
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
If Wimbledon wanted 1700, why is it that FL rules state they could have up to 2,000 or 10% of capacity, which means they should have had no more than 510 at most, 507 if pedantic. If that is the case, why were Dons fans sitting in the Jack Barrett stand? I thought there was segregation in the Football League? Should have been turfed out and put with their own fans
__________________
Piston broke owd geezer, Stanley supporter and shareholder, Retired and loving it Addendum, the views I express on here are my own, if you don't like them: TOUGH!
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 22:44
|
#89
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Accy
Posts: 1,084
Liked: 175 times
Rep Power: 5370
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy
If Wimbledon wanted 1700, why is it that FL rules state they could have up to 2,000 or 10% of capacity, which means they should have had no more than 510 at most, 507 if pedantic. If that is the case, why were Dons fans sitting in the Jack Barrett stand? I thought there was segregation in the Football League? Should have been turfed out and put with their own fans
|
They must have been before and knew what it was like sitting in the cow shed!
|
|
|
20-05-2016, 22:51
|
#90
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,877
Liked: 808 times
Rep Power: 6047
|
Re: PLAY OFF LEG 2 Home v Wimbledon (0-1 First leg)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy
If Wimbledon wanted 1700, why is it that FL rules state they could have up to 2,000 or 10% of capacity, which means they should have had no more than 510 at most, 507 if pedantic. If that is the case, why were Dons fans sitting in the Jack Barrett stand? I thought there was segregation in the Football League? Should have been turfed out and put with their own fans
|
dont think it really matters, it was more income for the club and didnt effect the result.
i feel privileged to have witnessed such a great season, so close but we can do it all again next season.
|
|
|
Other sites of interest.. |
More town sites.. |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:05.
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com
|
|