Stanley Under Investigation - Page 13

Outback Ozzy · 20-03-2007, 18:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by hereford till i die

i hope they do see sense and take the points of accy, you got away with it in the conference, when altrincham took all the blame for a similar situation, perhaps time has caught up with you.

I am sick and tired of your bleating (oops) will you get your facts right just for once. Altrincham got a points deduction because they played the player in their first team for a number of matches. We didn't full stop, end of story. He only came on trial here and played in the reserve's and thats what we got done for. We could not be fined or deducted any points for first team fixtures and basically its obvious from your visits to this forum, you must be insanely jealous of a superior footballing side and the 3 points to Stanley on Saturday will show. Now do go away you annoying little minded person.

ukcowboy · 20-03-2007, 18:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by hereford till i die

yes i have a brain, and if your little inbred poster ksh had not come on our forum stirring things up i would not be on here, so blame IT for the situation.

Are you REALLY that EASY to wind up?

Good grief Man (boy), get a grip, get a life and grow up a little..........HUFC fans and ourselves have always had a good banter, just ask ex-landlord etc, but you seem to be on a personal crusade all because you didnt like a SPOOF poster.............come on get real mate.

As for the 'Welsh' jokes, they've been going on for years and will probably continue to do so..............and not just from us I suspect..........no matter, have a safe journey over on Saturday, enjoy the game and go home empty handed............AGAIN

MikeA · 21-03-2007, 22:06

Quote:

Originally Posted by hereford till i die

hereford till i die

Please do it before Saturday then we'll all be happy.

Jesus_was_A_red_ · 23-03-2007, 19:18

Observer states Stanley will know outcome a week today regarding points deducted IF that is to be the outcome.

Tin Monkey · 23-03-2007, 20:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jesus_was_A_red_

Observer states Stanley will know outcome a week today regarding points deducted IF that is to be the outcome.

It's always been the 30th March.

Oggy · 24-03-2007, 13:14

BBC: Wrexham hope international clearance arrives in time to include loan signing from Hartlepool, Michael Proctor.

Just play him anyway, nobody will snitch

There's a thought, Wrexham need international clearance on nearly everyone, unless from Cardiff, Swansea, Newport or H.....(no, it really is wearing a bit thin now)...averfordwest

Whinney Hill beckons

K.S.H · 24-03-2007, 17:50

Heard a good whisper today about this enquiry from a good scource, things are looking a little better then I expected, have to keep my gob shut though

stanleyfan · 24-03-2007, 17:53

teams in the past have started the new season on minus points, if we are going to have points deducted then thats better than now! Hope it goes well. Can you be deducted points for having someone on the bench who didnt come on and affect play? (Martin fearon)

sparkie · 25-03-2007, 11:32

Short answer yes!!!

stanleyfan · 25-03-2007, 11:34

well if thats the case then shouldnt preston be charged for putting chris mcgrail on the first team bench if we are gunna be charged for putting one of our 'youth players' on the bench?

lancsdave · 25-03-2007, 11:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by stanleyfan

teams in the past have started the new season on minus points, if we are going to have points deducted then thats better than now! Hope it goes well. Can you be deducted points for having someone on the bench who didnt come on and affect play? (Martin fearon)

Technically yes but because the Football League aren't as viscious as the FA then I suspect you may well get away with a warning on that one because he didn't influence the result of the game.

Haggis316 · 25-03-2007, 12:58

If as has been suggested on this thread Leeds were fined just £2000 for having an ineligible unfielded goalie on the bench why should Stanley get more than a fine for it scaled down to reflect the fact that they are a much smaller club?

As I see it the three points at Wrexham should be unimpeachable.

The goalie at Leeds might have been ineligible to play for another reason but ineligible to play is ineligible to play.

lancsdave · 25-03-2007, 13:00

Quote:

Originally Posted by Haggis316

If Leeds were fined just £2000 for having an ineligible unfielded goalie on the bench why should Stanley get more than a fine for it scaled down to reflect the fact that they are a much smaller club?

As I see it the three points at Wrexham should be unimpeachable.

They couldn't take points off Leeds for the game.

Jimbo T Hornblower · 25-03-2007, 13:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by K.S.H

Heard a good whisper today about this enquiry from a good scource, things are looking a little better then I expected, have to keep my gob shut though

As has been publicly said before KSH, Stanley have put a strong case for the hearing on the 30th but cannot say anything. You know it, I know it - just wish scaremongerers on here and the press could know it. You'll all find out on the 30th just how much of a technicality this thing is Im sure....

Jimbo T

blower

Oggy · 25-03-2007, 15:11

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimbo T Hornblower

As has been publicly said before KSH, Stanley have put a strong case for the hearing on the 30th but cannot say anything. You know it, I know it - just wish scaremongerers on here and the press could know it. You'll all find out on the 30th just how much of a technicality this thing is Im sure.... Jimbo T

blower

Conjecture and hearsay I can ignore or treat on its merits, source, content, liklehood etc

Censorship on the otherhand........