Stanley Under Investigation - Page 14

Jimbo T Hornblower · 25-03-2007, 15:26

Speak to Stanleys solicitors - censorship is their rule not the clubs and that is especially in effect on here simply because of the people that do read this.. All Im saying is that right from the outset the club said that they have a strong case together to put to the hearing on the 30th - thats not new news and people on here are all doom and gloom - thats not new either. Lets just see the outcome and then we can be doom and gloom if it turns out to be nasty, until then stop the poo stirring.... People mentioning the FA etc - its NOTHING to do with the FA

Jimbo T

blower

Oggy · 25-03-2007, 16:03

It was all relatively quiet till you stuck your two pennorth in, Jimbo.

You're not doing Eric any favours by acting as his heavy, and making little sense IMHO.

Jimbo T Hornblower · 26-03-2007, 06:46

Im really sorry if thats how I come across but thats not how I meant it at all. Some people are attacking the club for not saying anything officially on this matter when they are purely acting on solicitors instructions, perhaps not on here but elsewhere maybe. Again I apologise if I came across as being a bit strong...

Jimbo T

blower

AccyJay · 26-03-2007, 14:38

AFC Wimbledon have just had an 18 point deduction for feilding an ineligble player reduced to 3 points.

AccyJay · 26-03-2007, 16:04

Here is the original story.

Here is the confirmation.

There's hope for Stanley supporters now.

Jimbo T Hornblower · 27-03-2007, 10:12

Please also remember the original charges against Wimbledon were placed by their respective league authority so this may not have any actual bearing on our decision as we are also being charged by our own league authority who may have a totally seperate set of differentiating rules than the Ryman. Looks like Wimbledon took the charges further up, ie to the FA for appeal and it seems to have resulted in a reprieval of kinds - good on em..

Jimbo T

blower

Haggis316 · 28-03-2007, 22:52

Its only surmise but if in relation to Chris Mcgrail Stanley's only offence was not ensuring that Preston had served the appropriate notice on the FA the Football League Stanley and the player who suffered from this failure, what detriment did they incur?

Is anyone seriously saying that the Football League or the FA would have vetoed the loan had they received formal notice?

To deduct points over such a technicality jeopardising Stanley's position in the Football League only recently resumed after a 44 year absence when there are worse sides - not least Boston and Torquay - would be totally ridiculous.

As to the Wrexham game I don't see how we can have points deducted for keeping our own sub goal keeper on the bench when we are told Leeds were only fined £2000 for keeping an ineligible to play goal keeper on their bench.

Wynonie Harris · 29-03-2007, 12:54

We've got Mr Bean helping us tomorrow!

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk...ary_expert.php

Must say, it sounds quite promising.

Kiwi John · 29-03-2007, 17:43

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

We've got Mr Bean helping us tomorrow!

http://www.lancashiretelegraph.co.uk...ary_expert.php

Must say, it sounds quite promising.

Can anyone guess where a large dollop of the Craney/Roberts transfer fees will be going????

WOLVERHAMPTON REDS · 29-03-2007, 18:35

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiwi John

Can anyone guess where a large dollop of the Craney/Roberts transfer fees will be going????

and the roof money

maccawozzagod · 29-03-2007, 19:06

does it work like normal court that if found innocent, or on appeal, the Football League have to pick up the tab?

I dont know about anybody else but I resigned myself to seven points weeks ago, anything less is a bonus and that is how I'd prefer to think to as not to be 'unexpectedly' walloped with a seven point deduction. BUt saying that I am now feeling quietly confident.

The club made a statement at the time that basically told us the charges have been laid - no further comment. That gave a feeling of forboding, but the comments made by Mr Bean - although still giving away no further information - instilled a more positive feeling than what I had. I just wish Mr Bean had met a reporter weeks ago.......

Haggis316 · 30-03-2007, 20:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Haggis316

I said "As to the Wrexham game I don't see how we can have points deducted for keeping our own sub goal keeper on the bench when we are told Leeds were only fined £2000 for keeping an ineligible to play goal keeper on their bench."

Someone privately made the following point:

"how could leeds of been deducted points in that game when they lost it !! totally different situation"

which would be fair enough if I didn't support Sheffield Wednesday.

zayno14 · 02-04-2007, 20:01

Listen to this idiot..

last few minutes of the interview:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/lincolnshire/re...ager_31mar.ram

Redash · 02-04-2007, 20:14

The guy's a W@nk3r. He should be in Jail.

He claims the league want Boston out, I wonder why?
You've got to feel sorry for their fans though.

AccyMad · 02-04-2007, 20:34

Why am I not surprised at anything that comes out of that ******* mouth? Sour grapes isn't in it! He was so obviously grasping at straws when he was bleating on about what should happen to us and in this 'speech' he's just tryin to justify what he said. Yes I do feel sorry for Bostons fans, I might not always agree with Coley but compared to Evans he's a bloody angel.