Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisr
I agree that there has been some good positive ideas on this thread and welcome them. Many have been suggested previously and as I say were shot down by those in the clubs hierarchy that we can't afford it.
|
I dont know who in the clubs hierarchy has been shooting ideas down?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chrisr
I am delighted that the points you are making are now being given consideration.
|
being considered by whom?
I dont intend to have a go at you in partcularly Chris, just using quoting that before I start. Sometimes we may assume that by having a discussion on here that the club has read it and somehow joined in - and then by not acting upon it they have dismissed it.
The problem with Accrington Stanley of 2016 is that it had been neglected for many years. Ground developments other than compulsory work (ie seats put in) was 1 in 10 years (the roof). Nothing had been done regards infrastructure in that same timescale, there was no plan b. Ever.
For over a decade it was a struggle to get through the day and still have electricity to set the alarm. All of Eric's money went daily on wages, and there was nothing left to put into a fund for getting things going. The word marketing was alien to him. Post Eric we had Ilyas who was only ever an interim helmsman and had been there to fight off the wolves. He stated that he wouldn't be a fairy godmother or sugar daddy and he was right. He passed the baton to Peter who again, could only afford to put in the minimum requirements to keep the club afloat.
Now we have Andy Holt. He too has stated that he won't be a sugar daddy, but he WAS able to put in enough money to pay off all creditors and stop us wasting thousands of pounds a month on interest payments, or late payment penalties. He HAS put in tens of thousands (if not hundreds) to start tidying the place up and making it capable of retaining fans. We have lost dozens of fans due to leaky rooves and waterlogged bogs. That's no longer an option.
He HAS got a plan regarding the development of the ground to enable it start attracting and keeping new fans. He wants the ground to make money for us which it has NEVER done in the past.
So, we have an owner who is willing and capable of developing the club. He has ideas of his own and will hopefully listen to the ideas of others in how to progress the profile of the club. Every prospective fan who doesnt yet attend we must consider to be a 'no'. Yet every salesman will tell you there is no such word as no = just 'not yet'. Find the objection and then overcome it.
What are the objections?
1. crap ground, crap footy
Yes it's a crap ground but its improving. The footy is usually fairly good but is still League 2 and that is something we can do little about
2. Overpriced.
We can do something about this but unless you expect AH to keep footing the bill then we need to spend what we can at the ground rather than elsewhere. Once the club can recover the lost revenue it can start to do something about the prices - but the turnover simply HAS to improve
3. The club has a bad reputation
Yes it has. Gambling problems, poor disciplinary record over the years, bills unpaid, constant bucket rattling. This is something that we can do little to improve on other than allowing time to forget. We have to stop griping in public about the fans that dont come. They dont come because they arent fans.
The club has to be seen in a positive light to attract the attention of the potential fan. Results do this. Big cup games, strong league runs etc. But you need a strong element of luck to achieve this, particularly when you haven't got a quarter the budget of other clubs in this league.
We can attract positive attention by highlighting the good things that we do. The Community Team do a fantastic job and occasionally get stories into the press, this needs to be improved upon. Everything should be highlighted. We should, as a club, nominate a local charity that we publicly back and try to raise funds for. We frequently allow certain charities to attend a game and shake their buckets, but how about WE decide on who to raise funds for, WE shake the buckets then present to aforementioned charity. It amounts to the same thing but we also gain positive exposure. Our players must be able to spare an hour after training to go into town and do meet and greets? shake collection tins? speak to local business owners?
We all know that there is far too few staff members at the club, yet we still slate them for not doing enough. Another thread on here is for RIP Jim Shaw. He was our groundsman in the 90's and spent every single waking hour at the club. He did security, caretaker, groundsman, kitman, bar manager .... far too many hours to count. Mick Schultz was the same, and so were many others - Dave Burgess will be no different. We can't knock the man who wears many hats when we find that he doesn't suit one.
I'm hoping that we will soon have a major something to sink our collective teeth into, and will post accordingly at the time. For now though keep thinking of the ideas and the positivity, and lets try to keep a lid on the negative things. It's really not all that terrible at the moment and I personally feel its a little disrespectful to moan about the tiny irrelevant things when so much good stuff is right around the corner.
KTF
OSO
COYR
StID