|
Accrington Stanley Accrington Stanley forum. |
|
|
Welcome to Accrington Web!
We are a discussion forum dedicated to the towns of Accrington, Oswaldtwistle and the surrounding areas, sometimes referred to as Hyndburn! We are a friendly bunch please feel free to browse or read on for more info. You are currently viewing our site as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, photos, play in the community arcade and use our blog section. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
|
16-12-2006, 23:21
|
#76
|
God Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: defending the union
Posts: 5,540
Liked: 117 times
Rep Power: 5286
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
good... anyway i would believe u before im anyway
|
|
|
16-12-2006, 23:22
|
#77
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Watching YOU !!!
Posts: 1,286
Liked: 2 times
Rep Power: 100
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
How come every post by mr jones is edited by him after he has posted it ???
|
|
|
16-12-2006, 23:23
|
#78
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Watching YOU !!!
Posts: 1,286
Liked: 2 times
Rep Power: 100
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
"EVERY" is a journalists comment by the way..
|
|
|
16-12-2006, 23:25
|
#79
|
I am Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,688
Liked: 0 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmonstanley
|
I wouldnt like stanley to move to whitebirk anyways as far as im concerned its blackburn not hyndburn, but as fishy site has said they cant see it being likely.
|
|
|
16-12-2006, 23:35
|
#80
|
Member.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bispham
Posts: 9,477
Liked: 71 times
Rep Power: 3501
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Whatever the final decision on the move Accrington Stanley is a town football club and should be situated at the heart of the town or at least as close as possible to the centre, if that’s not possible then it should certainly be within the town’s boundaries.
I think the fishy sites Statement should now take precedent and these dim quotes of bollock sweat should be left to pass into those dark dank areas of Accyweb that we dare not go……
__________________
On - Stanley – On - Who’s Laughing Now -
|
|
|
16-12-2006, 23:37
|
#81
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,281
Liked: 995 times
Rep Power: 11936
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Will you all be boycotting the Accrington Observer, after all they are the ones who printed the story
|
|
|
16-12-2006, 23:39
|
#82
|
I am Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,688
Liked: 0 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
I dont get it any way except if theres a good reason
|
|
|
16-12-2006, 23:41
|
#83
|
Member.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bispham
Posts: 9,477
Liked: 71 times
Rep Power: 3501
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Quote:
Originally Posted by lancsdave
Will you all be boycotting the Accrington Observer, after all they are the ones who printed the story
|
Dave it's a news paper like all others, I buy it, read it, when I'm poor I wipe my arse on it, but I would never take it as gospel.
__________________
On - Stanley – On - Who’s Laughing Now -
|
|
|
16-12-2006, 23:42
|
#84
|
God Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 14,281
Liked: 995 times
Rep Power: 11936
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doug
Dave it's a news paper like all others, I buy it, read it, when I'm poor I wipe my arse on it, but I would never take it as gospel.
|
Well thats got more use than the Blackburn Comic aka Lancashire Telegraph
|
|
|
16-12-2006, 23:52
|
#85
|
Member.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bispham
Posts: 9,477
Liked: 71 times
Rep Power: 3501
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Quote:
Originally Posted by lancsdave
Well thats got more use than the Blackburn Comic aka Lancashire Telegraph
|
Even better, I take an 80 mile round trip for the pleasure.......
__________________
On - Stanley – On - Who’s Laughing Now -
|
|
|
17-12-2006, 00:53
|
#86
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: On another planet.
Posts: 11,865
Liked: 1217 times
Rep Power: 144710
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Councillor Jones, do you not think we have enough problems with our poor run of results, precarious league position, falling gates and seemingly never-ending list of injuries, without you coming on here and stirring the s**t?
This afternoon, I have watched eleven lads play their hearts out with passion, spirit and a never-say-die attitude and I was privileged to do it with 200+ other Stanley loyalists. And, quite frankly, that means more to me than all your nasty, underhand political tactics.
You say you're a Rovers fan, councillor Jones. Well, go and post on their site because you are certainly not welcome here.
__________________
|
|
|
17-12-2006, 02:29
|
#87
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 65
Liked: 0 times
Rep Power: 0
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Quote:
Originally Posted by g jones
I am sorry. Eric launched a newspaper article against the council and Peter Britcliffe. It contained inacuracies.
|
Mr Jones, if it contained inaccuracies, then I could understand your stance.
But inacuracies ? what are they?
Yoy arr a compleete ferking winker, and an illiterate one too ! adios
|
|
|
17-12-2006, 08:03
|
#88
|
Accy Red
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris
without you coming on here and stirring the s**t?
|
I was under the impression that this thread was started because of something Eric Whalley has done or not done. Lets get this matter into court then we can discuss the real facts, until then Mr Jones you will be wasting your time discussing with people who are totally blinkered to anything Eric Whalley related.
__________________
"At a football club, there's a holy trinity - the players, the manager and the supporters. Directors don't come into it. They're only there to sign cheques." - Bill Shankly
|
|
|
17-12-2006, 10:08
|
#89
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pie eating country again
Posts: 4,659
Liked: 442 times
Rep Power: 63678
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Can I just clear up a minor point on this thread. Whitebirk has always been in Hyndburn and the border is the river that runs by then new Eastern area Police Headquarters. All the industrial estate on the right (heading towards Preston and before the railway bridge belongs to HBC. Always has done always will do. BUt and this is a big BUT, The club belongs to Accrington not Hyndburn, therefore, we need to stay within the boundaries of the town including the districts of SpringHill, Huncoat, Clayton, Church, Oswaldtwistle, Baxenden and Altham. Outside any of these districts and the identity would disappear rapidly.. BTW this all came about by meddling politicians in London - now where have I heard that before???
__________________
Piston broke owd geezer, Stanley supporter and shareholder, Retired and loving it Addendum, the views I express on here are my own, if you don't like them: TOUGH!
|
|
|
17-12-2006, 10:19
|
#90
|
Senior Member+
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,125
Liked: 14 times
Rep Power: 731
|
Re: Stanley turn down Freedom of the Borough
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bagpuss
I was under the impression that this thread was started because of something Eric Whalley has done or not done. Lets get this matter into court then we can discuss the real facts, until then Mr Jones you will be wasting your time discussing with people who are totally blinkered to anything Eric Whalley related.
|
I agree. There's is not much that is going to change in the thread. People are RIGHT to get uptight about critcism of the club and they are right to have a pop. It's a free country, we have free speech.
If the truth comes out it will all turn on it's head, so I am not concerned. I have yet to meet anyone aware of all the facts who does not share a similar view to me. One or two who have become aware now have a completely different perspective. And they are comfortable that I am in difficult circumstances taking the moral highground.
Peter is right, Eric is wrong. Eric started the dirty politics period, Eric can end it with an apology and an acceptance of the Freedoom of the Borough and stop playing politics in other matters. I am using freedom of speech to back Peter. I'll just have to tough the criticism out.
On the point of Accringtonianism and directly related to this matter I would say this; Seeing as my great grandad, whom I knew and loved, was on the Somme carrying off dead and injuried bodies, and my Aunts father was gassed at Ypres, I was disgusted with Eric and see it as a personal insult on my family and this town the way he turned down the Freedom of the Borough the way he did. More than anything else, Eric's insult on this was just too much.
I think there needs to be further developments before posting again.
|
|
|
Other sites of interest.. |
More town sites.. |
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:52.
© 2003-2013 AccringtonWeb.com
|
|