Stanley Under Investigation - Page 3

accymel · 08-03-2007, 18:12

Quote:

Originally Posted by ukcowboy

And they all lived happily ever after................NOT

If this allegation is proved, then I think you might find we will lose more than 4 points..........didnt Alty get docked 14 points for fielding ONE ineligble player...........apparently we have fielded 2...........this just smacks of amateurisim (sp)............what ever next I wonder?

............hello conference not nice to be back but hey its a big fall ...

ukcowboy · 08-03-2007, 18:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel

............hello conference not nice to be back but hey its a big fall ...

Touche

Bradshaw Boy · 08-03-2007, 18:28

Didn't Altrincham get docked 18 points because that was the amount they got while Robinson played for them?

Oldgobbin · 08-03-2007, 18:28

In fact, UKCowboy, Alty were docked all the points they gained when Robinson featured, either in the team or on the bench. With McGrail, I think that would be 4 points, but who's the other player - that's the worry!

nadsw2002 · 08-03-2007, 18:30

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiwi John

the FA/Football League have admitted that THEY have made an administrative error and we are in the clear...PLEASE

I think we are the ones who made the error? Assuming we supported a club who knew what they were doing!
OMG this aint good is it??

ukcowboy · 08-03-2007, 18:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldgobbin

In fact, UKCowboy, Alty were docked all the points they gained when Robinson featured, either in the team or on the bench. With McGrail, I think that would be 4 points, but who's the other player - that's the worry!

Thanks for the clarification......I was'nt sure about the facts, I just knew they were deducted a hell of a lot of points.

Cant think who the other player could be, apart from perhaps Mauro not bieng cleared, but surley the powers that be wouldnt make the same mistake as our Manchester based 'friends'..............would they?

K.S.H · 08-03-2007, 18:35

Can we not blame Preston for releasing him to us, surely a team of their stature should have known

lancsdave · 08-03-2007, 18:38

No matter what the clubs defence it seems likely that if the FA have charged them they will be certain they have broke the rules. Claims of administration errors do not wash with the FA as Bury and AFC Wimbledon have found out this season.

accymel · 08-03-2007, 18:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by K.S.H

Can we not blame Preston for releasing him to us, surely a team of their stature should have known

Like the knob enders are going to tell us owt

lancsdave · 08-03-2007, 18:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by accymel

Like the knob enders are going to tell us owt

Well it will save us getting blamed this time

Doug · 08-03-2007, 18:40

If this is true then its negligence, as well as gross stupidity. I would suggest that those responsible, the managers and the players get there fingers out of their arses and make good any point deduction.

Oldgobbin · 08-03-2007, 18:42

I daren't look at the Confguide forum. I'll bet they are all rubbing their hands with glee!

AccyMad · 08-03-2007, 18:42

The thing I can't understand, if it was Chris McGrail and it's true that he wasn't elegible to play league games, how come he'd been on the bench at Preston a couple of times before he came to us on loan?? Doesn't make any sense.

AccyJay · 08-03-2007, 18:47

I've just had a couple of reporters from the Lancashire Telegraph in the Oaklea. They said that this relates to 2 players.

accymel · 08-03-2007, 18:49

Quote:

Originally Posted by AccyJay

I've just had a couple of reporters from the Lancashire Telegraph in the Oaklea. They said that this relates to 2 players.

So they dont know then Jay, u did try bribing them for info