Terry Gornell - Joined Shrewsbury - Page 3

VALAIRIAN · 05-07-2011, 11:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldgobbin

Davo may class me amongst the idiots, and good luck to him if he does. However, I consider myself something of a Craney supporter and have no objection to Jimmy Ryan or anyone else bettering themselves, if that turns out to be the case. However...... Let's see now, will Inverness have me? No! Oh dear! Will someone else, then? ..... Maybe, Oh yes, Shrewsbury will! Not the same ball game at all, I feel, and I repeat, Good Riddance!

I do not think that that is the full story when it comes to T.G. and I.C.T.!!!

DAV007 · 06-07-2011, 02:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by football19

Davo,you are entitled to your own opinion,but to blame Coleys lack of rotation of players for Gornells dip in form makes me smile.

Its not the only reason im sure, but Colemans refusal to rotate his squad does have an impact on the players and results.

DAV007 · 06-07-2011, 03:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oldgobbin

However...... Let's see now, will Inverness have me? No! Oh dear! Will someone else, then? ..... Maybe, Oh yes, Shrewsbury will! Not the same ball game at all, I feel, and I repeat, Good Riddance!

That is simply not the case.
Like it or not, Shrewsbury have more ambition than Stanley and so does Gornell.
He has been good for us, we have been good for him - we should be grateful for his efforts and wish him well.

Wynonie Harris · 06-07-2011, 07:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by DAV007

Like it or not, Shrewsbury have more ambition than Stanley

It's more to do with lack of fans than lack of ambition. Shrewsbury's average home gate for last season was 5875, compared to our 1867. Their lowest home gate (4343) was way ahead of our highest home gate (2815). That's the root of Stanley's problems with holding on to players - not lack of ambition which Coley and Jimmy have in abundance.

cashman · 06-07-2011, 08:01

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

It's more to do with lack of fans than lack of ambition. Shrewsbury's average home gate for last season was 5875, compared to our 1867. Their lowest home gate (4343) was way ahead of our highest home gate (2815). That's the root of Stanley's problems with holding on to players - not lack of ambition which Coley and Jimmy have in abundance.

Nail on the head.

lancsdave · 06-07-2011, 08:06

You don't measure ambition by how many times you can face a winding up order

Chimer · 06-07-2011, 08:24

Quote:

Originally Posted by lancsdave

You don't measure ambition by how many times you can face a winding up order

.... although it's quite a good measure of over-ambition

cashman · 06-07-2011, 08:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chimer

.... although it's quite a good measure of over-ambition

Dave wouldn't be aware..........being a dingle.

fc:stanley · 06-07-2011, 11:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wynonie Harris

It's more to do with lack of fans than lack of ambition. Shrewsbury's average home gate for last season was 5875, compared to our 1867. Their lowest home gate (4343) was way ahead of our highest home gate (2815). That's the root of Stanley's problems with holding on to players - not lack of ambition which Coley and Jimmy have in abundance.

Very well put Wynonie ! Also has alot to the facilities and ground! Shrewsburys players have a state of the art training centre with restaurant etc, while we have a field with Mick Shultz making chip butties for dinner! They get special treatment at Shrewsbury at home games , with state of the art bars and VIP areas and just better changing rooms ! When players like Terry and Joe see things like that and with an extra couple of hundred quid a week extra added on they are never going to say no.

We are In need of a new ground definitely to progress! Players want this and it really does attract them !

Feel so bad for coley this season as at least last season and previous ones we had Edwards and Jimmy !