Rob Heys

[loweiy]

well said

[AccyAggro]

Well said, makes you look at it all in a different way and how much more wrong DON was makin him follow all his instructions and telling him what to say like a little puppet

[katei77]

[B]that Rob has tried all he can to mortgage his house. He also contributed thousands to the HMRC payment -
how many people would risk their home for their place of work?how many would risk going back to the better half and saying sorry love we might lose the home oh and i ve no job now,he could of very well risked his family and still could if the club does not do as well money wise in the coming months/years

again in stark and amazing contrast to ALL OTHER DIRECTORS.[/B]ASFC are not a rich club as well we know!this is not a time to single out directors for how much/little they gave many will not have £1000"s sat in the bank or the means to raise £1000"s,also remember along with fans many directors have given alot of time,day to day help and money over the years to ASFC

Even if you believe that Rob is guilty of acts and statements that are horrible
everyone makes mistakes,ok rob has messed up bigtime!but when you are told something enough times you do begin to believe it,especially when a offer is refused by a gentleman like Ilyas to rid of club of its debts,you would believe DON has the funds do it himself

He is a true fan, "stanley till i die" is branded on his heart.
i dont think anyone can say this untrue i also believe this is ture of most of the boardroom,note i said MOST

a little knowledge is a very dangerous thing
we really havent got a clue whats gone on and most likely wont have for along to come,the saying jury still out springs to mind untill we have all the full facts of the last 8weeks

[Doug]

Originally Posted by cashman

n by the way i'm yer friend n i think yer n ugly git, to be perfectly candid.

I may be but I'm proud to be Stanley and proud to be able to look over both walls ......anyway, Kisser said I was a good looking bloke......

N.B.

Bookends.......

[DAV007]

Arent we missing the point. He has failed as a chief exec for years. He has told lies, just before court he told Iylas we had no other debt. Fan or not, he has no future as a chief exec. Get rid/new start/more capable person required.

[Grimps]

im not the best in spelling so here we go . three things thats all im going to say. 1 lets just put all bend us . 2 turn in one gruop all fans and get bend jc and jb they are work very hard at keeping us in the league and cups . 3 if we can do that with no more crap going on we could make the play off s . pus its my brith day and we still have a club counld not live with no stanley up the reds

[DevonStanley]

I've read (on here and elsewhere) that Ilyas Khan was prepared to bail out the club with no preconditions. While that's very worthy and no doubt many supporters would be grateful, it strikes me as barking.

Unless Mr Khan takes a shareholding for his cash injection - which he could in time pass on to the nascent supporters trust - there would seem to be little point as the club will, most likely, slip into the same debt problems again within not too long a period.

However, I don't think Mr Khan is barking, so no doubt there'll be discussions between Mr Khan and the current board as to what happens between now and next Wednesday. My only hope is that there are some more director resignations, Rob Heys is given a job he's possibly more suited to, and Mr Khan can assert some influence on deciding who will take the club forward.

[Mr Matthew]

Thouroughly nice bloke, but lacking ability, we need and deserve better in that role. Keep him at the club but make him someone's assistant, train him to become an asset.

[Kiwi John]

Totally agree with you Mr Khan.

[flashy]

Originally Posted by DevonStanley

Rob Heys is given a job he's possibly more suited to

Ball Boy?

[Redraine]

He is STILL in denial. Dany asks him in today's Observer if the club would have been wound up without Ilyas and Peter's intervention and he replies, for the public record, - "It's impossible to say"! Also some guff about the club having made a profit in the last quarter.
What planet is he on?

[VALAIRIAN]

My opinion - for what it is worth, RH I believe is a good chap, if there are wholesale changes at Stanley, it cannot be a good thing. Team, Coley & Co. Apart, review all staff/positions, but not just an enmass change. Let's give some/all people the chance to prove us wrong.

P.S. Big post IK

[katei77]

I for one do not think any of us can question Rob Heys love and passion for the club,he is a fan first and foremost,and for this reason i think he should be given time to redeem himself,but i think he along with everyone else would agreed not as CE.

But what next?

We as fans have our own opinions,and should do,how boring would it be if we all agreeded?

As much as its the fans club it is a business.

But are we fans business qualified to say who should be the next CE?

Do we not now need someone who is not a fan,someone who will not allow their passion for club to cloud their business judgement?

Someone who will make business like decisions for the good of the business,who will not be afraid to make ruthless business decisions,who will not be afraid to turn down ideas for the good of the business,who will take fully calculated business risks(there is risks in business big or small,it can not be avoided)who will work within the business buget,who will deliver bad news to fans but have full reasons for why they are taking such actions,you again can not avoid bad news in business.

We as fans have thrown good money after bad,i dread to think of the times i ve delayed paying bills etc so i could make the next game,only last weekend we cancelled a week away to make the walk and game,we do not what a CE who will make decisions like this,oh sod it i wont pay that bill ill use the money for something else,not a way to run a successful business.

Yes who ever takes on this role should listen to us fans but they should not do something just to please us,they should only do things for the good of the business,if a player has to be sold for the good of business so be it,no matter how much we wish to keep a player they are asset to business and should be viewed as such.They should be able to explain why spending is happening in this dept of business and not others,why cut backs are be made,why they may have reduce out goings,even if it means job loses.This may not sit very well with some fans but it is how the business world works,In comings high out goings low!

I for one will want to able view the next CE profile in the business world before placing my faith in them,but faith we will have place in whoever takes on the CE post because like it or not they will be in charge of club and business.

[cashman]

Originally Posted by VALAIRIAN

My opinion - for what it is worth, RH I believe is a good chap, if there are wholesale changes at Stanley, it cannot be a good thing. Team, Coley & Co. Apart, review all staff/positions, but not just an enmass change. Let's give some/all people the chance to prove us wrong.

P.S. Big post IK

Originally Posted by Redraine

He is STILL in denial. Dany asks him in today's Observer if the club would have been wound up without Ilyas and Peter's intervention and he replies, for the public record, - "It's impossible to say"! Also some guff about the club having made a profit in the last quarter.
What planet is he on?

why do ya think it cannot be a good thing Val? MR Heys seemingly would not recognise the truth if it slapped him in the kisser, he aint even got the balls to hold his hands up to Mr Khan n Mr Marsden, whilst he may be a good chap n stanley through n through he has NOT the ability to be a CEO. IMHO.

[lancsdave]

You can recruit the best people in the world, unless they are allowed to do the job they are paid for then it's a waste of time.