The Crewe match thread, or the 'Annoy Accy Mad' thread. - Page 9

choirboy · 11-11-2019, 20:36

One other point;
Hughes will get a ban!

choirboy · 11-11-2019, 20:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

well thats speaks volumes for people that crack on they know it all, but know nowt. i know very little dont pretend i do, but i also looked and could NOT find a rule that covered this abomination, also i cannot understand why our club did not seem to have checked this out, they had enough time to do so.

Fully agree Cashy....That is why I started my response with your quote.

StanleyJosh · 11-11-2019, 20:50

Choirboy, 4 announcements were made over the tannoy system from 16.10 (5 mins after 2nd half due to start) until 16:55 when it was announced fame would resume at 17:10

StanleyJosh · 11-11-2019, 20:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

well thats speaks volumes for people that crack on they know it all, but know nowt. i know very little dont pretend i do, but i also looked and could NOT find a rule that covered this abomination, also i cannot understand why our club did not seem to have checked this out, they had enough time to do so.

Cashy, the handbook isn’t publicised. It’s sent to competing clubs before the season starts.
The FA who run the competition were contacted and the decision was made.
I agree it was the wrong decision, but if we won... I wouldn’t care less.
We lost, and even with 2 lino’s we still would have lost

choirboy · 11-11-2019, 21:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh

Choirboy, 4 announcements were made over the tannoy system from 16.10 (5 mins after 2nd half due to start) until 16:55 when it was announced fame would resume at 17:10

I accept about the times being announced StanleyJosh but I still feel that I was not kept well enough informed regarding the replacement refereeing situation.

cashman · 11-11-2019, 21:14

the point is not we would still have lost, we were utter garbage on sat, that to me was due to the way stanley were set up to play.

StanleyJosh · 11-11-2019, 21:15

Quote:

Originally Posted by choirboy

I accept about the times being announced StanleyJosh but I still feel that I was not kept well enough informed regarding the replacement refereeing situation.

Every 10 minutes surely enough? No other news was broadcast because we didn’t know what was happening. It was down to the officials and managers, not a PA.
Soon as PA knew, everyone knew.

choirboy · 11-11-2019, 21:16

Quote:

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh

Cashy, the handbook isn’t publicised. It’s sent to competing clubs before the season starts.
The FA who run the competition were contacted and the decision was made.
I agree it was the wrong decision, but if we won... I wouldn’t care less.
We lost, and even with 2 lino’s we still would have lost

StanleyJosh. You appear to have just agreed above in your own words that the Football Association had no adequate rules to cover this situation, hence the phone call. Also you have agreed that the Football Association made the wrong decision!
I find your comment..."but if we won... I wouldn’t care less" very disappointing. IMHO had we won this would have been no less of a RIDICULOUS thing to have happened.

I have sent a transcript of my earlier post to The football Association but I doubt if I will get any response!

AccyMad · 11-11-2019, 21:17

And look what we would have won (apart from £36,000 of course) - an away tie at Stourbridge or Eastleigh, not very enticing

cashman · 11-11-2019, 21:19

a good draw makes no difference at all to the stupid way the problem was resolved.

StanleyJosh · 11-11-2019, 21:22

Quote:

Originally Posted by choirboy

StanleyJosh. You appear to have just agreed above in your own words that the Football Association had no adequate rules to cover this situation, hence the phone call. Also you have agreed that the Football Association made the wrong decision!
I find your comment..."but if we won... I wouldn’t care less" very disappointing. IMHO had we won this would have been no less of a RIDICULOUS thing to have happened.

I have sent a transcript of my earlier post to The football Association but I doubt if I will get any response!

Would it have been less ridiculous. No.
Would I have been as bothered. No.
Winning is the most important end goal.

In my opinion, a decision was made by the relevant people, I don’t agree with it but have to accept it. Having 1 linesman or 2 - we were still awful and would not have won regardless.

cashman · 11-11-2019, 21:27

so somethings that so blatantly wrong you accept? well sorry i was brought up better than that.

StanleyJosh · 11-11-2019, 21:27

Just a thought....

Possibility that game was agreed to continue to save managers having to agree on a replacement if couldn’t find a suitable one.
If we were 1-0 playing like Crewe were, you’d bet your house Coley would want to continue playing by any means

StanleyJosh · 11-11-2019, 21:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by cashman

so somethings that so blatantly wrong you accept? well sorry i was brought up better than that.

What can you do about it now.
What other options were there?
Should the game have been called off?

cashman · 11-11-2019, 21:29

Quote:

Originally Posted by StanleyJosh

Just a thought....

Possibility that game was agreed to continue to save managers having to agree on a replacement if couldn’t find a suitable one.
If we were 1-0 playing like Crewe were, you’d bet your house Coley would want to continue playing by any means

thats all that is a possibility. if we had been winning it still should not have continued in that manner. it just demonstrates to me me how USELESS the F.A. are.also anyone at our club who agreed to continue in that manner. by the way i heard nothing at all about us being sanctioned.