Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo T Hornblower
Perhaps if more people asked the people involved or 'in the know' so to speak, the club wouldnt be given the chance to distance itself from the everyday fan??
Jimbo T blower
|
They have various forms of media available to them and at any point could pass on a snippet of information such as "such-a-body has been sacked for their part in the getting Alty relegated scandal".
I wasn't aware that somebody had been sacked and still can't think who it would have been? But the point is, is that we shouldn't all have to go up to the ground and seek out somebody who may or may not be in the know. If its newsworthy enough to gossip about then its newworthy enough to be news.
We all crave information about the club or we wouldn't be talking about it would we? There should be ten points of interest coming out every day via the website. Let the newspapers find their own stories, let them check the website every ten minutes to see if anything has broken. Has Sean Doherty gone on trial at Ipswich? Why should we read about it on BBC teletext or News of the World? No doubt if I had asked Coley after the game yestereday then he would have told me
Or is it all an April Fools day joke and Lee got the wrong date?
I would not be surprised at who reads this messageboard, thats why its there, but maybe if certain people are reading and disagreeing with points raised then they should be answering them on here, with their name and position attached to it, rather than moaning behind closed doors that such a body is doing or saying this and that. Maybe they should realise that, although only a small percentage of the support are represented on here, it is a fair reflection of the considered opinion of the Stanley fan base, and if 90% of web opinion says that the hot dogs are crap (they're not, just an eg) then they are crap and they should do something about it. Are the club slow to respond or are we slow to ask?