so posts about the truth are now being removed on here???? - Page 2

maccawozzagod · 03-11-2009, 00:14

DAV007 there are numerous examples of people suing messageboards or posters for inflammatory content. It has to be removed if it accuses someone of something. If it was your board then its up to you whether you run the risk or not, SM is only acting under the wishes of the board owner. We save the rumour mongering for PMS and in the pub

Stanleymad · 03-11-2009, 00:24

Thanks macca, im upset also so please have some respect im only doing my job, thankless at that and was no need to be personal davo. Please note im not ew so please dont take it out on me, can we stop fighting amongst ourselves cos thats takin away the real problem, thanks.

DAV007 · 03-11-2009, 00:32

Im sorry if you took it personal, but such over the top actions are pathetic IMO.

Im a strong believer in freedom in liberalism in accrington stanley.

If it was opinion and not fact then I understand that you may be concerned regarding slander, but a internet message board is a great place for a bloke/girl to steam off.
I would rather someone lost it on a message board than smacked Oneill/Heys.

I think this is an exceptional circumstance and as a moderator it is not ideal to be so quick to play the judge.

Stanleymad · 03-11-2009, 00:39

To even call me names is against the rules, i have done nowt to u, if u dont like my actions then dont post thats the way it is. Carry on abusing me and thread will close. Please read the rules actions justified End of.

DAV007 · 03-11-2009, 00:55

I havent abused you once, i have called the actions of a moderator as pathetiC.

There is a clear difference.
Please, re-read my post.

I dont know you and i have got nothing against you.

Im sorry if my opinion has upset you.

Please, as you rightly pointed out we need to stand together against the current board.

Im sorry for having an opinion in favour of freedom of speech.

Neil · 03-11-2009, 01:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007

Stanleymad

i think your pathetic if im honest.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007

I havent abused you once, i have called the actions of a moderator as pathetiC.

There is a clear difference.
Please, re-read my post.

It sounds like you called her pathetic to me.

DAV007 · 03-11-2009, 01:04

so I did, i didnt realise.

I apologise for the personal dig.

I need to listen to my own advise and re-read my posts.

sorry about the above.

Neil · 03-11-2009, 01:06

[quote=DAV007;759854]I need to listen to my own advise and re-read my posts./quote]

lol its all the excitement

LYNX1 · 03-11-2009, 08:06

Well Stanleymad.............I think you are doing your job ( and doing it well) if I may say so........You are a staunch Stanley fan but you are being fair and staying within the rules....under great duress, long may you rein

Wynonie Harris · 03-11-2009, 09:06

Come on, Dav, Stanleymad's doing a great job under very difficult circumstances. Unsubstantiated rumours aren't going to get us anywhere. Let Ilyas dig out the facts of this whole sorry mess!

Stanleymad · 03-11-2009, 09:48

Thank you both for your support i do try my best to keep the flow and the forum going peacefully, understand the emotions as ilyas advised lets keep cool show the club unity!

Tealeaf · 03-11-2009, 10:14

Stanleyleymad is quite right in what he is doing, which is a difficult job in trying and difficult circumstances. I would find it deeply ironic that if, in six months time, certain individuals were to be summoned to the same High Court in London for a civil hearing about libellous comments publically made on here.

yonmon · 03-11-2009, 10:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tealeaf

Stanleyleymad is quite right in what he is doing, which is a difficult job in trying and difficult circumstances. I would find it deeply ironic that if, in six months time, certain individuals were to be summoned to the same High Court in London for a civil hearing about libellous comments publically made on here.

Quite so Tealeaf...and as a well-known Male Chauvinist Pig (A title which incidentally, Mrs.Y. has given me permission to use!)...and one who generally tends to shun the prescence of assertive females....I do commend SM on her patience and fortitude...after all gazing at a Monitor Screen, viewing what some contributors think are useful statements to make...and then deciding whether or not they are suitable for innocent eyes to read....cannot be an easy job !!....
Why even a Man might find some problems within it???.

(Alfred.E. sends his respects to you too SM !!)

Tealeaf · 03-11-2009, 11:05

To tanleyleymad:

orry, it was a typing error. The 'S' tick on my keyboard, and I don't alway notice. And the ley tend to repeat itself.

george ivan · 04-11-2009, 21:08

Just a quick reply to stanley mad, I accept the story i quoted was only an allegation however i was completely gobsmacked when i heard it? i honestly thought it was relevant in view of the clubs current crisis. I just want to make it clear to everybody that there was no abusive language on my post.