|
Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
|
13-09-2011, 15:31
|
#16
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,307
Liked: 498 times
Rep Power: 6448
|
Re: Rotherham thread
On the bench, impact sub for me.
|
|
|
13-09-2011, 16:08
|
#17
|
Resting in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Clayton-le-Moors
Posts: 3,271
Liked: 713 times
Rep Power: 14169
|
Re: Rotherham thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by maccawozzagod
We don't have a good enough team to carry passengers. Our results are usually borne out sheer hard work and persistence and we can I'll afford to carry passengers. If he ain't fit then pack him off to fat club until he is fit. Having said that he'd walk (rather than run?) back into my team when he is fully fit.
|
Well said Macca. As I have mentioned before, I don't think he has ever shown us the true Craney since his comeback game away at Bury, I think , his 2nd comeback, when he was on fire. I wish it were otherwise, but I seriously doubt that he is capable of reaching that level ever again.
|
|
|
13-09-2011, 16:33
|
#18
|
Resting in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Clayton-le-Moors
Posts: 3,271
Liked: 713 times
Rep Power: 14169
|
Re: Rotherham thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by football19
I would go one step further,and say hes better than Cisak.
Both commanding keepers with a good kicking game,but Murdoch is a better shot stopper
|
Agreed. I think he looks like being our best keeper since Elliot, including Kenny Arthur. I don't think any keeper in the world would have saved Gillingham's penalty.
|
|
|
13-09-2011, 18:19
|
#19
|
God Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 7,051
Liked: 909 times
Rep Power: 1125978
|
Re: Rotherham thread
Morning boys and girls...its raining off and on here but not enough to keep me off work and be able to follow the mighty STANLEY dam it.
|
|
|
13-09-2011, 19:50
|
#20
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pompey
Posts: 3,242
Liked: 1348 times
Rep Power: 107483
|
Re: Rotherham thread
Hi Kiwi, you're not alome ...
__________________
Zero Tolerance of Intolerance
|
|
|
13-09-2011, 21:05
|
#21
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,705
Liked: 83 times
Rep Power: 2397
|
Re: Rotherham thread
The Rotherham manager was on Radio Sheffield previewing the match.
He gave a marvellous warm glowing tribute to John Coleman, his players and the club and its supporters and a very astute analysis as to what makes Stanley special.
I heard it in the build up after 7 but if you get the chance to hear it in an iplayer "listen again" of their main footie programme between 6 and 7 its well worth a listen.
__________________
6th March 1962 - They turned off the gas but nothing could extinguish the flame!
|
|
|
13-09-2011, 21:27
|
#22
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: Rotherham thread
well my thoughts- watched a good game wi 2 good sides tonight, n Rotherham should be there at the death this season, no complaints about result, though stanley could have nicked it at the death wi Craney clear in box screaming fer a ball that never came, only grumble- cowshed liner had the vision of "Stevie Wonder" missed far to many things, balls outa play, handball in box which was right in front of him,complete useless cretin. Stanley will climb this league i have no doubt, also not a dirty tackle in the game, well done both sides.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
13-09-2011, 21:49
|
#23
|
God Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 6,522
Liked: 367 times
Rep Power: 3485
|
Re: Rotherham thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by smudgie
Bavs is the number 2, simple.
You dont pick someone out of sympathy.
Bavs will play in the JPT to keep his sharpness, if he has a blinder and Murdoch a stinker then Coley will consider it ive no doubt.
But for now Murdoch is unquestionably the number 1!
|
Who said anything about sympathy? In my opinion Bavs deserves a start. I'm not convinced that Murdoch is any better than Dunbavin, let alone better than Cisak as some on here feel. I don't think there's a clear number one/number two situation like you do. But that's cool, it's all about opinions. I don't try to push my opinions forward as facts.
Strange game tonight. Thought we were outplayed by a better team for the vast majority of the match, but we seemed to be the ones making the better & clearer chances. Very odd. The draw was a fair result in the end.
Onto individuals, McIntyre is ok going forward but a liability at the back. Would much prefer Deano on the left and Murph at right back; I'm not convinced by his efforts in midfield though he did work very hard. For me, we need Craney back in that team asap as we don't have a creative force in the attacking four players. Credit to Podge & Wes for conjuring chances out of scraps but we'd be much more lethal with healthy service for them. Deano & Joycey reliable as ever, Fletcher a class above.
|
|
|
13-09-2011, 22:21
|
#24
|
Junior Member+
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 29
Liked: 1 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Rotherham thread
Like the little I've seen of Murdock, but keeping is all about consistency and he hasn't achieved that yet. The potential is there but he has some way to go to get to Kenny Arthur's level for us yet. Fingers crossed but lets not get too carried away, a few saves for the cameras are sod all use if he makes a significant mistake every game. Not getting on his back, think he's a great signing, but plenty of work yet needed and to compare him to KA is a little premature
|
|
|
13-09-2011, 22:45
|
#25
|
Coffin Dodger.
|
Re: Rotherham thread
Put it this way regarding keepers, "Keep The Faith" n Meself were in the Shrewsbury supporters bar outside their ground last season, we were nattering to a bunch of em, they said "Ask Coley to play Dunbavin please, i will let shaker guess the reason they gave us. surely most folk can't be wrong? though i agree wi shaker regarding Mcintyre defending.
__________________
N.L.T.B.G.Y.D. Do not argue with an idiot, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
|
|
|
14-09-2011, 07:14
|
#26
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,307
Liked: 498 times
Rep Power: 6448
|
Re: Rotherham thread
I rest my case cashman!
|
|
|
14-09-2011, 07:17
|
#27
|
God Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Red and White Fortnight
Posts: 9,110
Liked: 1555 times
Rep Power: 12676
|
Re: Rotherham thread
I'll take others opinions on his shot stopping but on the two occasions I've seen him so far I've thought his distribution to be poor. Last night he twice gave to a nearby defender who was immediately under pressure, hospital balls?
Decent command of his area though.
|
|
|
14-09-2011, 08:07
|
#28
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manchester
Posts: 4,307
Liked: 498 times
Rep Power: 6448
|
Re: Rotherham thread
As for the game itself, I was pleased with a point.
Rotherham are a very good side and will be in the top 3 come the end of the season.
Thought there number 23 up front looked class, mcintyre had a nightmare against him all game. I do believe that is our weak link at the moment unfortunately.
If only coid and leam could be relied on week in week out!
Special mention for buzzer and the pitch, which again was magnificent considering the weather.
Roll on Saturday.
|
|
|
14-09-2011, 08:10
|
#29
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,281
Liked: 995 times
Rep Power: 11936
|
Re: Rotherham thread
I agree on the main with Shaker, Rotherham were probably the better side for a large part of the game yet the better chances fell to Stanley. Based on last nights match Rotherham will be up there, which should also suggest Stanley won't be a million miles away.
|
|
|
14-09-2011, 09:40
|
#30
|
Resting in Peace
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Clayton-le-Moors
Posts: 3,271
Liked: 713 times
Rep Power: 14169
|
Re: Rotherham thread
Agree with Shaker and Smudgie. What nobody has mentioned is what a big, physical side Rotherham are. Every one of their players must have been over 6 feet tall, some well over, and with pace to burn. At half time I would have been happy with a point, but at the final whistle I thought we almost deserved to nick it. What we lack in inches the lads more than made up for in heart and aggression, Coley having worked his half time magic yet again. A smashing performance by the lads and a great game to watch. Gutted to miss this Saturday's game, but it's no.1 son's 40th. birthday celebration up on Tyneside.
|
|
|
Other sites of interest.. |
More town sites.. |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:03.
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com
|
|