Seasonal Emergency! - Page 2

DaveinGermany · 24-12-2012, 12:40

Since the options are severely limited, just have to hope the lad can do the best he can & that the back four buck up to ease the pressure on him.
Regardless of what happens it'll be valuable experience & a major step in his learning curve.

maccawozzagod · 24-12-2012, 16:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

No ones disputing that, but is the fact we must have a keeper on the bench too difficult to grasp?

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

No rule common sense.

fact implies rule

Cashy calling someone thick implies everyone knows this rule

so was just checking

there's a good number of teams don't bother on occasions to list a spare goalkeeper, preferring to increase their outfield options instead, as the likelihood of needing that spare keeper is rare.

cashman · 24-12-2012, 17:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod

fact implies rule

Cashy calling someone thick implies everyone knows this rule

so was just checking

there's a good number of teams don't bother on occasions to list a spare goalkeeper, preferring to increase their outfield options instead, as the likelihood of needing that spare keeper is rare.

May be rare, but on 2 occasions so far this season warranted, its sods law macca yeh will need one.

maccawozzagod · 24-12-2012, 22:35

i kinda agree, and its definitely sods law that we'll need one in the next 3 games if we cant acquire another

Redraine · 27-12-2012, 16:06

Stanley's appeal refused. Are the panel blind?? They have condoned outrageous cheating. I am disgusted.

cashman · 27-12-2012, 16:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redraine

Stanley's appeal refused. Are the panel blind?? They have condoned outrageous cheating. I am disgusted.

Not a great shock, wrong but expected.

maccawozzagod · 28-12-2012, 09:40

he put his head into the numpties head, its intent.

shadsworthcloud · 28-12-2012, 10:13

he could have been killed!!!

lancsdave · 28-12-2012, 10:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by shadsworthcloud

he could have been killed!!!

Not from being head butted you can't, only if the ball hits you on the head

Exile on Spencer St · 28-12-2012, 10:40

I don't know about killed, but Chadwick could have got a part in Reservoir Dogs.
Did not his reaction have 'intent'? Intent to cheat.

maccawozzagod · 28-12-2012, 11:02

there was no way the appeal would have overturned the ban. What it should do though is force the FA to look at the video and decide whether Chadwick should be allowed to carry on playing football. Surely he is a health and safety risk if he can be hurt so easily? God forbid if he ever has to head a ball at pace!