Stanley Under Investigation - Page 11

ukcowboy · 15-03-2007, 16:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCR ADIM

if you buy the observer today there is a write up on front page saying stanley could lose SEVEN points it goes on to say the first playing being chris mcgrail who cam on as a sub in 3-2 over mansfield town and the 1-1 draw with wycombe wanderers and the second is local teenage goalkeeper martin fearon

I can understand a possible 'cock up' with McGrail, but to have a similar problem with one of our OWN youth team players is , IMHO, an absolute farce.

That said we still dont know what's happened or who is responsible, should we get docked 7 points, I can only hope that a) it does'nt happen, and b) if it does then the person responsible will be held to account.

I guess weve all got to play a waiting game now?

maccawozzagod · 15-03-2007, 17:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukcowboy

is , IMHO, an absolute farce.

technically it's a technicality

ukcowboy · 15-03-2007, 17:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by maccawozzagod

technically it's a technicality

Ahh now it is all as clear as MUD!

Thanks for clearing that one up Macca!!

Outback Ozzy · 15-03-2007, 18:47

Surely Martin Fearon has already signed on the dotted line as a first team player, albeit in reserve (so to speak). I was under the impression he was signed on last season, so surely his registration carries over to this one. The other point is, he hasn't played only warmed the bench!!!

Redash · 15-03-2007, 19:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by Outback Ozzy

Surely Martin Fearon has already signed on the dotted line as a first team player, albeit in reserve (so to speak). I was under the impression he was signed on last season, so surely his registration carries over to this one. The other point is, he hasn't played only warmed the bench!!!

This might explain why he hasn't been on the bench for the last 2 games.

K.S.H · 15-03-2007, 19:13

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redash

This might explain why he hasn't been on the bench for the last 2 games.

Good point

Oggy · 15-03-2007, 19:53

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCR ADIM

if you buy the observer today there is a write up on front page saying stanley could lose SEVEN points it goes on to say the first playing being chris mcgrail who cam on as a sub in 3-2 over mansfield town and the 1-1 draw with wycombe wanderers and the second is local teenage goalkeeper martin fearon

I really wish the club had made public which was the third game, can't believe it's left to conjecture.

If Fearon is the player involved, then can only imagine it's his first game back from Clitheroe that will be the problem. Unfortunately it was when he was on the bench in the win at Wrexham, for any possible points deduction to include two wins would be remarkably unlucky.

Does the Observer quote it's source?

(Being on the bench qualifies for loss of points, as far as I understand)

Haggis316 · 15-03-2007, 20:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCR ADIM

if you buy the observer today there is a write up on front page saying stanley could lose SEVEN points it goes on to say the first playing being chris mcgrail who cam on as a sub in 3-2 over mansfield town and the 1-1 draw with wycombe wanderers and the second is local teenage goalkeeper martin fearon

Yes see:

http://www.accringtonobserver.co.uk/..._the_town.html

harwood red · 15-03-2007, 20:25

If it is fearo, then I hope for the lads sake that there isn't any silly chanting to the fact on saturday. Cos although its in no way his fault he is bound to feel pretty bad about it.

so please don't be having a go at him from the terraces on saturday!!!!!!!!!!

Oggy · 15-03-2007, 20:46

Thanks for the link Haggis, so the source is Eric, fair enough.
Still don't know why it wasn't announced straight away

For clarity, two seperate cases, so could still be 0,3,4 or 7 points deduction depending on the seperate outcomes.

Glad that's cleared up

lancsdave · 15-03-2007, 21:02

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oggy

(Being on the bench qualifies for loss of points, as far as I understand)

Correct sort of. If he was named as a sub ( which I guess is what you meant) then it's counted the same as playing regardless of wether he enters the pitch.

Leeds got done for having six loan players on the team sheet against Burnley earlier this season. The 6th was actually the sub goalkeeper and didn't take part in the match.

Bagpuss · 15-03-2007, 22:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by harwood red

If it is fearo, then I hope for the lads sake that there isn't any silly chanting to the fact on saturday. Cos although its in no way his fault he is bound to feel pretty bad about it.

so please don't be having a go at him from the terraces on saturday!!!!!!!!!!

Why should anyone chant it's nothing to do with Fearon, it's chants like Whalley out or Coleman out that might be heard if we lose.

shakermaker · 15-03-2007, 22:04

What's Coley done wrong?

He doesn't do the hiring & firing!

Bagpuss · 15-03-2007, 22:11

[quote=shakermaker;398103]What's Coley done wrong?
quote]
It was just a thought but I will join in if the chant Whalley out is sung.

shakermaker · 15-03-2007, 22:12

Aye count me in