Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough - Page 5

KIPAX · 16-12-2006, 21:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones

If we are in control in May I would like to see the Supporters Club brought on board to 'oversee' what is happening..

hahahaha .....apart from the obvious re the supporters club....what chance have you got of winning anything in may after this... this thread will be coming back up when its time to vote...... its all going to come back and haunt you...

g jones · 16-12-2006, 21:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

I dont have any view on whats going on.. All I know is that your in here causing trouble and slagging off the accrington stanley chairman who has done so much for the club and this town.. not the celeverest thing you have done..

Your right in one sense. I am here to express an opinion on the Accrington Stanley Chairman who has started a political row. If he is going to give stick, he has to accept he is going to receive it. Don't throw stones in greenhouses.

The other sense of course is standing up for what's right (IMO) and protecting the Council's assets.

accymel · 16-12-2006, 21:14

What im going to ask is gonna put the cat among the pigeons but........ what actually has Eric Whalley done for the TOWN ? we know what he's done for the club & the players

KIPAX · 16-12-2006, 21:16

accymel... if it needs explaining

KIPAX · 16-12-2006, 21:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by g jones

If he is going to give stick, he has to accept he is going to receive it. Don't throw stones in greenhouses.

but he isnt in here is he... just you attacking him...

g jones · 16-12-2006, 21:17

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

hahahaha .....apart from the obvious re the supporters club....what chance have you got of winning anything in may after this... this thread will be coming back up when its time to vote...... its all going to come back and haunt you...

It would probably be beneficial if there was a frank and clear discussion.

accymel · 16-12-2006, 21:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

accymel... if it needs explaining

I think for point of arguement it does actually ? I know what he has done for Accrington Stanley btw

g jones · 16-12-2006, 21:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

but he isnt in here is he... just you attacking him...

I am sorry. Eric launched a newspaper article against the council and Peter Britcliffe. It contained inacuracies.

KIPAX · 16-12-2006, 21:20

then argue back in the newspaper instead of making accusations on a messageboard

lancsdave · 16-12-2006, 21:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

then argue back in the newspaper instead of making accusations on a messageboard

Does that mean anything that appears in the papers shouldn't be discussed in here ?

g jones · 16-12-2006, 21:31

Quote:

Originally Posted by KIPAX

then argue back in the newspaper instead of making accusations on a messageboard

I think your right in the sense of a more open debate. The trouble is, it is in the hands of solicitors, and you are aware of the situation when that occurs.

Like I said in March?
1) Stanley should look at the feasability of a new ground compared to renovating the Crown

And I would add a second view...
2) In the current situation, it would be beneficial if the supporters club were involved in the discussions somehow. I can see much more progress for the club if that was to happen instead of the childish politiking that has dogged the discussions. I have not been involved in those discussions but get told second hand.

KIPAX · 16-12-2006, 21:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave

Does that mean anything that appears in the papers shouldn't be discussed in here ?

no why would it...???

mister jones here said he is doing all this because eric should expect a response because of what was in the paper.... i am saying the response should be in the paper.. not that it shouldnt be discussed...

yes?